Cited by 126Education during COVID-19 pandemicOnline and Blended LearningOnline Learning Methods and Innovations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zooming to Class? Experimental Evidence on College Students’ Online Learning during COVID-19

Open access
Kofoed, Michael S., Gebhart, Lucas, Gilmore, Dallas, Moschitto, Ryan·2024·American Economic Review: Insights

Abstract

One persistent question in higher education is the efficacy of online education. In the fall of 2020, we randomized 551 West Point students in a required introductory economics course across 12 instructors to either an online or in-person class as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Final grades for online students dropped by 0.215 standard deviations, a result apparent in both assignments and exams and largest for academically at-risk students. A postcourse survey finds that online students struggled to concentrate in class and felt less connected to their instructors and peers. Our results show detrimental effects for online learning. (JEL A22, I12, I23, I26)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aeri.20230077

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Goodman Joshua, 2021, Education Next, 21, 38
  2. 2020, Annenberg Institute at Brown University EdWorkingPaper, 20
  3. Crow, Michael M., and William B. Dabars. 2015. Designing the New American University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  4. Russell, Thomas L., ed. 1999. The No Significant Difference Phenomenon as Reported in 355 Research Reports, Summaries and Papers. Raleigh: North Carolina State University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 126

Metadata

Authors
Kofoed, M. S., Gebhart, L., Gilmore, D., & Moschitto, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • United States Department of the Army (US)
  • United States Military Academy (US)
Venue
American Economic Review: Insights
Published
2024-09-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
324-340
ISSN
  • 2640-205X (ISSN-L)
  • 2640-2068
OpenAlex
W3161958558
Cited by
125
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25
FWCI
73.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Review Insights (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Defense
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online Learning Methods and Innovations
Keywords
online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, university students, economics education, face-to-face teaching, student performance, student engagement, teacher-student relationship, peer connection, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review