The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Par-complex proteins promote proliferative progenitor divisions in the developing mouse cerebral cortex
Abstract
The size of brain regions depends on the balance between proliferation and differentiation. During development of the mouse cerebral cortex, ventricular zone (VZ) progenitors, neuroepithelial and radial glial cells, enlarge the progenitor pool by proliferative divisions, while basal progenitors located in the subventricular zone (SVZ) mostly divide in a differentiative mode generating two neurons. These differences correlate to the existence of an apico-basal polarity in VZ, but not SVZ, progenitors. Only VZ progenitors possess an apical membrane domain at which proteins of the Par complex are strongly enriched. We describe a prominent decrease in the amount of Par-complex proteins at the apical surface during cortical development and examine the role of these proteins by gain- and loss-of-function experiments. Par3 (Pard3) loss-of-function led to premature cell cycle exit, reflected in reduced clone size in vitro and the restriction of the progeny to the lower cortical layers in vivo. By contrast, Par3 or Par6 (Pard6α)overexpression promoted the generation of Pax6+ self-renewing progenitors in vitro and in vivo and increased the clonal progeny of single progenitors in vitro. Time-lapse video microscopy revealed that a change in the mode of cell division, rather than an alteration of the cell cycle length, causes the Par-complex-mediated increase in progenitors. Taken together, our data demonstrate a key role for the apically located Par-complex proteins in promoting self-renewing progenitor cell divisions at the expense of neurogenic differentiation in the developing cerebral cortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification of Cerebral Cortical Areas
Rakic, P. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3291116 · Cited by 3,127 · cited 4×
“This concept, formulated by Rakic (Rakic, 1988), tries to explain the enlargement of the cerebral cortex observed during evolution as well as the differences in size of distinct brain areas.”
BackgroundInfluentialNoctor, S. C., Martínez-Cerdeño, V., Ivic, L., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1172 · Cited by 2,229
The cell biology of neurogenesis
Götz, M., & Huttner, W. B. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1739 · Cited by 2,130
Self-citationEnglund, C., Fink, A., Lau, C., Pham, D., Daza, R. A. M., Bulfone, A., Kowalczyk, T., & Hevner, R. F. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2899-04.2005 · Cited by 1,261
The cell-polarity protein Par6 links Par3 and atypical protein kinase C to Cdc42
Joberty, G., Petersen, C., Gao, L., & Macara, I. G. (2000) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35019573 · Cited by 928 · cited 1×
“We next examined whether Par6, another Par protein in the Par complex linking Par3 and aPKC to Cdc42 (Joberty et al., 2000), might have similar effects upon overexpression in cortical progenitors.”
BackgroundA single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis
Clayton, E., Doupé, D. P., Klein, A. M., Winton, D. J., Simons, B. D., & Jones, P. H. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05574 · Cited by 853
Smart, I. H. M. (2002) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/12.1.37 · Cited by 687
Cell-cycle control and cortical development
Dehay, C., & Kennedy, H. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2097 · Cited by 655 · cited 2×
“Indeed, considerably enlarged upper cortical layers characterize the primary visual area of the cortex in primates (for a review, see Dehay and Kennedy, 2007).”
Background
Cited by
Development and Evolution of the Human Neocortex
Lui, J. H., Hansen, D. V., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.030 · Cited by 1,342
OSVZ progenitors of human and ferret neocortex are epithelial-like and expand by integrin signaling
Fietz, S. A., Kelava, I., Vogt, J., Wilsch-Bräuninger, M., Stenzel, D., Fish, J. L., Corbeil, D., Riehn, A., Distler, W., Nitsch, R., et al. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2553 · Cited by 830
Establishment of axon-dendrite polarity in developing neurons.
Barnes, A. P., & Polleux, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125536 · Cited by 523
Wang, J., Gallagher, D., DeVito, L. M., Cancino, G. I., Tsui, D., He, L., Keller, G. M., Frankland, P. W., Kaplan, D. R., & Miller, F. D. (2012) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.016 · Cited by 474
Directing Astroglia from the Cerebral Cortex into Subtype Specific Functional Neurons
Heinrich, C., Blum, R., Gascón, S., Masserdotti, G., Tripathi, P., Sánchez, R., Tiedt, S., Schroeder, T., Götz, M., & Berninger, B. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000373 · Cited by 465
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Costa, M. R., Wen, G., Lepier, A., Schroeder, T., & Götz, M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-22
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2171445737
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.