The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
Abstract
The Stern Review calls for immediate decisive action to stabilize greenhouse gases because “the benefits of strong, early action on climate change outweighs the costs.” The economic analysis supporting this conclusion consists mostly of two basic strands. The first strand is a formal aggregative model that relies for its conclusions primarily upon imposing a very low discount rate. Concerning this discount-rate aspect, I am skeptical of the Review's formal analysis, but this essay points out that we are actually a lot less sure about what interest rate should be used for discounting climate change than is commonly acknowledged. The Review's second basic strand is a more intuitive argument that it might be very important to avoid possibly large uncertainties that are difficult to quantify. Concerning this uncertainty aspect, I argue that it might be recast into sound analytical reasoning that might justify some of the Review's conclusions. The basic issue here is that spending money to slow global warming should perhaps not be conceptualized primarily as being about consumption smoothing as much as being about how much insurance to buy to offset the small change of a ruinous catastrophe that is difficult to compensate by ordinary savings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This judgement of Weitzman's is an ethical one, because it is about how governments ought to behave towards future generations.”
From The most important thing about climate change (2010) · cites this paper as Weitzman (2007)
Citations
Cites
On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,791
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Dasgupta Partha, 2007, National Institute Economic Review, 199, 4, 10.1177/0027950107077111 · DOI
- Hope Chris, 2006, Integrated Assessment, 6, 19
- Kelly David L, 1999, H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: Elgar, 171
- Mendelsohn Robert O, 2007, Regulation, 29, 40
- 10.1257/jel.45.3.686 · DOI
- Tol Richard S. J., 2006, World Economics, 7, 233
- 10.1126/science.1131728 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
What can catastrophic events tell us about sustainability?
Mavi, C. A. (2019) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.04.008 · Cited by 2
Mikroökonomie heute: ihre Bedeutung im Konzert der Methoden
Weimann, J. (2019) · List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik · doi:10.1007/s41025-019-00120-z · Cited by 1
de Souza, B. S. D., Agopyan, V., Fishmann, A. A., Haddad, E., Santos, B., Corrigida, V., & Catalográfica, F. (2018) · doi:10.11606/d.12.2018.tde-15102018-113337 · Cited by 2
Weather, Climate and Total Factor Productivity
Letta, M., & Tol, R. S. J. (2018) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-018-0262-8 · Cited by 235
“See also Nordhaus (2007), Stern (2013) and Tol et al. (2006).”
BackgroundPareto Optimality and Existence of Quasi-Equilibrium in Exchange Economies with an Indefinite Future
Eveson, S., & Thijssen, J. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.09.005 · Cited by 2
“Instead, we are naturally led to the 1See Stern (2007), Nordhaus (2007), Weitzman (2007), Dasgupta (2008), and Heal and Millner (2013). space of convergent sequences, with the limit representing consumption in the indefinite future.”
BackgroundPositively Gamma Discounting: Combining the Opinions of Experts on the Social Discount Rate
Freeman, M. C., & Groom, B. (2015) · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12129 · Cited by 2
“Suppose instead that the survey responses resulted from within a purely positivist framework, where experts were requested to ‘look carefully at the returns on alternative investments – at the real real interest rate–as the benchmarks for climatic investments’ (Nordhaus, 2007, p 692).”
InfluentialFuzzy Evidential Reasoning Approach for LCMS Competitiveness Evaluation under Incomplete Information
Gong, B.-G., Zhang, X.-Q., Guo, D.-D., & Gui, Y.-M. (2015) · doi:10.1155/2015/949232 · Cited by 2
“Manufacturing enterprises, as a high discharge and high pollution industry, also have high energy consumption, which occupies a larger proportion in the national energy consumption [1].”
BackgroundA Study of Decadal December Temperature Variability in Pakistan
Ambreen, R., Ahmad, I., Sultan, S., Sun, Z.-B., & Nawaz, M. (2014) · doi:10.4236/ajcc.2014.35038 · Cited by 2
Ramsey Rule with Progressive utility and Long Term Affine Yields Curves
Karoui, N. E., Mrad, M., & Hillairet, C. (2014) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1404.1913 · Cited by 2
Is There Space for Agreement on Climate Change? A Non-Parametric Approach to Policy Evaluation
Dietz, S., & Matei, A. N. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2343524 · Cited by 2
Asset Pricing Implications of Macroeconomic Interventions: An Application to Climate Policy
Mehra, R. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2285530 · Cited by 2
“15 See Weitzman (2007).”
