The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
Abstract
The Stern Review calls for immediate decisive action to stabilize greenhouse gases because “the benefits of strong, early action on climate change outweighs the costs.” The economic analysis supporting this conclusion consists mostly of two basic strands. The first strand is a formal aggregative model that relies for its conclusions primarily upon imposing a very low discount rate. Concerning this discount-rate aspect, I am skeptical of the Review's formal analysis, but this essay points out that we are actually a lot less sure about what interest rate should be used for discounting climate change than is commonly acknowledged. The Review's second basic strand is a more intuitive argument that it might be very important to avoid possibly large uncertainties that are difficult to quantify. Concerning this uncertainty aspect, I argue that it might be recast into sound analytical reasoning that might justify some of the Review's conclusions. The basic issue here is that spending money to slow global warming should perhaps not be conceptualized primarily as being about consumption smoothing as much as being about how much insurance to buy to offset the small change of a ruinous catastrophe that is difficult to compensate by ordinary savings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This judgement of Weitzman's is an ethical one, because it is about how governments ought to behave towards future generations.”
From The most important thing about climate change (2010) · cites this paper as Weitzman (2007)
Citations
Cites
On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,791
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Dasgupta Partha, 2007, National Institute Economic Review, 199, 4, 10.1177/0027950107077111 · DOI
- Hope Chris, 2006, Integrated Assessment, 6, 19
- Kelly David L, 1999, H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: Elgar, 171
- Mendelsohn Robert O, 2007, Regulation, 29, 40
- 10.1257/jel.45.3.686 · DOI
- Tol Richard S. J., 2006, World Economics, 7, 233
- 10.1126/science.1131728 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,001
On the Relation between Discounting of Climate Change and Edgeworth-Pareto Substitutability
Kögel, T. (2009) · doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2009-27 · Cited by 16
“…Yang (2003) and the model assumption of Tol (2004) is that dual-rate discounting is required for modelling environmental concerns according to Yang‘s assumption, while modelling it according _________________________ 1Among the critics are Nordhaus (2007), Yohe and Tol (2007), and Weitzman (2007).”
BackgroundNadafianshahamabadi, R., Tayarani, M., & Rowangould, G. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.027 · Cited by 16
Climate change mitigation: comparative assessment of Malaysian and ASEAN scenarios
Rasiah, R., Ahmed, A., Al‐Amin, A. Q., & Chenayah, S. (2016) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7985-2 · Cited by 21
“In addition, there is also evidence that the world would experience major geophysical changes in the coming decades as a consequence of human activity, which threatens the longrun sustainability of human civilization (Nordhaus 2007, 2008; Tol 2003; Weitzman 2007).”
BackgroundMacLeod, S., & Filion, Y. (2011) · Water resources management · doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9900-4 · Cited by 16
Åström, S. (2022) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106941 · Cited by 16
Valuing Blue Carbon Changes in the Arctic Ocean
Armstrong, C., Foley, N., Slagstad, D., Chierici, M., Ellingsen, I., & Reigstad, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00331 · Cited by 15
“We have chosen a high and low discount rate of 5 and 3% [following Nordhaus (2007) and Riahi et al. (2017)].”
MethodBuilding up time-consistency for risk measures and dynamic optimization
Lara, M. D. D., & Leclère, V. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.046 · Cited by 15
“Indeed, additivity implies possible compensations between distant generations, and discounting can lead to myopic decisions [21, 22].”
