The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
Abstract
The Stern Review calls for immediate decisive action to stabilize greenhouse gases because “the benefits of strong, early action on climate change outweighs the costs.” The economic analysis supporting this conclusion consists mostly of two basic strands. The first strand is a formal aggregative model that relies for its conclusions primarily upon imposing a very low discount rate. Concerning this discount-rate aspect, I am skeptical of the Review's formal analysis, but this essay points out that we are actually a lot less sure about what interest rate should be used for discounting climate change than is commonly acknowledged. The Review's second basic strand is a more intuitive argument that it might be very important to avoid possibly large uncertainties that are difficult to quantify. Concerning this uncertainty aspect, I argue that it might be recast into sound analytical reasoning that might justify some of the Review's conclusions. The basic issue here is that spending money to slow global warming should perhaps not be conceptualized primarily as being about consumption smoothing as much as being about how much insurance to buy to offset the small change of a ruinous catastrophe that is difficult to compensate by ordinary savings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This judgement of Weitzman's is an ethical one, because it is about how governments ought to behave towards future generations.”
From The most important thing about climate change (2010) · cites this paper as Weitzman (2007)
Citations
Cites
On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,791
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Dasgupta Partha, 2007, National Institute Economic Review, 199, 4, 10.1177/0027950107077111 · DOI
- Hope Chris, 2006, Integrated Assessment, 6, 19
- Kelly David L, 1999, H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: Elgar, 171
- Mendelsohn Robert O, 2007, Regulation, 29, 40
- 10.1257/jel.45.3.686 · DOI
- Tol Richard S. J., 2006, World Economics, 7, 233
- 10.1126/science.1131728 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,001
Globalisation, transport and the environment
Braathens, N.-A. (2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6975 · Cited by 35
How deep should the deep cuts be? Optimal CO 2 emissions over time under uncertainty
Hope, C. (2009) · Climate Policy · doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0544 · Cited by 39
Telling stories with models and making policy with stories: an exploration
Beck, M. (2017) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2017.1404439 · Cited by 61
“The RICE model was first developed in 1996 by economists William Nordhaus and Zili Yang.”
BackgroundInfluentialHow strong is public support for unilateral climate policy and what drives it?
McGrath, L. F., & Bernauer, T. (2017) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.484 · Cited by 40
2C or not 2CPreprint
Guivarch, C., & Hallegatte, S. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1988201 · Cited by 38
Discounting behavior and environmental decisions.
Carson, R. T., & Tran, B. R. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/a0017685 · Cited by 37
“Weitzman (2007) argues that Stern (2007) got things right but for the wrong reason.”
BackgroundThe Stern Review and the economics of climate change: an editorial essay
Yohe, G., & Tol, R. (2008) · doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9431-z · Cited by 38
Nocera, S., & Tonin, S. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04630-3_9 · Cited by 38
Jasanoff, S. (2021) · doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1859743 · Cited by 37
Venturing into uncharted financial waters: an essay on climate-friendly finance
Hourcade, J., Perrissin-Fabert, B., & Rozenberg, J. (2012) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-012-9169-y · Cited by 37
“22 Beyond the pending debate between the normative low rate (Stern 2006) and a rate consistent with observed behaviors (Nordhaus 2007), we remind the reader that in integrated assessment models the discounting is in fact dominated by key parameters of economic scenarios and assumptions about damage (Weitzman 2009); St…”
BackgroundU.S. Energy Tax Policy: How Much Should Highway Fuels Be Taxed?
Parry, I. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921865.012 · Cited by 37
“Others (e.g., Nordhaus 2007) view market discounting as essential for meaningful policy analysis (i.e., to avoid perverse policy implications in other contexts).”
Justifying precautionary policies: Incommensurability and uncertainty
Aldred, J. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.006 · Cited by 36
Zhang, T., Williams, A., Phade, S. R., Srinivasa, S., Zhang, Y., Gupta, P., Bengio, Y., & Zheng, S. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.07004 · Cited by 36
“Notably, DICE models a single global region.”
BackgroundInfluentialAbadie, L. M. (2018) · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.069 · Cited by 36
“…(Editorial, 2016). p These low-probability, high-damage impacts have frequently been discussed in earlier climate change economics literature (Weitzman, 2007, 2009, 2013; Nordhaus, 2011) and are very important due to the huge magnitude of the potential damage from them (Pindyck, 2011). o…”
BackgroundWelfare, Wealth, and Sustainability
Irwin, E., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Randall, A. (2016) · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095351 · Cited by 36
“Among economists and the informed public, discussion of response to catastrophic prospects was intensified by the Stern-Nordhaus debates on climate change in the mid-2000s 19 (Stern 2007, Nordhaus 2007).”
