The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
Abstract
The Stern Review calls for immediate decisive action to stabilize greenhouse gases because “the benefits of strong, early action on climate change outweighs the costs.” The economic analysis supporting this conclusion consists mostly of two basic strands. The first strand is a formal aggregative model that relies for its conclusions primarily upon imposing a very low discount rate. Concerning this discount-rate aspect, I am skeptical of the Review's formal analysis, but this essay points out that we are actually a lot less sure about what interest rate should be used for discounting climate change than is commonly acknowledged. The Review's second basic strand is a more intuitive argument that it might be very important to avoid possibly large uncertainties that are difficult to quantify. Concerning this uncertainty aspect, I argue that it might be recast into sound analytical reasoning that might justify some of the Review's conclusions. The basic issue here is that spending money to slow global warming should perhaps not be conceptualized primarily as being about consumption smoothing as much as being about how much insurance to buy to offset the small change of a ruinous catastrophe that is difficult to compensate by ordinary savings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This judgement of Weitzman's is an ethical one, because it is about how governments ought to behave towards future generations.”
From The most important thing about climate change (2010) · cites this paper as Weitzman (2007)
Citations
Cites
On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,791
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Dasgupta Partha, 2007, National Institute Economic Review, 199, 4, 10.1177/0027950107077111 · DOI
- Hope Chris, 2006, Integrated Assessment, 6, 19
- Kelly David L, 1999, H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: Elgar, 171
- Mendelsohn Robert O, 2007, Regulation, 29, 40
- 10.1257/jel.45.3.686 · DOI
- Tol Richard S. J., 2006, World Economics, 7, 233
- 10.1126/science.1131728 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,001
Discounting and divergence of opinion
Jouini, E., Marin, J., & Napp, C. (2010) · Journal of Economics Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2010.01.002 · Cited by 64
“For instance, concerning global climate change, it has been argued that the strong conclusions of the Stern Review were essentially driven by the low assumed discount rate (see, e.g. Nordhaus, 2007 or Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundSacrifice, Discounting and Climate Policy: Five Questions
Karp, L. S. (2009) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1458887 · Cited by 64
“Nordhaus (2007) illustrates the importance of these discounting assumptions by comparing the results of three runs of the DICE model. Two of these runs use combinations of the PRTP and η consistent with a SDR of about 5.5%. With these values, the optimal carbon tax in the near term is approximately $35/ton Carbon (or…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCOST CONCEPTS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
Paltsev, S., & Capros, P. (2013) · Climate Change Economics · doi:10.1142/s2010007813400034 · Cited by 63
“, how much less we value the future payments in comparison to the present payments of the same size, and there are different views on what the appropriate rate is for climate policy (see, for example, Nordhaus (2007) for a discussion”
BackgroundPushing the boundaries of climate economics: critical issues to consider in climate policy analysis
Scrieciu, S., Barker, T., & Ackerman, F. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.016 · Cited by 63
“Some argue for a significantly positive discount rate and criticise the use of a near-zero discount rate for climate policy analysis (e.g. Nordhaus, 2007).”
BackgroundHuang, Z.-H., & Du, X.-J. (2020) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139769 · Cited by 62
Benefit–cost analysis of non-marginal climate and energy projects
Dietz, S., & Hepburn, C. J. (2013) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.023 · Cited by 70
Policymaking for posterityPreprint
Summers, L., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1266220 · Cited by 62
“The considerations adduced here all make a case for giving more weight to the distant future, taking more actions on its behalf, than would be implied by choosing “reasonable” parameters for the fundamental discounting equation.”
Oddo, P. C., Lee, B. S., Garner, G. G., Srikrishnan, V., Reed, P. M., Forest, C. E., & Keller, K. M. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12888 · Cited by 70
Ocean acidification : a national strategy to meet the challenges of a changing ocean
Assessment, I. (2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-5702 · Cited by 61
The Rising Cost of Climate Change: Evidence from the Bond Market
Bauer, M., & Rudebusch, G. D. (2020) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01109 · Cited by 60
The Political Economy of Health Co-Benefits: Embedding Health in the Climate Change Agenda
Workman, A., Blashki, G. A., Bowen, K., Karoly, D. J., & Wiseman, J. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15040674 · Cited by 62
“For this reason, the 2006 Stern Review—one of the most comprehensive and longer-term economic cost–benefit analyses of climate change—used a comparatively low average discount rate [6], a decision that was criticized by a number of economists [82].”
