The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative analysis of mouse and human placentae across gestation reveals species-specific regulators of placental development
Open accessAbstract
An increasing body of evidence points to significant spatio-temporal differences in early placental development between mouse and human, but a detailed comparison of placentae in these two species is missing. We set out to compare placentae from both species across gestation, with a focus on trophoblast progenitor markers. We found that CDX2 and ELF5, but not EOMES, are expressed in early post-implantation trophoblast subpopulations in both species. Genome-wide expression profiling of mouse and human placentae revealed clusters of genes with distinct co-expression patterns across gestation. Overall, there was a closer fit between patterns observed in the placentae when the inter-species comparison was restricted to human placentae through gestational week 16 (thus, excluding full-term samples), suggesting that the developmental timeline in mouse runs parallel to the first half of human placental development. In addition, we identified VGLL1 as a human-specific marker of proliferative cytotrophoblast, where it is co-expressed with the transcription factor TEAD4. As TEAD4 is involved in trophectoderm specification in the mouse, we posit a regulatory role for VGLL1 in early events during human placental development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository
Edgar, R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207 · Cited by 13,288
REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms
Supek, F., Bošnjak, M., Škunca, N., & Šmuc, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021800 · Cited by 6,264
Hemberger, M., Udayashankar, R., Tesar, P., Moore, H., & Burton, G. J. (2010) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddq128 · Cited by 181
Vaudin, P., Delanoue, R., Davidson, I., Silber, J., & Zider1, A. (1999) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.126.21.4807 · Cited by 133
ARID3A is required for mammalian placenta development
Rhee, C., Edwards, M., Dang, C., Harris, J., Brown, M., Kim, J., & Tucker, H. O. (2017) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.12.003 · Cited by 42
Cited by
Development of the human placenta
Turco, M. Y., & Moffett, A. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.163428 · Cited by 698
Haider, S., Meinhardt, G., Saleh, L., Kunihs, V., Gamperl, M., Kaindl, U., Ellinger, A., Burkard, T. R., Fiala, C., Pollheimer, J., et al. (2018) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.07.004 · Cited by 417
Animal models of human pregnancy and placentation: alternatives to the mouse
Carter, A. M. (2020) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-20-0354 · Cited by 130
Sex at the interface: the origin and impact of sex differences in the developing human placenta
Braun, A. E., Mitchel, O. R., Gonzalez, T. L., Sun, T., Flowers, A. E., Pisarska, M. D., & Winn, V. D. (2022) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-022-00459-7 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Soncin, F., Khater, M., To, C., Pizzo, D., Farah, O., Wakeland, A., Arul Nambi Rajan, K., Nelson, K. K., Chang, C.-W., Moretto-Zita, M., Natale, D. R., Laurent, L. C., & Parast, M. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2018-01-15
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2786428929
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.