BackgroundJacobs, M. R. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118326213.ch12 · Cited by 122
“Many argued that these were so far in the future as to be incommensurable with the present costs of preventing it: in the future human societies would be richer (because of economic growth) and would develop the technologies to adapt to or otherwise prevent warming (Nordhaus 2007).”
Hof, A., Hope, C., Lowe, J., Mastrandrea, M., Meinshausen, M., & van Vuuren, D. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0363-7 · Cited by 36
“Different views exist on what constitutes the best discounting method, if any, for intergenerational cost-benefit analyses such as climate change policy (Hoel and Sterner 2007; Howarth 2003; Nordhaus 2007; Stern 2006; UK Treasury 2003; Weitzman 2001, 2007).”
BackgroundAggregate economic measures of climate change damages: explaining the differences and implications
Watkiss, P. (2011) · doi:10.1002/wcc.111 · Cited by 36
Accounting for the risk of extreme outcomes in an integrated assessment of climate change.
Gerst, M., Howarth, R., & Borsuk, M. (2010) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.008 · Cited by 36
Discounting dilemmas: Editors’ introduction
Zeckhauser, R. J., & Viscusi, W. (2008) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-008-9055-8 · Cited by 36
“That is half the average 8 The climate change analysis by Stern et al. (2007) is the subject of detailed commentaries by Nordhaus (2007) and Weitzman (2007).”
BackgroundPricing Carbon and Adjusting Capital to Fend Off Climate Catastrophes
van der Ploeg, F., & de Zeeuw, A. J. (2018) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-018-0231-2 · Cited by 36
“It has also been argued that spending money now to slow down global warming should be conceptualised primarily as an issue about how much insurance to buy to offset the small chance of a ruinous catastrophe (Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialClimate change uncertainty, irreversibility and the precautionary principle
Aldred, J. (2012) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bes029 · Cited by 37
Intergenerational equity and the social discount rate
Scarborough, H. (2011) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00532.x · Cited by 35
“For example, in analysing the efficient and inefficient approaches to slowing global warming, the approach of Nordhaus (2007) is to use the estimated market return on capital as the discount rate.”
MethodWP 2009-7 Growth and Climate Change: Threshold and Multiple Equilibria
Greiner, A., Grüne, L., & Semmler, W. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02132-9_4 · Cited by 35
“Weitzman (2007) argues that the outcome obtained by the Stern review heavily depends on the low discount rate that is resorted to in the latter report.”
BackgroundLebdioui, A. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009339414 · Cited by 34
Murakami, K., Itsubo, N., Kuriyama, K., Yoshida, K., & Tokimatsu, K. (2018) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-017-1372-1 · Cited by 34
“…approaches: integrated modeling (i.e., External Costs of Energy (ExternE); New Energy Externalities Development for Sustainability (NEEDS, 2006); Weitzman 2007; Tol 2008) or weighting in LCA (i.e., Environmental Priority Strategies (EPS)(Steen, 1999); Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method based…”
BackgroundMethodHeal, G. (2017) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20151335 · Cited by 94
Gayer, T., & Viscusi, W. (2016) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rew002 · Cited by 34
The Trade-Off between Intra- and Intergenerational Equity in Climate Policy
Kverndokk, S., Nævdal, E., & Nøstbakken, L. (2014) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.01.007 · Cited by 34
Climate Change and Industrial Policy
Naudé, W. (2011) · doi:10.3390/su3071003 · Cited by 35
Stern review on the economics of climate change: implications for Bangladesh
Roy, A., & Haider, M. Z. (2018) · International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management · doi:10.1108/ijccsm-04-2017-0089 · Cited by 19
Discounting, risk and inequality: A general approach
Fleurbaey, M., & Zuber, S. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.05.003 · Cited by 33
“The Stern review on the economics of climate change Stern (2006) has been heatedly debated on this ground (Nordhaus, 2007a,b; Weitzman, 2007; Dasgupta, 2008; Heal, 2007).”