BackgroundETHICS, EQUITY AND THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE PAPER 2: ECONOMICS AND POLITICS
Stern, N. H. (2014) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267114000303 · Cited by 65
“I set them out explicitly here because it is remarkable how tempting such a procedure has sometimes appeared to be (see, e.g. Weitzman 2007a; Nordhaus 2008; IMF 2012: ch. 4) in the context of climate change.”
BackgroundInfluentialDid the Stern Review underestimate US and global climate damages
Ackerman, F., Stanton, E. A., Hope, C., & Alberth, S. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.011 · Cited by 60
“These estimates were substantially greater than those produced by many other models, leading several critics to suggest that Stern had inflated his damage figures (Byatt et al., 2006; Lomborg, 2006; Mendelsohn, 2006; Nordhaus, 2007; Tol and Yohe, 2006).”
ResultThe social cost of carbon emissions: Seven propositions ✩
Foley, D., Rezai, A. H., & Taylor, L. (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.07.006 · Cited by 59
“Nordhaus (2007) has been adamant about pointing out its implication for the estimation of discount rates and argues that the pure rate of time preference has to be chosen ‘‘descriptively’’, i.e. in away to reproduce interest rates observed in actual markets (Arrow et al., 1996).”
BackgroundNumerical analysis of non-constant pure rate of time preference: A model of climate policy
Fujii, T., & Karp, L. (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.004 · Cited by 59
1 Economics , ethics and climate change
Stern, N. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817434.006 · Cited by 59
“If an ethical observer knows what the future ethical savings rate should be, then there is another link between η and δ. Dasgupta (2006) and Nordhaus (2007) compare the optimal savings rate implied by η=1 and δ=0.1% (as in the Stern Review) with observed savings rates today.”
InfluentialChambers, C. P., & Echenique, F. (2018) · doi:10.3982/ecta14866 · Cited by 58
“g the discussion in the Introduction; the Varian quote, or the survey paper by Nordhaus (2007) for further details).”
BackgroundComplex Evolutionary Dynamics in Urban-Regional and Ecologic-Economic Systems
Rosser, J. B. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8828-7 · Cited by 66
How Should Passenger Travel in Mexico City Be Priced
Parry, I. W. H., & Timilsina, G. (2010) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1238684 · Cited by 58
“Stern (2007) obtains a central damage estimate of $85 per ton of CO2, because he uses a much lower discount rate⎯specifically, zero discounting of future utility⎯than the market discount rate assumed in Nordhaus (2007).”
BackgroundA top-down approach to projecting market impacts of climate change
Lemoine, D. M., & Kapnick, S. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2759 · Cited by 53
Biodiversity valuation and the discount rate problem
Freeman, M. C., & Groom, B. (2013) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-02-2013-1226 · Cited by 57
“As a consequence, the sensitivity of optimal environmental policy decisions to the stance taken on discounting has been at the forefront of the economic debate that has followed from Stern (2007); see, for example, Weitzman (2007a) and Stern (2008).”
BackgroundFour Faces of Public Service Efficiency
Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2013) · doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.725760 · Cited by 57
“Others however have questioned the basis of Stern’s calculations arguing that free markets will price, and then adjust to, the environmental conditions associated with global warming (Nordhaus, 2007).”
BackgroundHow Should Benefits and Costs Be Discounted in an Intergenerational Context
Cropper, M. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2165532 · Cited by 57
“Subjective uncertainty about the trend and volatility in consumption growth, as modeled in Weitzman (2007, 2004) and Gollier (2007), will lead to a declining certainty-equivalent discount rate.”