Los retos en la adaptación al cambio climático en entornos urbanos
Oltra, C., & Marín, R. (2013) · doi:10.5565/rev/papers/v98n2.498 · Cited by 2
Risk and Aversion in Assessing Climate Policy
Crost, B., & Traeger, C. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2270482 · Cited by 2
Reconciling the science and economics of climate change
Goodstein, E. S. (2011) · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0039-3 · Cited by 2
Évaluer le coût des politiques climatiques : de l'importance des mécanismes de second rang
Guivarch, C. (2011) · doi:10.70675/b62de38dzb9d7z43cbz910cz3ee89b3882cb · Cited by 2
Michl, T. (2010) · doi:10.1080/09538259.2010.510316 · Cited by 2
“The back-to-back reviews of the Review by William Nordhaus (2007) and Martin Weitzman (2007) display some potential confusion about the discount rate created by modern neoclassical economics.”
BackgroundWeber, M., Anderson, J. A., Gomez W., C., Chalifour, N. J., Howlett, M. P., Adamowicz, V., McCarney, G., & Elgie, S. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.7939/r3k649t63 · Cited by 1
“For instance, critics attacked the Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change (Stern 2007) for using too low a discount rate (Nordhaus 2007).”
BackgroundClimate change policy: a theorist's plea to take heed of game theory and ambiguity aversion
Rodrigues-Neto, J. (2008) · doi:10.22459/ag.15.02.2008.09 · Cited by 2
The legal and economic bases for an emissions trading scheme
Stein, L. (2019) · Figshare · doi:10.26180/10064465 · Cited by 2
“In a review of the Stern Review, 42 Weitzman did not challenge the balance of economic instruments suggested but stated that the defect of the Report was that the marginal costs of abatement were too optimistic and the social cost and damage from GHGE were too pessimistic.”
InfluentialModeling of climate financing based on MRICES
Zhu, Q.-T., Wu, J., & Wang, Z. (2013) · doi:10.5846/stxb201203310450 · Cited by 2
Climate Politics as Investment
Wolf, S. (2013) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-94018-2_3 · Cited by 2
How can pure social discounting be ethically justified
Buchholz, W., & Schymura, M. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2217499 · Cited by 2
“…in this debate have variously accused each other of ignorance of basic scienti c knowledge (see Stern (2008)), "subconsciously" undertaking analysis to con rm the policy position of the UK Government (see Weitzman (2007)), or even trying to rekindle the British Empire (see Nordhaus (2007)).”
Rodenhäuser, D., Vetter, H., Schlaudt, O., Held, B., & Foltin, O. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31308-0_13 · Cited by 2
“In ihrer Auswertung extrahieren Parrique 2 An der Methode und den Ergebnissen des Stern Reviews äußerten u. a. die wachstumsorientierten Ökonomen Richard Tol (Tol 2006; Tol und Yohe 2006) und William Nordhaus (Nordhaus 2007) deutliche Kritik.”
The economics of nuclear power
Crossland, I. (2012) · doi:10.1533/9780857096388.1.100 · Cited by 2
Temporal Discounting of Losses
Hardisty, D. J. (2011) · doi:10.7916/d8dv1rtm · Cited by 2
“At a policy level, leading economists assert that "the biggest uncertainty of all in the economics of climate change is the uncertainty about which interest rate to use for discounting" (Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundKostenbasierte Preisregulierung, Realoptionen und Investitionsanreize
Friedl, G. (2011) · doi:10.1007/bf03372995 · Cited by 2
How Nonlinear Dynamics Complicate the Issue of Global Warming
Rosser, J. B. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8828-7_11 · Cited by 2
Quel rôle pour les réductions d'émission de méthane dans la lutte contre le changement climatique ?
Boucher, O. (2010) · La Météorologie · doi:10.4267/2042/31994 · Cited by 3
Furrer, B. (2010) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-006233340
Heterogeneous Patience, Bargaining Power and Investment in Future Public Goods
Fishman, R. (2018) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-018-0291-3 · Cited by 1
Hudson, C. (2026) · doi:10.4337/9781035367078 · Cited by 1
Termination Risk and Sustainability
Engle, R. F. (2025) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.67929/ecgi-fin-1005-2024 · Cited by 1
Is the Sustainability of the External Environment Priced in Commercial Real Estate?