BackgroundPicketts, I., Curry, J., & Rapaport, E. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2012.659847 · Cited by 33
“Changes of less then 28C are generally considered to be a level to which human and natural systems can adjust, while changes of more than 48C are predicted to be catastrophic (Nordhaus, 2007).”
BackgroundClimate Change and Risk Management: Challenges for Insurance, Adaptation, and Loss Estimation
Kousky, C., & Cooke, R. M. (2009) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1346387 · Cited by 33
Human Capital and Climate Change
Angrist, N., Winseck, K., Patrinos, H., & Zivin, J. G. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4379031 · Cited by 32
“…(Carleton and Hsiang, 2016; Graff Zivin and Neidell, 2013; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022; Isen, Rossin-Slater and Walker, 2017; Park, Behrer and Goodman, 2021), with monetized impacts estimated to be as large as 20% of annual global GDP within a generation (Nordhaus, 2007).”
Zhou, L., Shen, G., Woodfin, T., Chen, T., & Song, K. (2018) · doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1314859 · Cited by 32
“Although computing the carbon social cost is controversial and complex (Nordhaus 2007b), Nordhaus (2007a) and Stern (2007) estimated such a cost to be from $9.”
BackgroundInfluentialClimate mitigation roadmap: assessing low carbon scenarios for Malaysia
Rasiah, R., al-Amin, A., Ahmed, A., Leal, W., & Calvo, E. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.145 · Cited by 32
“This landmark agreement comes in the wake of mounting evidence about the dangers of global warming and climate change (Beckerman and Hepburn, 2007; Bonfils et al., 2008; JRC, 2013; Nordhaus, 2007; Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundEconomic analysis of the costs of flooding
Davies, J. B. (2016) · doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1055804 · Cited by 32
“These SDRs can go as low as 1–2%, as seen for example in the Stern Review (Stern 2007), although such low values have been controversial (see Nordhaus 2007; Weitzman 2007; Scarborough 2011; Caney 2014).”
BackgroundAn estimated cost of lost climate regulation services caused by thawing of the Arctic cryosphere.
Euskirchen, E., Goodstein, E. S., & Huntington, H. (2013) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/11-0858.1 · Cited by 32
Some Basic Economics of National Security
Murphy, K. M., & Topel, R. (2013) · doi:10.1257/aer.103.3.508 · Cited by 32
A RAPID ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR UNDERSTANDING THE SOCIAL COST OF CARBON
Newbold, S. C., Griffiths, C. W., Moore, C. C., Wolverton, A., & Kopits, E. A. (2013) · Climate Change Economics · doi:10.1142/s2010007813500012 · Cited by 33
The Opportunity Cost of Climate Policy: A Question of Reference ∗
Rezai, A. H. (2011) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9442.2011.01681.x · Cited by 32
“4The interested reader is referred to Karp and Rezai (2011) and Weitzman (2007) and the references therein. her investments do not contribute to the problem.”
Dynamic interactive effect and co-design of SO2 emission tax and CO2 emission trading scheme
Xiao, B., Fan, Y., & Guo, X.-D. (2021) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112212 · Cited by 31
A Survey of Global Climate Justice: From Negotiation Stances to Moral Stakes and Back
Pottier, A., Méjean, A., Godard, O., & Hourcade, J.-C. (2017) · International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1561/101.00000090 · Cited by 46
“Nordhaus (2007) and Weitzman (2007) in particular questioned the use of a normative discount rate that would not reflect the real behaviour of agents.”
BackgroundCooperation on Climate-Change Mitigation
Mason, C. F., Polasky, S., & Tarui, N. (2017) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.02.010 · Cited by 31
“…ignited a new round of debate about efficient climate change policy, particularly the degree and the timing of emissions reductions (e.g., Dasgupta 2007, Mendelsohn 2007, Nordhaus 2007a and 2007b, Stern 2008, Stern and Taylor 2007, Tol and Yohe 2006, Weitzman 2007, Yohe et al. 2007, Garnaut 2008).”
BackgroundLiving in the Anthropocene: towards a risk-taking society
Zinn, J. O. (2016) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2016.1233605 · Cited by 30
“Even though the report was criticised for a number of reasons (e.g. Byatt et al. 2006; Weitzman 2007; Helm 2008), it was significant due to its impact on the growing social acceptance of the idea that economics needs to take its impact on the natural environment seriously.”