BackgroundDiscounting and relative consumption
Johansson-Stenman, O., & Sterner, T. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2015.01.006 · Cited by 15
Climate change, green growth, and aid allocation to poor countries
Dercon, S. (2014) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru028 · Cited by 15
“Nothing seems to have been more controversial in the environmental policy literature than the discussion on the appropriate social discount rates: how to weigh present versus future costs and returns, in the face of climate change (Stern, 2007; Nordhaus 2007; Weitzman, 2007), and this paper is hardly the place to exam…”
BackgroundState-variable public goods and social comparisons
Aronsson, T., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2014.07.001 · Cited by 15
Affine long term yield curves: An application of the Ramsey rule with progressive utility
Karoui, N. E., Hillairet, C., & Mrad, M. (2014) · doi:10.1142/s2345768614500032 · Cited by 15
The Evolutionary Basis of Time Preference: Intergenerational Transfers and Sex
Robson, A., Szentes, B., & Iantchev, E. P. (2012) · doi:10.1257/mic.4.4.172 · Cited by 15
Democratic Decline and Democratic Renewal: Political Change in Britain, Australia and New Zealand
Marsh, I., & Miller, R. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139198691 · Cited by 15
Species preservation versus development: An experimental investigation under uncertainty
Grijalva, T. C., Berrens, R. P., & Shaw, W. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.002 · Cited by 15
An Economic and Ethical Approach to Charity and to Charity Endowments
Core, J., & Donaldson, T. (2010) · Review of social economy · doi:10.1080/00346760903480517 · Cited by 15
“As a benchmark for income growth, economists (e.g. Arrow et al. 2004; Weitzman 2007) generally use future worldwide income growth rates of 1.5 percent to 2 percent.”
BackgroundInfluentialOn the Collapse of Historical Civilizations
Good, D. H., & Reuveny, R. (2009) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01312.x · Cited by 15
Agriculture and global climate stabilization
Quiggin, J. (2009) · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00494.x · Cited by 15
“This point emerged in discussion of the Stern Review (Stern 2007) While a number of economists disagreed with Stern's treatment of issues such as discounting, they endorsed his conclusion on the need for action to stabilize climate (Weitzman 2007).”
Biodiversity Risks and Corporate InvestmentPreprint
Trinh, H. H. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4587333 · Cited by 15
Saundry, P., & Ruddell, B. (2020) · AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29914-9 · Cited by 15
Abadie, L. M., Galarraga, I., & de Murieta, E. S. (2016) · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa5254 · Cited by 15
Adapting to rising coastal flood risk in the EU under climate change
Michail, V., Lorenzo, M., Ignazio, M., Carlos, C. M. J., Jochen, H., Philip, W., Simon, G., & Luc, F. (2020) · doi:10.2760/456870 · Cited by 14
“We further assume a value of 1 for ρ , which is chosen as a central value between 0, i.e. no preference for current or future generations, and 2, which is the value attributed by Weitzman in is review of the Stern Review (Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundResultPublic Sector Discount Rates: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches
Creedy, J., & Passi, H. (2018) · doi:10.1111/1467-8462.12252 · Cited by 14
“The SRTP approach involves a number of assumptions and value judgements, particularly in relation to the choice of variables in the Ramsey equation. These value judgements need to be made as explicit as possible. Many commentators attempt to set the values of r and u by reference to observed individual behaviour. Howe…”
ResultCost-efficient strategies to preserve dead wood-dependent species in a managed forest landscape
Ranius, T., Korosuo, A., Roberge, J.-M., Juutinen, A., Mönkkönen, M., & Schroeder, M. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.017 · Cited by 14
“There is no consensus regarding methodology for defining likely interest rates regarding environmental benefits that may accrue far in the future (e.g. Nordhaus 2007; Weitzman 2010).”
BackgroundZhu, Q.-T., Duan, K.-R., Wu, J., & Wang, Z. (2016) · doi:10.1080/1540496x.2016.1152794 · Cited by 14
“Considering the current controversy over the discount rate, we set 0.001 and 0.015 (Nordhaus 2007; Stern 2008), respectively, for the discount rate ρ. Figure 7 shows the change rate of the cumulative Ramsey utility function with the above two discount rates during 2025–2100.”
BackgroundInfluentialPreventing Environmental Disasters: Market-Based vs. Command-and-Control Policies
Lamperti, F., Napoletano, M., & Roventini, A. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2709577 · Cited by 14
“…temperature caused by the increasing consumption of fossil fuels, and the appropriate policy responses. e debate is still unse led as some researchers call for major and immediate actions (Stern, 2007), whereas others suggest limited and gradual policy interventions (see e.g. Nordhaus, 2007).”
Cost–benefit analysis: a tool that is both useful and influential?