Sheng, H. (2025) · Journal of Real Estate Research · doi:10.1080/08965803.2025.2456343 · Cited by 1
Economic Impacts of Carbon Taxation Modeled Through Deep Learning Techniques
Bohr, T., Caro, C., & Corbett, S. (2024) · International Journal of Finance and Investment · doi:10.54097/1zqt8w89 · Cited by 1
“Such examples have encouraged other nations to consider similar approaches, albeit with varying degrees of success and public acceptance [31].”
Shaken to action: Natural disaster experience and enterprises' sustainable decision-making
Xu, X., Xu, Y., & Zhu, F.-F. (2024) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107728 · Cited by 1
Retail motor gasoline prices and the interest rate on mortgage loans
Gill, B. S. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4641089 · Cited by 1
Medición de impactos socioeconómicos en estudios ambientales: Una aproximación metodológica
Sánchez-Alcalde, L., Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., & Guzmán, A. E. G. (2024) · Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades · doi:10.20983/noesis.2024.1.5 · Cited by 1
“Supóngase que el proyecto tiene una Life of Mine (LOM) de 10 años durante los cuales se ha previsto que se pagará de manera anual las siguientes cantidades de impuestos sobre sus utilidades (en dólares norteamericanos): 595307, 859195, 988553, 1006966, 763992, 713109, 1110283, 691854, 630741, 881528] Utilizando la tas…”
BackgroundInfluentialStated Preference Estimates of the Average Social Cost of Carbon
Ashenfarb, M., & Kotchen, M. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.3386/w32043 · Cited by 1
Imperative of High Quality Climate Change Education for Combating Climate Change Crisis
Odeku, K. (2023) · The Journal of Quality in Education · doi:10.37870/joqie.v13i22.351 · Cited by 1
“This call is essential because the issues pertaining to climate change are generally complex because different people have differing views and opinions on whether climate change is real or not (Nordhaus, 2007)..”
BackgroundEcosystem Protection in China: A New Paradigm under Ecological Civilization
Xu, J.-M. (2023) · Social Sciences in China · doi:10.1080/02529203.2023.2192088 · Cited by 1
Stefanović, D., & Milovanović, D. (2022) · APEIRON: a journal for ancient philosophy and science · doi:10.7251/emc2202585s · Cited by 1
Bartik, T. J., Gormley, W. T., Amadon, S., Hummel‐Price, D., & Fuller, J. S. (2023) · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis · doi:10.1017/bca.2023.20
The Influence of Corporate Restructuring on the Economic Development of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Milovanović, D. (2022) · doi:10.1080/19448953.2022.2037860 · Cited by 1
“economy, great importance is given to innovations and trends of the development of innovative products.(28,29,30) Economics as a profession is undergoing a substantial change regarding the way we think about international trade, development, economic growth and economic geography.”
BackgroundProvisions for Climate Change in Structural Design Standards
Retief, J., & Viljoen, C. (2021) · Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85018-0_21 · Cited by 1
Valuing the Future, Discounting in Random Environments: A Review
Masoliver, J., Montero, M., Perelló, J., Farmer, J., & Geanakoplos, J. (2021) · doi:10.20944/preprints202111.0291.v1 · Cited by 1
Quantifying Responsibility with Probabilistic Causation -- The Case of Climate Action
Hiller, S., & Heitzig, J. (2021) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02304 · Cited by 1
“…the discounting factors to be employed when considering future damages, with the prominent opposition between William Nordhaus and Nicholas Stern [Nordhaus, 2007, Stern, 2010] and its “non-decision” by a large expert panel led by Ken Arrow [Arrow et al., 2013], our account is not directly…”
MethodİKLİM DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ VE DÜNYA MİRASININ KORUNMASI
Güner, N. Ö. (2021) · Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.52273/sduhfd..977953 · Cited by 1
Adverse consequences of economic policy in combating global climate change in the Czech Republic
Pikhart, Z., Pikhartová, Š., & Procházka, P. (2021) · Sociedad y Economía · doi:10.1556/204.2021.00002 · Cited by 1
“As a result, the discount factors for future costs of global climate change have been underestimated, not reflecting real risk premium, which is widely criticized (Nordhaus 2007; Nordhaus and Moffat, 2017).”