BackgroundChaudhury, A., Helfgott, A., Thornton, T. F., & Sova, C. A. (2014) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-014-9600-5 · Cited by 42
Zero discounting can compensate future generations for climate damage
Davidson, M. (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.018 · Cited by 31
Trading Off Generations: Infinitely Lived Agent Versus OLG
Schneider, M. T., Traeger, C., & Winkler, R. (2012) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1527146 · Cited by 31
“Nordhaus (2007) ignores this second issue when arguing that the details of the ILA specification as well as individual households’ preferences can be neglected as long as the interest rates in the observed decentralized OLG and in the ILA economy coincide.”
InfluentialClimate change economics and discounted utilitarianism
Hampicke, U. (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.028 · Cited by 31
International Inequity Aversion and the Social Cost of Carbon
Tol, R. (2010) · doi:10.1142/s2010007810000029 · Cited by 31
Post-2012 climate policy dilemmas: a review of proposals
Kuik, O., Aerts, J., Berkhout, F., Biermann, F., Bruggink, J., Gupta, J., & Tol, R. (2008) · doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0333 · Cited by 31
“Finally more controversial measures are related to geo engineering options that aim at directly influencing atmospheric processes (Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundUtilitarian benchmarks for emissions and pledges promote equity, climate and development
Budolfson, M., Anthoff, D., Dennig, F., Errickson, F., Kuruc, K., Spears, D., & Dubash, N. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01130-6 · Cited by 30
Time preferences and risk aversion: Tests on domain differences
Ioannou, C. A., & Sadeh, J. (2016) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-016-9245-8 · Cited by 30
Discounting the Distant Future: An Experimental Investigation
Grijalva, T. C., Lusk, J. L., & Shaw, W. D. (2013) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9717-0 · Cited by 25
“…or Weitzman (2007) for some discussion on the interpretation of η and normative arguments for its magnitude; or Stern (2006), Becker et al. (2010), or Nordhaus (2007) for similar discussions on δ. Generally, curvature in the utility function with respect to consumption, income or wealth relates to…”
BackgroundDiscounting under Disagreement
Heal, G. M., & Millner, A. (2013) · doi:10.3386/w18999 · Cited by 30
On the Underestimation of the Precautionary Effect in Discounting
Gollier, C. (2011) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1057/grir.2011.6 · Cited by 30
“If one adds a rate of pure preference for the present between 0 and 2% per year, we obtain the most standard recommendation about the level of the discount rate that exists in the literature (Arrow (1999), Weitzman (2007b), Nordhaus (2008)).”
New Frontiers in the Economics of Climate Change
Dietz, S., & Maddison, D. (2009) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9278-4 · Cited by 30
“…this debate have variously accused each other of ignorance of the body of work on public economics (see Stern, 2008), ‘subconsciously’ undertaking analysis to confirm the policy position of the UK Government (see Weitzman, 2007), and even trying to rekindle the British Empire (see Nordhaus, 2007c).”
BackgroundClimate Change, Social Justice and Development
Barker, T., Scrieciu, S., & Taylor, D. (2008) · doi:10.1057/dev.2008.33 · Cited by 30
Godard, O. (2008) · doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-17-2008 · Cited by 30
“In the same spirit Thomas Sterner and Martin Persson (2007) have showed that letting prices to be adjusted to the increasing scarcity of natural, non producible assets would lead to results at least equivalent and presumably significantly more stringent than those of the Stern Review17.”
InfluentialLimits to adaptation: Building an integrated research agenda
Berkhout, F., & Dow, K. M. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.817 · Cited by 45
Understanding Risks and Uncertainties in Energy and Climate Policy
Doukas, H., Flamos, A., & Lieu, J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03152-7 · Cited by 78
“…im at e se ns iti vi ty ,d is co un t ra te (V on B el ow an d P er ss on 20 08 ) W IT C H ✓ S ce na ri o an al ys is (2 00 5 ve rs io n) M on te C ar lo an al ys is (2 00 8 ve rs io n) A ba te m en t co st s (B os et ti et al .2 00 8) 22 A. Nikas et al. (e.g. Nordhaus 2007; Ackerman et al. 2010).”
BackgroundEnvironmental cooperation: contrasting international environmental agreements
Sandler, T. (2016) · doi:10.1093/oep/gpw062 · Cited by 29
“For some key countries, the net benefits from cutting GHGs are negative, especially when present value considerations are taken into account, since costs are immediate and benefits are in the distant future (Nordhaus, 2007).”