The Stern Review: A deconstruction
Tol, R., & Yohe, G. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.008 · Cited by 57
Optimal Strategies for Flood Prevention
Eijgenraam, C., Brekelmans, R., den Hertog, D., & Roos, K. (2017) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2395 · Cited by 56
“For example, Weitzman (2007) argues that Stern places too much emphasis on a cost–benefit analysis and too little on the need for societal insurance against low-probability catastrophic events.”
BackgroundVass, M., & Elofsson, K. (2016) · Journal of Forest Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2016.04.002 · Cited by 56
Climate policy under fat-tailed risk: an application of FUND
Anthoff, D., & Tol, R. (2014) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-013-1343-2 · Cited by 56
Incentives and stability of international climate coalitions: an integrated assessment.
Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Cian, E. D., Massetti, E., & Tavoni, M. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.035 · Cited by 56
“Ramsey, 1928; Harrod, 1948; Solow, 1974), Stern (2007) argues on ethical grounds for a near-zero value, while others dismiss this assumption on the grounds that it is inconsistent with actual individual behaviour (e.g. Nordhaus, 2007; Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundLeading with ethics, aiming for policy: new opportunities for philosophy of science
Tuana, N. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9793-4 · Cited by 56
“…who focus on climate policy have begun to argue for the importance of including these low probability, high impact events into models on the grounds that not doing so is to overlook what is potentially the most important aspect of any analysis of the economics of climate change (Weitzman 2007).”
BackgroundManaging the Risks from Climate Extremes at the Local Level
Cutter, S. L., Osman-Elasha, B., Campbell, J. R., Cheong, S., McCormick, S., Pulwarty, R. S., Supratid, S., Ziervogel, G., Calvo, E., Mutabazi, K. D., et al. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139177245.008 · Cited by 100
“Finally, the possibility of lowprobability high-consequence climate change is not fully included in most analyses (Stern, 2007; Weitzman, 2007; Lonsdale et al., 2008; Nicholls et al., 2008).”
Anzolin, G., & Lebdioui, A. (2021) · European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/s41287-021-00365-5 · Cited by 83
Updating the United States Government's Social Cost of CarbonPreprint
Carleton, T., & Greenstone, M. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3764255 · Cited by 54
A new assessment model of social cost of carbon and its situation analysis in China
Tian, L.-X., Ye, Q., & Zhen, Z. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.117 · Cited by 54
Bastidas-Arteaga, E., & Stewart, M. (2016) · doi:10.1080/15732479.2015.1020499 · Cited by 54
“However, others suggest higher discount rates when assessing economic impacts of climate change (e.g. Nordhaus (2007)).”
BackgroundRecent Developments in the Intertemporal Modeling of Uncertainty
Traeger, C. (2009) · doi:10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144242 · Cited by 54
Zero carbon energy system pathways for Ireland consistent with the Paris Agreement
Glynn, J. D. M., Gargiulo, M., Chiodi, A., Deane, P., Rogan, F., & Gallachóir, B. Ó. (2018) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1464893 · Cited by 67
Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment
Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2015) · OECD environment working papers · doi:10.1787/5jrp6w76tstg-en · Cited by 53
“Peasgood (2008) measured the three types of wellbeing for the same population and noted that that, for some people, there were large differences between the various accounts.”
BackgroundGoeschl, T., Heyen, D., & Moreno-Cruz, J. (2013) · heiDOK (Heidelberg University) · doi:10.11588/heidok.00014373 · Cited by 53
“Consequently, a central concern of the literature on optimal climate policy is to determine the optimal scale of abatement efforts vis-à-vis the business-as-usual scenario and thus to determine the optimal intertemporal trajectory of mitigation (Stern 2006; Nordhaus 2007; Tol 2001).”
