The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing
Abstract
SUMMARY: In the present study, a computational investigation was carried out to understand the influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. A flexible, two-dimensional, two-link model moving within a viscous fluid was considered. The Navier–Stokes equations governing the fluid dynamics were solved together with the equations governing the structural dynamics by using a strongly coupled fluid–structure interaction scheme. Harmonic kinematics was used to prescribe the motions of one of the links, thus effectively reducing the wing to a single degree-of-freedom oscillator. The wing's flexibility was characterized by the ratio of the flapping frequency to the natural frequency of the structure. Apart from the rigid case, different values of this frequency ratio (only in the range of 1/2 to 1/6) were considered at the Reynolds numbers of 75, 250 and 1000. It was found that flexibility can enhance aerodynamic performance and that the best performance is realized when the wing is excited by a non-linear resonance at 1/3 of the natural frequency. Specifically, at Reynolds numbers of 75, 250 and 1000, the aerodynamic performance that is characterized by the ratio of lift coefficient to drag coefficient is respectively increased by 28%, 23% and 21% when compared with the corresponding ratios of a rigid wing driven with the same kinematics. For all Reynolds numbers, the lift generated per unit driving power is also enhanced in a similar manner. The wake capture mechanism is enhanced, due to a stronger flow around the wing at stroke reversal, resulting from a stronger end of stroke vortex at the trailing edge. The present study provides some clues about how flexibility affects the aerodynamic performance in low Reynolds number flapping flight. In addition, it points to the importance of considering non-linear resonances for enhancing aerodynamic performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wing Rotation and the Aerodynamic Basis of Insect Flight
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O., & Sane, S. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 · Cited by 2,645
Applied Nonlinear Dynamics: Analytical, Computational, and Experimental Methods
Nayfeh, A. H., & Balachandran, B. (1995) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527617548 · Cited by 1,985
Self-citationLeading-edge vortices in insect flight
Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P., & Thomas, A. L. R. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384626a0 · Cited by 1,750
An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows
Uhlmann, M. (2005) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.017 · Cited by 1,694
Applied nonlinear dynamics: analytical, computational, and experimental methods
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-6286 · Cited by 1,181
The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight
Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.8.1087 · Cited by 775
The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles
Ellington, C. P. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.202.23.3439 · Cited by 764
Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion
Sun, M., & Tang, J. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.1.55 · Cited by 566
Wang, Z. J., Birch, J. M., & Dickinson, M. H. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.00739 · Cited by 509
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirements
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0054 · Cited by 476
Cited by
Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.-K., Cesnik, C. E. S., & Liu, H. (2010) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.01.001 · Cited by 986
Tytell, E. D., Hsu, C.-Y., Williams, T. L., Cohen, A. H., & Fauci, L. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1011564107 · Cited by 300
Scaling the propulsive performance of heaving flexible panels
Quinn, D. B., Lauder, G. V., & Smits, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.597 · Cited by 256
Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight
Miller, L. A., & Peskin, C. S. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.028662 · Cited by 179
Relationship between wingbeat frequency and resonant frequency of the wing in insects
Ha, N. S., Truong, Q. T., Goo, N. S., & Park, H. C. (2013) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3182/8/4/046008 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanella, M., Fitzgerald, T., Preidikman, S., Balaras, E., & Balachandran, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 212
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-105
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2080151711
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 27.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.016428
- The paper
- Vanella, M., Fitzgerald, T., Preidikman, S., Balaras, E., & Balachandran, B. (2009). Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.016428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.