BackgroundManaging Forests for Water in the Anthropocene—The Best Kept Secret Services of Forest Ecosystems
Creed, I. F., Weber, M., Accatino, F., & Kreutzweiser, D. P. (2016) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f7030060 · Cited by 37
“However, this assumption is false with irreversible loss of natural capital suggesting that discounting may not be suitable for some types of risks that exhibit thresholds and tipping points [106,107].”
BackgroundBradley, R., & Steele, K. (2015) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12259 · Cited by 29
“A view along these lines, exemplified by Nordhaus (2007) and Arrow (1995a), is that the pure rate of time preference should be determined by the preferences of current people.12 The current generation does of course care about future generations, as is evident in the fact of its willingness to…”
BackgroundThe Social Cost of Carbon with Economic and Climate Risks
Cai, Y.-Y., Judd, K. L., & Lontzek, T. (2015) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.06909 · Cited by 29
“There is a consensus that the choice of discount rate is a major determinant of optimal policy (e.g., Stern 2007 and Nordhaus 2007).”
BackgroundWhat Social Cost of Carbon? A Mapping of the Climate Debate
Fabert, B. P., Dumas, P., & Hourcade, J. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2087456 · Cited by 29
“2The virulent reactions (Dasgupta, 2007; Maddison, 2007; Nordhaus, 2007; Weitzman, 2007; Tol and Yohe, 2007; Yohe, 2006) to the Stern Review (Stern, 2006) reinforce this pessimistic diagnosis.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRobust Control in Global Warming Management: An Analytical Dynamic Integrated AssessmentPreprint
Hennlock, M. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1398905 · Cited by 23
“[42], [43], [44] and [30].”
The Macroeconomic Impact of Global and Country-Specific Climate Risk
Byrne, J. P., & Vitenu‐Sackey, P. A. (2024) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-023-00831-0 · Cited by 45
“While a policy consensus has emerged on climate change, some research questions remain, see Weitzman (2007), Stern (2008) and Pindyck (2021).”
BackgroundFořt, J., & Černý, R. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131079 · Cited by 36
ACE – Analytic Climate Economy
Traeger, C. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3832722 · Cited by 28
Aishan, T., Betz, F., Halik, Ü., Cyffka, B., & Rouzi, A. (2018) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f9040196 · Cited by 28
Psychology and Behavioral Economics Lessons for the Design of a Green Growth Strategy
Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2012) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-6240 · Cited by 26
“Such rational calculation-based approaches will not likely succeed, however, in bringing about sustainable growth, since almost all of the potential benefits and some of the costs of different behavioral options lie well into the future, with the result that the relative expected utility of different options depends c…”
BackgroundFlorio, M., Forte, S., Pancotti, C., Sirtori, E., & Vignetti, S. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.03654 · Cited by 53
“Moreover, to be consistent with the saving rates, the elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption should be higher (Nordhaus, 2007; Weitzman, 2007; Dasgupta, 2007 and 2008).”
Integrated Assessment of Climate Change Impacts
Wing, I. S., & Lanzi, E. (2014) · OECD environment working papers · doi:10.1787/5jz2qcjsrvzx-en · Cited by 23
“With a sufficiently high discount rate, even catastrophic losses that substantially reduce gross world product at the time of their occurrence will appear small in present value terms if the corresponding impacts occur far in the future (Weitzman, 2007; Stern, 2008; NRC 2010; IPCC, 2014).”
BackgroundThe Moral Challenge of Dangerous Climate Change: Values, Poverty, and Policy
Moellendorf, D. (2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.185760 · Cited by 27
Wind, coal, and the cost of environmental externalities
Galetovic, A., & Muñoz, C. M. (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.140 · Cited by 27
Modelling the Climate System: An Overview
Gramelsberger, G., & Feichter, J. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17700-2_2 · Cited by 27
“4 C temperature increase; others suggest a 650 ppm CO2-equivalent (Nordhaus 2007; Tol 2002).”
BackgroundWhat Does Good Science-Based Advice to Politics Look Like?
CARRIER, M. J. (2021) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-021-09574-2 · Cited by 29
Decision Making Under Model Uncertainty: Fréchet-Wasserstein Mean Preferences
Petracou, E., Xepapadeas, A., & Yannacopoulos, A. (2021) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.3961 · Cited by 26
Natural capital: assets, systems, and policies
Helm, D. (2019) · Oxford review of economic policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/gry027 · Cited by 26
Provision of a public good with multiple dynasties
Karp, L. S. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12458 · Cited by 26
“†Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, email: karp@berkeley.edu”
BackgroundOpportunities for and Alternatives to Global Climate Regimes Post-Kyoto
Michaelowa, A. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021112 · Cited by 17
“The majority of researchers, however, finds the Protocol cost-effective for mitigation but insufficiently stringent (126).”