The Social Discount Rate for Canada Based on Future Growth in Consumption
Boardman, A. E., Moore, M. A., & Vining, A. R. (2010) · Canadian Public Policy · doi:10.1353/cpp.2010.0008 · Cited by 53
“Weitzman (2007) suggests a “trio of twos” giving r = 6 percent.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe most important thing about climate change
Broome, J. (2010) · Public Policy: Why ethics matters · doi:10.22459/pp.10.2010.06 · Cited by 65
Comparison of physically- and economically-based CO 2 -equivalences for methane
Boucher, O. (2012) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-3-49-2012 · Cited by 40
“We will also investigate and discuss the structural uncertainties caused by the damage function in Sect.3.5 While time discounting is almost universal in economic analysis, it is also very controversial (e.g.Heal, 1997; Stern, 2007; Weitzman, 2007; Sherwood, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialDelucchi, M. A. (2010) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.028 · Cited by 46
Energy policy in transport and transport policy
van Dender, K. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.008 · Cited by 52
Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change: A Literature Review
Jamet, S., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2009) · doi:10.1787/224864018517 · Cited by 52
“…of economists (e.g. Ramsey, 1928; Harrod, 1948; Solow, 1974), Stern (2007a) has argued that ethical considerations call for a zero or near-zero PRTP, while others dismiss this assumption on the grounds that it is inconsistent with actual individual behaviour (e.g. Nordhaus, 2007a, Weitzman, 2007a).”
BackgroundPolicies for Reducing Coastal Risk on the East and Gulf Coasts
Glickson, D., & Johnson, S. (2014) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/18811 · Cited by 51
A Dynamic Analysis of Human Welfare in a Warming Planet
Llavador, H., Roemer, J., & Silvestre, J. (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.017 · Cited by 51
“Its commentators suggest higher consumption discount rates (Arrow, 2007, Nordhaus, 2007, Martin Weitzman, 2007: see the debate in the Postscripts to the Stern Review available at www.sternreview.org.uk, as well as the issue of World Economics 7 (4), October-December 2006, and the subsequent Simon…”
InfluentialThe political economy of global carbon emissions reductions
DeCanio, S. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.003 · Cited by 51
“Even if this problem is subsumed in the conventional expected discounted utility approach,Weitzman (2007, 2008) has shown that very deep analytical problems arise because of irresolvable uncertainty about potentially catastrophic and irreversible planetary changes associated with warming.2 Second,…”
BackgroundNewman, J. P., Dandy, G., & Maier, H. (2014) · doi:10.1002/2013wr015233 · Cited by 50
“Many studies have addressed the choice of discount rate [Simpson, 2009; Wu et al., 2010; Azar and Sterner, 1996; Conceiç~ao et al., 2007; Weitzman, 2007; Rambaud and Torrecillas, 2005; Guo et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2010; Cai et al., 2002], and a discussion of the issues surrounding this is beyond…”
BackgroundTrading off generations: Equity, discounting, and climate change
Schneider, M. T., Traeger, C., & Winkler, R. (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.08.006 · Cited by 50
“T. Schneider), traeger@berkeley.edu (C.P. Traeger), mail@ralph-winkler.de (R. Winkler). assessment model DICE.1 Nordhaus (2007) shows that this difference is almost fully explained by the different assumptions on social discounting as summarized in the Ramsey equation.2 Nordhaus himself favors a…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBe careful what you calibrate for: Social discounting in general equilibrium
Barrage, L. (2018) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.02.012 · Cited by 49
Climate Economics: The State of the Art
Ackerman, F., & Stanton, E. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203066317 · Cited by 49
Sensitivity analysis didn't help. A practitioner's critique of the Stern review
Saltelli, A., & d'Hombres, B. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.12.003 · Cited by 49
“Different objections to Stern’s review, from both ecological economics (Spash, 2007) and mainstream economics (Nordhaus, 2007; Weitzman, 2007), retrace a 30-year-old debate between the two sides on the limits to growth (Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1994; Daly, 1997; Solow, 1997; Stiglitz, 1997; Neumayer,…”
BackgroundModeling the Impact of Warming in Climate Change Economics
Pindyck, R. (2010) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1539020 · Cited by 49
Imperfections in the Economics of Public Policy, Imperfections in Markets, and Climate ChangePreprint
Stern, N. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1516252 · Cited by 49
“Let me illustrate by the deeply flawed attempt (see e.g. Nordhaus, 2007 and Weitzman, 2007) to „read off‟ rates for discounting or intertemporal values31 directly from market interest rates: surely an example of the perils of the idea that „all relevant information is in the market price‟.”