Atkinson, G. (2015) · doi:10.4337/9781783477043.00018 · Cited by 14
“For example, in the case of assessing the economic burden of climate change, this debate has highlighted fundamental differences between those economists who see a role for the practitioner to make, or reflect, explicit moral judgements about intergenerational equity and those who argue for a more objective approach b…”
BackgroundChiabai, A., Galarraga, I., Markandya, A., & Pascual, U. (2012) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-012-9589-8 · Cited by 14
“As Weitzman (2007) pointed out “it is not an exaggeration to say that the biggest uncertainty of all in the economics of climate change is the uncertainty about which interest rate to use for discounting” The idea of using low social discount rates for natural resource management is not new and has…”
Energy Policy and the Social Discount Rate
Kelleher, J. (2012) · doi:10.1080/21550085.2012.672684 · Cited by 14
“(Weitzman, 2007, p. 712) Wetizman’s own approach holds that the rate at which the value of well-being declines through time ought to be determined by prevailing market interest rates.”
Ecosystem service assessments for marine conservation
Guerry, A., Plummer, M., Ruckelshaus, M., & Harvey, C. (2011) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.003.0017 · Cited by 14
“Calculating this economic value is relatively straightforward ( Chapter 7 ), but settling on the values for some of the parameters is fraught with controversy ( Nordhaus 2007 ; Weitzman 2007 ).”
BackgroundAssessing the Near-Term Risk of Climate Uncertainty:Interdependencies among the U.S. States.
Reinert, R., Stamber, K., Robinson, D., Backus, G., Fogelman, W., Cutler, L., Boslough, M., Finely, R., Siirola, J., Lowry, T. S., et al. (2011) · doi:10.2172/984163 · Cited by 14
“There is a difference between a cost analysis that is used to determine the value of mitigation (e.g., Nordhaus 2007b) and the study here.”
BackgroundInfluentialGlobal Financial Crisis and International Institutions: Challenges, Opportunities and Change
Lane, J., & Maeland, R. (2011) · doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0145-0 · Cited by 14
Ng, Y. (2010) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9880-z · Cited by 14
“Weitzman (2007) correctly mentions that, in dealing with global warming, the expected growth rate should have ‘a thick left tail’ (p. 718), but acknowledges that ‘we lack a usable economic framework for dealing with these kinds of thick-tailed extreme disasters’ (p. 723).4 The next section attempts…”
Backgroundvan Dender, K., & Crist, P. (2009) · doi:10.1787/223773243354 · Cited by 14
Toward a New Risk Architecture: The Question of Catastrophe Risk Calculus
Michel-Kerjan, E. (2008) · Social research · doi:10.1353/sor.2008.0027 · Cited by 14
Discounting and the Time Preference Rate:an introduction
Creedy, J., & Guest, R. (2007) · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2008.00450.x · Cited by 14
“If the possible values are δ i , for i = 1 , ..., D , and they have associated probabilities of p i , Weitzman (2007) showed that the e ff ective consumption discount rate, δ 0 t , applying to period t is obtained not as a simple weighted average of the δ i s but of the discount factors.”
Economic balancing of forest management under storm risk, the case of the Ore Mountains (Germany)
Deegen, P., & Matolepszy, K. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.005 · Cited by 14
The Social Costs and Benefits of U.S. Biofuel Policies with Pre-Existing Distortions
de Gorter, H., & Just, D. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921865.015 · Cited by 14
Domínguez-Iino, T. (2025) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/739325 · Cited by 13
“It proposes a relatively high carbon price of 85 USD per tonne of CO2, which has been criticized due to its use of a near-zero discount rate that is inconsistent with discount rates estimated from market-based returns (Nordhaus, 2007).”
Ramsey rule with forward/backward utility for long-term yield curves modeling
Karoui, N. E., Hillairet, C., & Mrad, M. (2022) · Decisions in Economics and Finance · doi:10.1007/s10203-022-00370-1 · Cited by 13
“The Ramsey rule is still the reference equation in macroeconomics and it was revisited by numerous economists, such as Gollier (2010, 2012) and Weitzman (1998, 2007).”
