Cited by 130Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Magnetic resonance image-guided stereotactic cingulotomy for intractable psychiatric disease

Spangler, Wendy J., Cosgrove, G. Rees, Ballantine, H. Thomas, Cassem, Edwin H., Rauch, Scott L., Nierenberg, Andrew, Price, Bruce H.·1996·Neurosurgery

Abstract

We describe the modern operative technique of magnetic resonance (MR) image-guided stereotactic cingulotomy and discuss the indications, results, and complications of this procedure. A retrospective analysis of psychiatric outcome was performed for 34 patients with intractable major affective disorder and/or obsessive-compulsive disorder who underwent MR image-guided stereotactic cingulotomy since 1991. Fourteen patients underwent multiple cingulotomies (50 total procedures). Overall, 38% of the patients were classified as responders, 23% as possible responders, and 38% as nonresponders. Of the patients who did not respond to initial cingulotomies and who underwent multiple cingulotomies, 36% became responders, 36% possible responders, and 28% nonresponders. There were no deaths or long-term side effects related to the procedure. The therapeutic results of MR image-guided stereotactic cingulotomy are similar to the results of earlier methods of cingulotomy, and the use of MR imaging offers substantial technical advantages. This procedure also compares favorably with other neurosurgical procedures performed for intractable psychiatric disease with a low rate of undesired side effects. Cingulotomy is safe and well tolerated, with over one-third of the patients demonstrating significant improvement; however, prospective long-term follow-up studies are needed to further define the role of surgery in treating intractable psychiatric disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1227/00006123-199606000-00001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anterior cingulotomies compromise the cingulum but cause additional cortical damage, principally in area 24.

    “The advent of computerised tomography and subsequent MR imaging, confirmed that although anterior cingulotomies do compromise the cingulum (Steele et al., 2008; Turner., 1973), they cause additional cortical damage, principally in area 24 (Spangler et al., 1996; Steele et al., 2008).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Spangler et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spangler, W. J., Cosgrove, G. R., Ballantine, H. T., Cassem, E. H., Rauch, S. L., Nierenberg, A., & Price, B. H.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Neurosurgery
Published
1996-06
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
1071-1078
ISSN
0148-396X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4233593702
Cited by
130
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
major affective disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, procedural safety, treatment response
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Brain Mapping, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Reoperation, Stereotaxic Techniques, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review