The Montreal Protocol at 20: Ongoing opportunities for integration with climate protection
Norman, C. S., DeCanio, S. J., & Fan, L. T. (2008) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.003 · Cited by 53
The methodology of normative policy analysis
Robert, C., & Zeckhauser, R. (2011) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.20578 · Cited by 57
The Time Value of Housing: Historical Evidence on Discount Rates
Bracke, P., Pinchbeck, E. W., & Wyatt, J. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12501 · Cited by 51
Reconsidering development by reflecting on climate change
Winkler, H., Boyd, A., Gunfaus, M. T., & Raubenheimer, S. (2015) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-015-9304-7 · Cited by 47
“Alternative paths of climate policies and consumption are then evaluated using a social-welfare function that ranks different paths’ (Nordhaus 2007: 690).”
MethodSallee, J. (2011) · Tax Policy and the Economy · doi:10.1086/658379 · Cited by 47
How Good Was the Profitability of British Railways, 1870–1912?
Mitchell, B., Chambers, D., & Crafts, N. (2011) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2010.00550.x · Cited by 47
The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation
Hof, A., Bruin, K. D. D., Dellink, R., den Elzen, M. D., & van Vuuren, D. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.007 · Cited by 47
“, impact of climate change on the number of storms or change in mortality) as well as value judgements (e.g., how to monetise non-market damages and how to deal with uncertainty, see Azar, 1998; Dietz et al., 2007; Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundDistributive fairness in paying for clean energy infrastructure
Granqvist, H., & Grover, D. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.012 · Cited by 46
Al‐Amin, A. Q., Rasiah, R., & Chenayah, S. (2015) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.002 · Cited by 51
From Optimal Tax Theory to Applied Tax Policy
Jacobs, B. (2013) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1628/001522113x671155 · Cited by 46
Cost–Benefit Analysis: A Decision-Support Tool or a Venue for Contesting Ecosystem Knowledge?
Hockley, N. (2014) · Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/c1384j · Cited by 45
“Most of the evidence on the influence of CBA comes from the US, where Hahn & Tetlock (2008) show that the results of a CBA seem to have little effect on whether a regulation is adopted.”
BackgroundDRIVING A GREEN ECONOMY THROUGH PUBLIC FINANCE AND FISCAL POLICY REFORM
Jones, B. (2011) · doi:10.1142/s1793993311000336 · Cited by 45
Endogenous Discounting and Climate Policy
Tsur, Y., & Zemel, A. (2009) · doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9298-0 · Cited by 45
“This view has been challenged by Stern (2007), who recommended a more vigorous and early response, giving rise to a lively debate (see Arrow 2007, Dasgupta 2007, Nordhaus 2007, Weitzman 2007a).”
BackgroundInfluentialClimate Economics: A Meta-Review and Some Suggestions
Heal, G. M. (2008) · doi:10.3386/w13927 · Cited by 45
Water risk assessment in supply chains
Schaefer, T., Udenio, M., Quinn, S. E., & Fransoo, J. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.262 · Cited by 44
The complementarity and comparability of climate change adaptation and mitigation
Watkiss, P., Benzie, M., & Klein, R. J. T. (2015) · doi:10.1002/wcc.368 · Cited by 44
Uncertainty and Decision in Climate Change Economics
Heal, G., & Millner, A. (2013) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w18929 · Cited by 55
“In general, the discount rate is a major determinant of future policies, as highlighted by the debate between Stern and the critics of his 2006 report (Nordhaus, 2007; Weitzman, 2007), so uncertainty over discount rates translates into uncertainty about future policies.”