BackgroundPricing Carbon in a Multi-Sector Economy With Social Discounting
Rausch, S., & Kalsbach, O. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3901691 · Cited by 13
Climate risks, climate economics, and the foundations of rights-based risk ethics
Steigleder, K. (2016) · Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/14754835.2015.1083849 · Cited by 19
“One of the most famous (climate) economists making such an argument is Harvard ’ s Martin L. Weitzman (see, e.g., Weitzman 2007, 2009; Wagner and Weitzman 2015).”
How deep should the deep cuts be? Optimal CO2 emissions over time under uncertainty
Hope, C. (2009) · doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0583a · Cited by 13
“…damages (which are discounted at rates above the pure rate of time preference), does not include some foreseeable impacts, such as large-scale climate migration (Watkiss et al., 2005), and only makes a probably inadequate first approximation of others, such as climate catastrophes (Weitzman, 2007).”
BackgroundSöderholm, P., & Pettersson, F. (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.008 · Cited by 13
Economic models and frameworks to guide climate policy
Hepburn, C. J., Ives, M. C., Loni, S., Mealy, P., Barbrook-Johnson, P., Farmer, J. D., Stern, N. H., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2025) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/graf020 · Cited by 10
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Urban Nature-Based Solutions: A Stepwise Ranking Approach
Panduro, T., Nainggolan, D., & Zandersen, M. (2024) · Nature-Based Solutions · doi:10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100186 · Cited by 12
Inequality Aversion for Climate Policy
del Campo, S., Anthoff, D., & Kornek, U. (2024) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1086/728371 · Cited by 15
“Weitzman (2007) suggests a value of 2, whereas, according to Dasgupta (2008), values between 1.5 and 3 are more reasonable.”
BackgroundInfluentialDiscounting in Natural Resource Damage Assessment
Horsch, E. J., Phaneuf, D., Giguere, C., Murray, J., Duff, C., & Kroninger, C. (2022) · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis · doi:10.1017/bca.2022.24 · Cited by 12
Continuous Cover Forestry and Cost of Carbon Abatement on Mineral Soils and Peatlands
Ahtikoski, A., Rämö, J., Juutinen, A., Shanin, V., & Mäkipää, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.837878 · Cited by 12
“…unsolved issues related to SCC, see Belfiori’s (2017) demonstration on the discrepancy between optimal C tax and SCC, Nordhaus and Boyer (2003), Weitzman (2007), and Stern (2008) for the applied discount rate in assessing and Ricke et al. (2018) for heterogenous geography of climate damage…”
BackgroundDeCanio, S., Manski, C., & Sanstad, A. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4028332 · Cited by 12
Social discounting, social costs of carbon, and their use in energy system models
Löffler, K. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac228a · Cited by 14
Souza, B., & Haddad, E. (2021) · Spatial Economic Analysis · doi:10.1080/17421772.2021.1934524 · Cited by 12
Tuffery, L., Davi, H., López‐García, N., Rigolot, E., Jean, F., Stenger, A., & Lefèvre, F. (2021) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-020-01732-4 · Cited by 12
“…of natural resources and the strong and positive correlation between ecological growth and economic growth (Gosselin et al. 2011), the Stern Review and numerous studies recommend the use of a low discount rate of 1.5% (Weitzman 1998; Stern 2006; Weitzman 2007; Gollier 2010; Freeman and Groom 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialDampha, N. K. (2021) · Sustainability in Environment · doi:10.1080/23311843.2021.1875556 · Cited by 12
Naqvi, S. A. A., Hassan, R. H. U., Wu, W., Shah, A. A., Makhdum, M. S. A., & Shah, S. A. R. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236794 · Cited by 12
SCCs and the use of IAMs: Let's separate the wheat from the chaff
Espagne, É., Pottier, A., Fabert, B. P., Nadaud, F., & Dumas, P. (2018) · The International Economy · doi:10.1016/j.inteco.2018.02.004 · Cited by 12
THE AGGREGATION DILEMMA IN CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY EVALUATION
Schumacher, I. (2018) · Climate change economics · doi:10.1142/s2010007818500082 · Cited by 12
“Before we tend to this in the next section, we will push the theoretical results on the Aggregation Dilemma somewhat further in order to show issues that are similar to those raised by the Dismal Theorem (Weitzman 2014).”
