The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inactivation of aPKCλ results in the loss of adherens junctions in neuroepithelial cells without affecting neurogenesis in mouse neocortex
Abstract
In developing mammalian telencephalon, the loss of adherens junctions and cell cycle exit represent crucial steps in the differentiation of neuroepithelial cells into neurons, but the relationship between these cellular events remains obscure. Atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) is known to contribute to junction formation in epithelial cells and to cell fate determination for Drosophila neuroblasts. To elucidate the functions of aPKCλ, one out of two aPKC members, in mouse neocortical neurogenesis, a Nestin-Cre mediated conditional gene targeting system was employed. In conditional aPKCλ knockout mice, neuroepithelial cells of the neocortical region lost aPKCλ protein at embryonic day 15 and demonstrated a loss of adherens junctions, retraction of apical processes and impaired interkinetic nuclear migration that resulted in disordered neuroepithelial tissue architecture. These results are evidence that aPKCλ is indispensable for the maintenance of adherens junctions and may function in the regulation of adherens junction integrity upon differentiation of neuroepithelial cells into neurons. In spite of the loss of adherens junctions in the neuroepithelium of conditional aPKCλ knockout mice, neurons were produced at a normal rate. Therefore, we concluded that, at least in the later stages of neurogenesis, regulation of cell cycle exit is independent of adherens junctions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noctor, S. C., Martínez-Cerdeño, V., Ivic, L., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1172 · Cited by 2,229
The cell biology of neurogenesis
Götz, M., & Huttner, W. B. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1739 · Cited by 2,130
Macara, I. G. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1332 · Cited by 341
Yamanaka, T., Horikoshi, Y., Suzuki, A., Sugiyama, Y., Kitamura, K., Maniwa, R., Nagai, Y., Yamashita, A., Hirose, T., Ishikawa, H., et al. (2001) · Genes to Cells · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00453.x · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Cited by
The Glial Nature of Embryonic and Adult Neural Stem Cells
Kriegstein, A., & Alvarez-Buylla, A. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135600 · Cited by 2,475
Development and Evolution of the Human Neocortex
Lui, J. H., Hansen, D. V., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.030 · Cited by 1,342
Wang, J., Gallagher, D., DeVito, L. M., Cancino, G. I., Tsui, D., He, L., Keller, G. M., Frankland, P. W., Kaplan, D. R., & Miller, F. D. (2012) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.016 · Cited by 474
Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation
Doe, C. Q. (2008) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.014977 · Cited by 420
Rašin, M.-R., Gazula, V.-R., Breunig, J. J., Kwan, K. Y., Johnson, M. B., Liu-Chen, S., Li, H.-S., Jan, L. Y., Jan, Y.-N., Rakic, P., et al. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1924 · Cited by 316
N-cadherin mediates cortical organization in the mouse brain
Kadowaki, M., Nakamura, S., Machon, O., Krauss, S., Radice, G. L., & Takeichi, M. (2007) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.014 · Cited by 301
Cdk5rap2 exposes the centrosomal root of microcephaly syndromes
Megraw, T. L., Sharkey, J. T., & Nowakowski, R. S. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.007 · Cited by 124
Zhang, J., Shemezis, J. R., McQuinn, E. R., Wang, J., Sverdlov, M., & Chenn, A. (2013) · Neural Development · doi:10.1186/1749-8104-8-7 · Cited by 107
Shibasaki, T., Tokunaga, A., Sakamoto, R., Sagara, H., Noguchi, S., Sasaoka, T., & Yoshida, N. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs161 · Cited by 60
Self-citationHuang, C., Liu, T., Wang, Q., Hou, W., Zhou, C., Song, Z., Shi, Y. S., Gao, X., Chen, G., Yin, Z., et al. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa042 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Imai, F., Hirai, S.-I., Akimoto, K., Koyama, H., Miyata, T., Ogawa, M., Noguchi, S., Sasaoka, T., Noda, T., & Ohno, S.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1735-1744
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2147369750
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.