A Tale of Tails: Uncertainty and the Social Cost of Carbon Dioxide
Pycroft, J., Vergano, L., Hope, C., Paci, D., & Ciscar, J. (2011) · doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2011-22 · Cited by 44
“In the modified version of PAGE09, the original distribution of the considered variables is kept, but a different definition of SENS has been introduced, in order to take into account Weitzman’s suggestions. In doing so, the SENS distribution has been modified in such a way that up to its median it is distributed acco…”
InfluentialFrancis, R. A., Falconi, S. M., Nateghi, R., & Guikema, S. D. (2010) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-010-0001-9 · Cited by 44
Designing the climate observing system of the future.
Weatherhead, E. C., Wielicki, B. A., Ramaswamy, V., Abbott, M., Ackerman, T. P., Atlas, R., Brasseur, G., Bruhwiler, L., Busalacchi, A. J., Butler, J. H., et al. (2018) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1002/2017ef000627 · Cited by 44
Social dimensions of fertility behavior and consumption patterns in the Anthropocene
Barrett, S. A., Dasgupta, A., Dasgupta, P. S., Adger, W. N., Anderies, J. M., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Bledsoe, C., Bongaarts, J., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1909857117 · Cited by 58
Technology Transfers and the Clean Development Mechanism in a North-South General Equilibrium Model
Aronsson, T., Backlund, K., & Sahlén, L. (2010) · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.12.001 · Cited by 43
‘Skinning a cat’: alternative models of representing temperature trends
Mills, T. C. (2010) · doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9801-1 · Cited by 43
Prioritarianism and Climate Change
Adler, M., & Treich, N. (2015) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-015-9960-7 · Cited by 42
“Sterner and Persson (2008) amend the DICEmodel by using a utility function that depends upon both consumption and environmental quality, and find that the optimal emission path is highly sensitive to the parameter in the utility function capturing the elasticity of substitution between the two goods.”
Expected utility theory and the tyranny of catastrophic risks
Buchholz, W., & Schymura, M. (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.007 · Cited by 42
Regulating knowledge monopolies: the case of the IPCC
Tol, R. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0214-6 · Cited by 42
“Any national assessment would suffer from a lack of legitimacy in other countries—cf. the cool reception of the Stern Review (Stern et al. 2006) outside Europe.21 Nevertheless, national assessments should be made widely available, e.g., by translation from Russian and Chinese to English.”
BackgroundInfluentialIs a transdisciplinary perspective on economic complexity possible
Rosser, J. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.03.012 · Cited by 42
Genç, M., Ekinci, A., & Sakarya, B. (2021) · Environmental science and pollution research international · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15448-3 · Cited by 41
The comparative importance for optimal climate policy of discounting, inequalities and catastrophes
Budolfson, M. B., Dennig, F., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A., & Socolow, R. H. (2017) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-017-2094-x · Cited by 49
“Weitzman (2007) disagreed strongly with the authors of the Stern Review regarding their choice of normative parameters ( ρ and η ), but agreed to some extent that high levels of effort are warranted if uncertainty is taken into account, with a low probability of very strong damages on aggregate…”
BackgroundInfluentialDISCOUNTING FOR PUBLIC POLICY: A SURVEY
Greaves, H. (2017) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267117000062 · Cited by 41
“In stark contrast, other discussions of climate change (Lomborg 2004; Weitzman 2007; Nordhaus 2008) have tended to use discount rates in the region of 4 − 6% p.a. Stern concludes that widespread and immediate action to mitigate climate change would be cost-effective, whereas analyses such as…”
BackgroundTHE CHALLENGE OF CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION FOR AGRICULTURE: AN ECONOMICALLY ORIENTED REVIEW
McCarl, B. A., Thayer, A. W., & Jones, J. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · doi:10.1017/aae.2016.27 · Cited by 46
Welfare Costs of Long-Run Temperature Shifts
Bansal, R., & Ochoa, M. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w17574 · Cited by 36
Conservation and Human Welfare: Economic Analysis of Ecosystem Services
Fisher, B., Polasky, S., & Sterner, T. (2010) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9415-0 · Cited by 45
“Economists have played a central role in defining the key elements of the debate on climate change following publication of the Stern Review (Stern 2007) and the ensuing debates (e.g., Nordhaus 2007; Sterner and Persson 2008; Weitzman 2007).”