BackgroundResultHyperbolic discounting and the time‐consistent solution of three canonical environmental problems
Strulik, H. (2017) · Journal of Public Economic Theory · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3022578 · Cited by 12
Heilmann, C. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9950-y · Cited by 12
“A number of prominent economists and philosophers have reacted to the ‘Stern Review’, and in particular, the economists invested in the debate have focused on the use of time discounting in the recommendations of the review (most prominently Dasgupta 2006; Tol 2006; Weitzman 2007; Nordhaus 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Political Economy of Mitigation and Adaptation
Habla, W., & Roeder, K. (2017) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.12.008 · Cited by 12
The impact of personal beliefs on climate change: the “battle of perspectives” revisited
Geisendorf, S. (2016) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-016-0461-9 · Cited by 11
Why Chinese discount future financial and environmental gains but not losses more than Americans
Gong, M.-L., Krantz, D., & Weber, E. (2014) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-014-9200-5 · Cited by 12
“Weitzman (2007)#TAB##R# sees#TAB##R# the#TAB##R# biggest#TAB##R# uncertainty#TAB##R# of#TAB##R# all,#TAB##R# in#TAB##R# the#TAB##R# economics#TAB##R# of#TAB##R# climate#TAB##R# change,#TAB##R# as#TAB##R# the uncertainty#TAB##R# about#TAB##R# which#TAB##R# interest#TAB##R# rate#TAB##R# to#TAB##R# use#TAB##R# for#TAB##R…”
Does a Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels Reduce Climate Costs?
Greaker, M., Hoel, M. O., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2014) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/678189 · Cited by 11
Dutch disease and spending strategies in a resource-rich low-income country -- the case of Niger
Go, D., Robinson, S., Thierfelder, K., & Utz, R. (2013) · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-6691 · Cited by 12
“𝑪⁄ Stern (2007) 1.4 0.1 1 1.3 Nordhaus (2007) 5.5 1.5 2 5.5 Weitzman (2007) 6.0 2.0 2 2.0 Arrow (2007) 2-6 0 2-3 1-2 Gollier (2006) 2.6-5.2 0 2-4 1-3 HM Treasury (2003) 3.5 1.5 1 2.0 Harrison (2010) 0.24-11 0 2-4 1.3 Dasgupta (2006) 2-8 0 2-4 1-2 Collier et al. (2010) Fast growing economy 10 If 1…”
InfluentialDetecting and responding to climate change
Hasselmann, K. (2013) · Tellus B · doi:10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20088 · Cited by 12
“We have not attempted to represent this through a discount factor, a long-standing subject of debate (see, e.g. Nordhaus, 1997; Hasselmann, 1999, and the more recent controversy, Tol and Yohe, 2006; Nordhaus, 2007, over the low discount factor used in the Stern (2007) review).”
BackgroundA Review of the Climate-Change-Impacts’ Rates of Change in the Arctic
Pechsiri, J. S., Sattari, A., Martínez, P. G., & Liu, X. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Protection · doi:10.4236/jep.2010.11008 · Cited by 12
“Although several studies have been made on the opportunities and adaptations required meeting climate change challenges [4,5], however, the question remains whether the rates of change caused by climate-change led impacts will be constant or accelerating.”
BackgroundHeterogeneous impatience in a continuous-time model
Hara, C. (2009) · doi:10.1007/s11579-009-0017-y · Cited by 12
“(8)Alternatively, as (19) and (20) indicate, the decline in the equity premium could be attributed to the decline in the volatility of the consumption growth rates, although the volatility is assumed to be constantly equal to σ in our model.”
BackgroundQuantifying catastrophic and climate impacted hazards based on local expert opinions.
Keighley, T., Longden, T., Mathew, S., & Trück, S. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.035 · Cited by 12
“While Government commissioned reports by Stern (2006) and Garnaut (2008) recommend the use of low social discount rates, their arguments have been criticised by various authors (Dasgupta, 2007; Weitzman, 2007; Nordhaus, 2008).”