BackgroundClimate FinancePreprint
Giglio, S., Kelly, B. T., & Stroebel, J. (2020) · Annual Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3719139 · Cited by 1
“Most of the literature, such as work by Nordhaus (2007) and Weitzman (2007), has instead argued for using rates of pure time preference that are greater than zero, consistent with observed savings and investment behavior (see also the discussion by Arrow 1995).”
Heitzig, J., & Hiller, S. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.07352 · Cited by 1
“Unlike in the ongoing debate in the environmental economics community regarding the discounting factors to be employed when considering future damages, with the prominent opposition between William Nordhaus and Nicholas Stern [33, 38] and its “non-decision” by a large expert panel led by Ken Arrow [2], our account is…”
BackgroundThe land use change time-accounting failure
Dupoux, M. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.017 · Cited by 1
“Roughly, Scenario A is more in line with Nordhaus’ idea of climate policy ramp (Nordhaus, 2007) which promotes a progressive cut in emissions, hence larger cuts in the future, whereas Scenario C calls for more aggressive emissions reductions today as Stern puts forward in his review (Stern, 2006; Stern, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodDudek, K., Siebert, S., Insall, R. H., Machesky, L. M., Kajan, T., ‘Voracity, ‘., & Matyi, L. (2019) · doi:10.2307/jj.29685552 · Cited by 1
Using Genuine Savings for Climate Policy Evaluation with an Integrated Assessment Model
Tokimatsu, K., Dupuy, L., & Hanley, N. (2018) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-018-0292-2 · Cited by 1
“(Portney and Weyant 1999; Stern 2006; Dasgupta 2008; Nordhaus 2007).”
BackgroundHeijnen, P., & Dam, L. (2018) · Dynamic Games and Applications · doi:10.1007/s13235-018-0255-9 · Cited by 1
“Note that one critique of the Stern report [29] has been that it overemphasizes the cost of climate change by choosing a very low discount rate (Nordhaus [26] is the most vocal critic).”
BackgroundIntergenerational equity and social discount rates: what have we learned over recent decades?
Roche, J. (2016) · doi:10.1108/ijse-07-2015-0193 · Cited by 1
Constraint As an Ethical Postulate in the Context of Ecological Limits
Stachowska, I. (2016) · doi:10.14746/eip.2016.1.1 · Cited by 1
“%) investing in climate protection seizes to be profitable in the narrow economic sense (see: Weitzman 2007; Popkiewicz 2012, p. 340).”
BackgroundThe Methodology of Modern Macroeconomics and the Descriptive Approach to Discounting
Vermeylen, K. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2368216 · Cited by 1
Uncertain Growth and the Value of the Future
Masoliver, J., Montero, M., Perelló, J., Geanakoplos, J., & Farmer, J. D. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2355737 · Cited by 1
“[8] Weitzman ML (2007) A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change.”
BackgroundSpaces for agreement: a theory of Time-Stochastic Dominance
Dietz, S., & Matei, N. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2343496 · Cited by 1
“Hepburn and Beckerman (2007), Nordhaus (2007) and Weitzman (2007) are notable critiques of Stern’s approach to pure time preference, while Dasgupta (2007), Gollier (2006) and Weitzman (2007), among others, took issue with his approach to risk aversion.”
'CLIMATE ECONOMICS': THE LITERATURE AND ITS UTILITY
Jefferson, M. (2013) · doi:10.1142/9789814531788_0014 · Cited by 1
Global Environmental Coordination: How to Overcome the Double Collective Action Problematic?
Lane, J. (2013) · doi:10.4236/sm.2013.31013 · Cited by 1
“83 diversity and protecting endangered species, i.e. counter-acting the constantly ongoing depletion of ecological capital (Balmford, 2002; Tol, 2002a, 2002b; Nordhaus, 2007; Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundFabert, B. P., Espagne, É., Pottier, A., & Dumas, P. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2160828 · Cited by 1
“For a backstop price set at $1, 200 /tCO2 in 2005, Comments following the Stern (2006) Review (Dasgupta, 2007; Nordhaus, 2007; Weitzman, 2007; Yohe and Tol, 2007) have mainly emphazised the impact of the so-called unusually low rate of pure time preference of 0.”