BackgroundMonetary policy uncertainty and ESG performance across energy firms
Abakah, E., Tiwari, A., Abdullah, M., Ji, Q., & Sulong, Z. (2024) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107699 · Cited by 40
How certain are we about the certainty-equivalent long term social discount rate?
Freeman, M. C., & Groom, B. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2016.06.004 · Cited by 40
“Its most famous use stems from Weitzman’s (2001) ‘Gamma Discounting’paper.”
BackgroundMethodClimate change: A threat to the economic growth of Pakistan
Akram, N., & Hamid, A. (2015) · doi:10.1177/1464993414546976 · Cited by 40
“However, Weitzman (2007) has criticized these findings by saying that there are certain uncertainties associated while measuring the impacts of climate change and conclusion are drawn by Stern (2006) are based on assuming a very low discount rate.”
BackgroundIntegrated assessment of climate change: state of the literature
Weyant, J. (2014) · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis · doi:10.1515/jbca-2014-9002 · Cited by 40
“Using a near-zero discount rate of the kind proposed by the Stern Review, the answer is that society should pay a substantial fraction of a year’s consumption today to remove the wrinkle (see Nordhaus, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialClimate Variability and Water Infrastructure: Historical Experience in the Western United States
Hansen, Z. K., Libecap, G., & Lowe, S. (2009) · doi:10.3386/w15558 · Cited by 40
“There is a large and rapidly growing literature on climate change (Stern 2007; Nordhaus 2007; Weitzman 2007 and references therein).”
BackgroundBetween a Rock and a Soft Place: Ecological and Feminist Economics in Policy Debates
Nelson, J. A. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.021 · Cited by 40
Peeters, P. (2017) · Breda University of Applied Sciences Portal · doi:10.4233/uuid:615ac06e-d389-4c6c-810e-7a4ab5818e8d · Cited by 39
Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice
Medvecky, F. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9977-0 · Cited by 38
“Of course, climate change could also be framed as primarily an ethical issue (Gardiner 2011), or as primarily an economic issue (Nordhaus 2007; Stern 2007; Tol 2006).”
BackgroundOn the Physics of Three Integrated Assessment Models
Calel, R., & Stainforth, D. (2017) · doi:10.1175/bams-d-16-0034.1 · Cited by 39
“Economists have previously highlighted several economic modeling choices that can have very large effects on the policy recommendations of these IAMs, including the choice of discount rate (Dasgupta 2007; Nordhaus 2007; Weitzman 2007) and the curvature of the damage function (Ackerman et al.”
BackgroundForest biomass energy: assessing atmospheric carbon impacts by discounting future carbon flows
Timmons, D., Buchholz, T. A., & Veeneman, C. H. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12276 · Cited by 46
“…Review of the Economics of Climate Change (Stern, 2006) used a relatively low social discount rate of 1.4% in concluding that the benefits from avoiding climate change outweigh the costs of avoiding it, although the Stern Review was much criticized for this choice of discount rate (Nordhaus, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialCalculating the Social Cost of Carbon
Hope, C., & Newbery, D. (2006) · doi:10.17863/cam.5125 · Cited by 39
“The extreme sensitivity of the SCC (or the benefit-cost ratio of mitigating climate change) has been remarked on by other authors, including most recently Weitzman (2007),as discussed above.”
ResultHabitat and Resource Equivalency Analysis: A Critical Assessment
Desvousges, W., Gard, N. W., Michael, H., & Chance, A. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.003 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Weitzman, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weitzman, Martin L
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 703-724
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035757940
- Cited by
- 1,024
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 242.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Keywords
- Stern Review, climate change economics, greenhouse gas stabilization, discount rate, uncertainty, cost-benefit analysis, consumption smoothing, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review