BackgroundImpact of drought on Adelaide's water supply system: past, present, and future
Maier, H., Paton, F., Dandy, G., & Connor, J. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6636-5_3 · Cited by 12
Evolutionary Climate-Change Modelling: A Multi-Agent Climate-Economic Model
Geisendorf, S. (2018) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-017-9740-2 · Cited by 11
Basei, M., Ferrari, G., & Rodosthenous, N. (2023) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2024.104841 · Cited by 11
“Even though many experts did not agree with all the assumptions and conclusions made in the report (see [35], [50] and [51] for an overview), the Stern Review has contributed considerably to raise awareness of global warming.”
BackgroundCaputo, C., & Mašek, O. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14082189 · Cited by 19
“Based on the Stern review on the economics of climate change projects, a discount rate of I = 4% is applied in financial assessment [79].”
BackgroundDegrowth or Green Growth: A Reflection on the Recent Public Discourse in Norway
Capasso, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020698 · Cited by 11
“The emission of greenhouse gases damages constitutes a negative externality for society, which challenges standard economic theories because of its long-term horizon and intrinsic uncertainties [3,4].”
BackgroundCarbon taxes, poverty and compensation options
O'Malley, S., Roantree, B., & Curtis, J. (2020) · doi:10.26504/sustat98 · Cited by 11
“…carbon taxes can have distributional consequences that policymakers may be concerned about and want to ameliorate.3 This arises largely because certain groups – especially lowerincome households – spend a disproportionate share of their incomes on carbon- 1 See Nordhaus (2007) and Stern (2006).”
BackgroundDistributional issues in climate policy: air quality co-benefits and carbon rent
Boyce, J. K. (2020) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9780857939067.00007 · Cited by 6
What Value Do We Attach to Climate Action?
Quinet, A. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1995 · Cited by 10
“La publication du rapport Stern en 2006 a suscité de nombreux débats sur les grands paramètres du calcul coûts‑avantages (Weitzman, 2007 ; Nordhaus, 2007 ; Sterner & Petersson, 2008) Mais les modèles d’évaluation intégrée faisant foi au niveau international se comptent « sur les doigts d’une main »…”
BackgroundDiscursive diversity in introductory environmental studies
Kennedy, E. B., & Ho, J. S. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-015-0245-9 · Cited by 11
“…the Conservationists and the Preservationists, between Lord Nicholas Stern and William Nordhaus over the social cost of climate change (Stern 2006; Nordhaus 2007), and around the ethics of ecosystem service valuation were frequently represented, with at least half of the classes exploring one…”
BackgroundResolving intertemporal conflicts: Economics vs. Politics
Millner, A., & Heal, G. M. (2014) · doi:10.3386/w20705 · Cited by 11
“This has been highlighted by the long-standing debate about the appropriate rate of time preference for the evaluation of climate change policy (Nordhaus, 2008; Stern, 2007; Weitzman, 2007).”
Problems with Power-Transition Theory: Beyond the Vanishing Disparities Thesis
Harris, P. (2014) · doi:10.1080/14799855.2014.983634 · Cited by 11
Dietz, S., & Morton, A. (2011) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01484.x · Cited by 11
“unusually low discount rate to compare the future benefits of emissions reductions with their present costs (18, 68-71).”
Do People Care About Future Generations? Derived Preferences from Happiness Data
Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2018) · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.029 · Cited by 11
“Weitzman (2007) and Nordhaus (2006), among others, criticized Stern’s claim for being based on an extreme assumption about time preference, thus amplifying the benefits of deep emissions cuts of greenhouse gases.”
How to aggregate experts' discount rates: An equilibrium approach
Jouini, E., & Napp, C. (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.052 · Cited by 11
“As underlined by e.g. Nordhaus (2007) or Weitzman (2007), there is an important distinction between the social discount rate and the social discount rate.”
BackgroundIntergenerational egalitarianism
Piacquadio, P. (2014) · Journal of Economics Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2014.06.001 · Cited by 11
“21For a general discussion of ethical approaches to intergenerational justice see Page (2007) and Fleurbaey and Blanchet (2013).”
