Cited by 402Education during COVID-19 pandemicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsSchool Choice and Performance

Inequality in household adaptation to schooling shocks: Covid-induced online learning engagement in real time

Open access
Bacher-Hicks, Andrew, Goodman, Joshua, Mulhern, Christine·2021·Journal of Public Economics

Abstract

We use high frequency internet search data to study in real time how US households sought out online learning resources as schools closed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. By April 2020, nationwide search intensity for both school- and parent-centered online learning resources had roughly doubled relative to pre-Covid levels. Areas of the country with higher income, better internet access and fewer rural schools saw substantially larger increases in search intensity. The pandemic will likely widen achievement gaps along these dimensions given schools' and parents' differing engagement with online resources to compensate for lost school-based learning time. Accounting for such differences and promoting more equitable access to online learning could improve the effectiveness of education policy responses to the pandemic. The public availability of internet search data allows our analyses to be updated when schools reopen and to be replicated in other countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104345

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bacher et al. stated that students in rural communities will require more support to bridge the academic gap experienced with their peers who live in urban settings.

    “Furthermore, there were no academic performance variations between rural and urban learners [46], this finding varied with the finding of Bacher et al. [47] who stated that students in rural communities will require more support to bridge the academic gap experienced with their peers who live in urban settings.”

    From Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion says students in rural communities are likely to need additional support and links improved access to preventing wider achievement gaps. The Results show lower growth in searches for learning resources in areas with more rural schools, but the paper does not establish an academic-performance gap between rural and urban students. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The results confirm the fears held by many that school closures would cause socioeconomic gaps to widen.

    “Our results show that learning loss was particularly pronounced for students from disadvantaged homes, confirming the fears held by many that school closures would cause socioeconomic gaps to widen (51 –55).”

    From Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Introduction reports that school closures widened socioeconomic gaps in searches for online learning resources. The Discussion says this pattern suggests academic gaps will be wider in future school years, but the paper does not establish that closures had already widened learning-loss gaps; its measured outcome is primarily search engagement. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bacher-Hicks, A., Goodman, J., & Mulhern, C.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Bacher-Hicks, Andrew
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
193
Pages
104345
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3043391138
Cited by
402
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 8
FWCI
100.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Brown Digital Repository
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, online learning, school closures, household adaptation, educational inequality, achievement gap, internet search data, internet access, rural schools, income inequality, parental engagement, education policy, real-time data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review