BackgroundModels-as-Usual for Unusual Risks? On the Value of Catastrophic Climate Change
Bommier, A., Lanz, B., & Zuber, S. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2015.07.003 · Cited by 26
“In the context of climate policy, there has been an intense debate about this concept following the contributions of Stern (2007) and Nordhaus (2008); see Weitzman (2007) for example.”
BackgroundThe framing of climate change in New Zealand newspapers from June 2009 to June 2010
Chetty, K., Devadas, V., & Fleming, J. (2015) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.2014.996234 · Cited by 30
U.S. Energy Policy and the Pursuit of Failure
Grossman, P. Z. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511793417 · Cited by 37
Optimal harvesting of fish stocks under a time-varying discount rate.
Duncan, S., Hepburn, C., & Papachristodoulou, A. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.002 · Cited by 26
“…to the discussion and analysis on discounting following the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change (Stern, 2007; Beckerman & Hepburn, 2007; Weitzman, 2007; Nordhaus, 2007; Dasgupta, 2008; Heal, 2009). some reflections on the normative and policy recommendations flowing from our…”
BackgroundSome Basic Economics of Extreme Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781781953280.00016 · Cited by 26
Self-citationCLIMAFIN Handbook: Pricing Forward-Looking Climate Risks Under Uncertainty
Battiston, S., Mandel, A., & Monasterolo, I. (2019) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3476586 · Cited by 25
Consumer valuations of energy efficiency investments: The case of Vietnam's Air Conditioner market
Matsumoto, S., & Omata, Y. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.055 · Cited by 25
“Therefore, the optimal social discount rate given by the Ramsey formula (Weitzman, 2007) in developing countries is larger than that for developed countries.”
BackgroundGalarraga, I., de Murieta, E. S., Markandya, A., & Abadie, L. M. (2017) · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaa513 · Cited by 25
Analytic Integrated Assessment and UncertaintyPreprint
Traeger, C. P. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2667972 · Cited by 26
“It is a widely held believe in the integrated assessment community that it does not matter how we calibrate the constituents of the consumption discount rate, as long as pure time preference and the growth-based component add up to the same overall consumption discount rate (Nordhaus 2007).”
The role of the social cost of carbon in policy
Rose, S. (2012) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.163 · Cited by 25
Ecological intuition versus economic "reason"
Guéant, O., Guesnerie, R., & Lasry, J. (2012) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01541.x · Cited by 25
A review of the role and remit of the committee on climate change
McGregor, P., Swales, J., & Winning, M. (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.007 · Cited by 25
A quantitative minimax regret approach to climate change: does discounting still matter?
Hof, A., van Vuuren, D., & den Elzen, M. D. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.023 · Cited by 25
Stern, N. H. (2010) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00504.x · Cited by 66
On Setting Near-Term Climate Policy While the Dust Begins to Settle
Yohe, G., Tol, R., & Murphy, D. (2007) · doi:10.1260/0958-305x.18.5.621 · Cited by 25
“Weitzman (2007) argues that the Stern estimates undervalue these contributions because the tails of the distributions of our understanding of the climate impacts are so “thick”; in other words, the triangular representations of uncertainty (with their fixed limits) upon which the underlying…”
BackgroundResultRisk aversion and expected utility of consumption over time
Johansson-Stenman, O. (2010) · Games Econ. Behav. · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.07.001 · Cited by 25
Exploring the influencing factors of carbon neutralization in Chinese manufacturing enterprises
Zhu, J., Dou, Z., Yan, X., Yu, L., & Lu, Y. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21386-5 · Cited by 26
“The most important point is that CT can continue to serve emission reduction activities (Nordhaus 2007; AviYonah and Uhlmann 2009; Ojha et al. 2020), generating potential promoting value.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Weitzman, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weitzman, Martin L
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 703-724
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035757940
- Cited by
- 1,024
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 242.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Keywords
- Stern Review, climate change economics, greenhouse gas stabilization, discount rate, uncertainty, cost-benefit analysis, consumption smoothing, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review