BackgroundDistributional biases in the analysis of climate change
Skott, P., & Davis, L. E. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.014 · Cited by 11
“( Weitzman 2007, p. 712) According to Weitzman, Nordhaus(cid:146)s "careful pragmatic modeling throughout his DICE series of IAMs has long set the standard in this area" (p. 713).”
Valuing environmental costs and benefits in an uncertain future: risk aversion and discounting
Medvecky, F. (2012) · Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · doi:10.23941/ejpe.v5i1.91 · Cited by 11
Towards a social cost of carbon with national characteristics
Dong, J.-C., Tol, R., & Wang, F. (2024) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111977 · Cited by 10
Climate urgency and the timing of carbon fluxes
van Kooten, G. C., Withey, P., & Johnston, C. M. T. (2021) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106162 · Cited by 16
Lewandowsky, S., Freeman, M., & MANN, M. E. (2017) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.03.007 · Cited by 45
“The striking difference between $6 and $1.6 billion reveals why “the biggest uncertainty of all in the economics of climate change is the uncertainty about which interest rate to use for discounting” (Weitzman, 2007, p. 705).”
BackgroundInfluentialOn the Strategic Effect of International Permits Trading on Local Pollution
Antoniou, F., & Kyriakopoulou, E. (2015) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-019-00369-0 · Cited by 10
ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND CLIMATE VARIABILITY: DO IT NOW OR WAIT AND SEE?
Narita, D., & Quaas, M. (2014) · doi:10.1142/s2010007814500134 · Cited by 10
A method for socially evaluating the effects of long-run demographic paths on living standards
Parr, N., & Guest, R. (2014) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2014.31.11 · Cited by 10
“Nordhaus (2007) argues that because both ρ and β discount future consumption the choice of values for these parameters should be considered jointly for any given value of A g .”
Economic Growth Assumptions in Climate and Energy Policy
Krakauer, N. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6031448 · Cited by 10
“While the exact value of this elasticity is arbitrary and empirical evidence on people’s preferences shows substantial variation [51], an elasticity of about two is generally regarded as reasonable [52] and is used in economic studies of such things as investment behavior [53,54] and spending on medical care [55].”
BackgroundThe Spanish Gas and Electricity Sector: Regulation, Markets and Environmental Policies
Federico, G. (2010) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2883869 · Cited by 10
“As noted by some economists (e.g. Nordhaus (2007) and Weitzman (2007)), this argument supports the conclusion in the Stern Review if one weighs future consumption almost the same as current consumption, by assuming a fairly low social discount rate.”
The Social Discount Rate Under Intertemporal Risk Aversion and Ambiguity
Traeger, C. (2008) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1898098 · Cited by 10
“The various contributions to the social discount rate have been considered and discussed extensively in the recent debate, among others, by Nordhaus (2007), Weitzman (2007), Weitzman (2009), and Dasgupta (2009).”
InfluentialInternational Advisory Proceedings on Climate Change
Mayer, B. (2023) · Michigan Journal of International Law · doi:10.36642/mjil.44.1.international · Cited by 10
Local consequences of climate change: State park visitations on the north Shore of Minnesota
Kanazawa, M. T., Wilson, B., & Holmberg, K. (2018) · Water Resources and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.wre.2018.01.003 · Cited by 11
International Cooperation: Agreements & Instruments
Minx, J. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415416.019 · Cited by 10
Rushing the Impatient: Allowance Reserves and the Time Profile of Low-Carbon Investments
Perino, G., & Willner, M. (2019) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-019-00350-x · Cited by 10
“Rather, we allow firms to put a lower weight on future payoffs than society (Nordhaus 2007; Stern 2008; Heinzel and Winkler 2011; Barrage 2018).”
BackgroundCarbon Dioxide as a Risky Asset
Bauer, A. M., Proistosescu, C., & Wagner, G. (2024) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-024-03724-3 · Cited by 9
Bertolami, O. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3924903 · Cited by 9
“%) and somewhat closer to average capital rates in the market (Nordhaus, 2007).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Weitzman, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weitzman, Martin L
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 703-724
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035757940
- Cited by
- 1,024
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 242.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Keywords
- Stern Review, climate change economics, greenhouse gas stabilization, discount rate, uncertainty, cost-benefit analysis, consumption smoothing, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review