Discounting procedures in large engineering projects
Malik, A. (2012) · 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012 · doi:10.1109/syscon.2012.6189495 · Cited by 1
“This low discount rate has already been criticized in [19-20] for being too low.”
BackgroundAn Intergenerational Cross-Country Swap
Padovani, M., & Vanini, P. (2010) · doi:10.1108/15265941011092040 · Cited by 1
HOW RAPID SHOULD EMISSION REDUCTION BE? A GAME‐THEORETIC APPROACH
Pavlova, Y. (2010) · doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.2010.00073.x · Cited by 1
La couverture financière des événements climatiques extrêmes
Michel-Kerjan, E. (2009) · doi:10.3917/re.056.0089 · Cited by 1
Incorporating Sustainability into an Effects-Analysis of Horizontal AgreementsPreprint
Inderst, R. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4098476 · Cited by 5
“91 For instance, the report by Stern (2007) applies a discount rate of 1.4%, while in its critique Nordhaus (2007) opts for a rate of 4.3%.”
BackgroundInfluentialSustainable Development Impacts of Renewable Power: Insights from Three Indian States
Kulkarni, T., Hingne, A., Agarwal, V., & Altamirano, J. C. (2022) · World Resources Institute · doi:10.46830/wriwp.20.00109 · Cited by 2
“However, we use the SCC estimate by Nordhaus as it is more conservative and because others, such as Weitzman (2007), have also proposed discount rate values incorporating uncertainty over long-term time frames in the range of 2–4 percent, which are closer to the value used by Nordhaus (2017).”
MethodEnvironmental Policies to Save the Planet
Lewney, R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56735-4_5 · Cited by 1
Sustainability off the smart grids
Strielkowski, W. (2020) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817770-9.00003-1 · Cited by 1
A probabilistic model framework for holistic life-cycle design of buildings
Chui, S. (2018) · doi:10.14288/1.0372966 · Cited by 1
“Nordhaus (2007) mentions that he uses a rate of 6%, corresponding to the empirical rate of return on capital, or capital growth rate.”
BackgroundInfluentialPreference Representations for Catastrophic Risk Analysis
Ericson, R. E., & Kruse, J. L. (2016) · Studies in economic theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31943-8_3 · Cited by 1
“See references and discussion in, for example, Nordhaus (2007) and Weitzman (2007, 2009a).”
BackgroundSustainable Development: Valuing the Future for the Environment and Equity
Knudsen, O., & Scandizzo, P. (2016) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26952-8_12 · Cited by 1
On Climate Change and Institutions
Erkiaga, I. D. V., & Ikazuriaga, K. A. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137446138_8 · Cited by 1
The Macro- and Mesoeconomics of the Green Economy
Ocampo, J. (2013) · doi:10.1057/9781137333117_8 · Cited by 1
Time-Consistent Emission Reduction in a Dynamic Leader-Follower Game
Pavlova, Y. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-8089-3_27 · Cited by 1
Social discount rates and welfare weights for public investment decisions in Turkey
Sezer, H. (2011) · doi:10.24384/wqb9-dc32 · Cited by 1
The Banking Crisis, Nationalization of Banking and the Mixed Economy
Kitromilides, Y. (2010) · doi:10.1057/9780230285583_10 · Cited by 1
Climate Change, Economic Costs of
Tol, R. S. J. (2009) · Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_71 · Cited by 2
The stern review and the uncertainties in the economics of climate change
Peña, V. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2636-1_16 · Cited by 1
Zins, Zeit und Zukunft — Zu Ökonomie und Ethik globaler Klimamodelle
Paqué, K.-H. (2008) · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-8096-0_18 · Cited by 1
Scientific Ambiguity and Climate Policy
Millner, A., Dietz, S., & Heal, G. (2012) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-012-9612-0 · Cited by 168
“16 η = 2 is advocated in, for example, Nordhaus (2008), Weitzman (2007).”
BackgroundControlling pollution and environmental absorption capacity
Ouardighi, F. E., Benchekroun, H., & Grass, D. (2011) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-011-0982-4
“This result emphasizes another feature of a small discounting rate that was not initially envisioned by the Stern review (Stern 2006; Nordhaus 2007), which is the fact that the monotonicity property of the optimal path to sustainable steady state is ensured by a small discounting rate.”
BackgroundTechnological change and timing reductions in greenhouse gas emissions
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Margaritis, D., & Weber, W. L. (2011) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1007/s11123-011-0232-4
“(Weitzman 2007) Nordhaus (2007) argued that the estimates presented in The Stern Review were at odds with standard economic estimates, mainly because The Stern Review uses a discount rate and coefficient of relative risk aversion among generations that are too low and inconsistent with actual…”
BackgroundPolicy Goals for Improved Water Quality in the Baltic Sea: When do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
Hyytiäinen, K., Ahlvik, L., Ahtiainen, H., Artell, J., Huhtala, A., & Dahlbo, K. (2014) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-014-9790-z
International trade and climate change
Chen, X., & Woodland, A. D. (2012) · International Tax and Public Finance · doi:10.1007/s10797-012-9244-x · Cited by 44
The short-term costs of local content requirements in the Indian solar auctions
Probst, B. S., Anatolitis, V., Kontoleon, A., & Anadón, L. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0677-7
Lecocq, F., & Hourcade, J. (2010) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-010-0589-z
“Thus, (a) the pure time preference (Stern 2007; Nordhaus and Yang 2007; Heal 2007; Sterner and Persson 2008; Hourcade et al. 2009) is no longer the sole determinant of the trade-off between present and future aggregate consumption, and (b) intra- and intergenerational equity cannot be treated separately, since assumpt…”
BackgroundThe simple arithmetic of carbon pricing and stranded assets
van der Ploeg, F., & Rezai, A. H. (2017) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-017-9592-6
“Economists use the social discount rate, SDR, for this, which is a concept that has been hotly debated in climate economics (Stern 2007; Nordhaus 2007; Weitzman 2007).”
BackgroundSatisficing Versus Optimality: Criteria for Sustainability
Lara, M. D., Martinet, V., & Doyen, L. (2014) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s11538-014-9944-8 · Cited by 14
“However, discounting makes this criterion controversial for long-run issues such as climate change (see the Stern Review [Stern, 2006] and the ongoing debate [Philibert, 2006, Weitzman, 2007, Gollier, 2008, Sterner and Persson, 2008]).”
BackgroundFrank, D. M. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1617-3
“These models use the Ramsey equation to determine the discount rate, which, as Jamieson (2014, pp. 118–122) and others have demonstrated, encodes discounted utilitarian value judgments about intertemporal and intratemporal inequality, as well as risk, a third important area of ethical concern and the focus of this pap…”
BackgroundThe Irrelevance of the Risk-Uncertainty Distinction
Roser, D. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9919-x
Enriching Intergenerational Decision-Making with Guided Visualization Exercises
Honey-Rosés, J., Menestrel, M. L., Arenas, D., Rauschmayer, F., & Rode, J. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1786-z
“…appropriate discount rate for future income streams when conducting an inter-temporal cost–benefit analysis (Stern et al. 2006; Tol and Yohe 2006; Nordhaus 2007; Weitzman 2007; Dasgupta 2007) as well as the practice of deriving policy recommendations from global cost–benefit analysis (Spash…”
BackgroundCorrecting the Climate Externality: Pareto Improvements Across Generations and Regions
Hoel, M., Kittelsen, S. A. C., & Kverndokk, S. (2019) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-019-00325-y
“For a discussion, see the Stern Review (Stern, 2007) and the subsequent discussion in e.g., Nordhaus (2007), Weitzman (2007), and Dasgupta (2008).”
BackgroundMatsumoto, S. (2017) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-017-1327-1
What Should a Sustainable Economy Sustain? The case for a just economy
Marglin, S., & Banuri, T. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1057/dev.2013.14
Kakeu, J. (2015) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-015-9917-x
Metadata
- Authors
- Weitzman, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weitzman, Martin L
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 703-724
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035757940
- Cited by
- 1,024
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 242.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Keywords
- Stern Review, climate change economics, greenhouse gas stabilization, discount rate, uncertainty, cost-benefit analysis, consumption smoothing, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review