The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
Abstract
The Stern Review calls for immediate decisive action to stabilize greenhouse gases because “the benefits of strong, early action on climate change outweighs the costs.” The economic analysis supporting this conclusion consists mostly of two basic strands. The first strand is a formal aggregative model that relies for its conclusions primarily upon imposing a very low discount rate. Concerning this discount-rate aspect, I am skeptical of the Review's formal analysis, but this essay points out that we are actually a lot less sure about what interest rate should be used for discounting climate change than is commonly acknowledged. The Review's second basic strand is a more intuitive argument that it might be very important to avoid possibly large uncertainties that are difficult to quantify. Concerning this uncertainty aspect, I argue that it might be recast into sound analytical reasoning that might justify some of the Review's conclusions. The basic issue here is that spending money to slow global warming should perhaps not be conceptualized primarily as being about consumption smoothing as much as being about how much insurance to buy to offset the small change of a ruinous catastrophe that is difficult to compensate by ordinary savings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This judgement of Weitzman's is an ethical one, because it is about how governments ought to behave towards future generations.”
From The most important thing about climate change (2010) · cites this paper as Weitzman (2007)
Citations
Cites
On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,791
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Dasgupta Partha, 2007, National Institute Economic Review, 199, 4, 10.1177/0027950107077111 · DOI
- Hope Chris, 2006, Integrated Assessment, 6, 19
- Kelly David L, 1999, H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: Elgar, 171
- Mendelsohn Robert O, 2007, Regulation, 29, 40
- 10.1257/jel.45.3.686 · DOI
- Tol Richard S. J., 2006, World Economics, 7, 233
- 10.1126/science.1131728 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Information Risk: Evidence from the Korean Market
Choi, D., Chung, C.-N.-Y., Kim, D., & Liu, C. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11226518 · Cited by 5
“Despite some skepticism about the benefits of CER [4], Margolis and Walsh [5] and Orlitzky et al.”
BackgroundCarbon taxes and compensation options
Bercholz, M., & Roantree, B. (2019) · doi:10.26504/bp202001 · Cited by 5
“3 In an Irish context, recognition of this dates back to at least Scott (1992) and O’Donoghue (1997).”
InfluentialOptimal Policies in the Dasgupta—Heal—Solow—Stiglitz Model under Nonconstant Returns to Scale
Aseev, S., Besov, K., & Kaniovski, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s0081543819010061 · Cited by 5
“For example, the influential review by Stern [48] and the reply by Nordhaus [40] used discount rates of 0.014 and 0.055, respectively.”
MethodInfluentialPrescriptivism, Risk Aversion, and Intertemporal Substitution in Climate Economics
Kelleher, J., & Wagner, G. (2018) · doi:10.15609/annaeconstat2009.132.0129 · Cited by 5
“It is easy to find staunch supporters of parameter descriptivism among (climate) economists (e.g., Nordhaus, 2007a,b; Weitzman, 2007a).”
InfluentialModified Ramsey Rule, Optimal Carbon Tax and Economic Growth
Kuninori, M., & Otaki, M. (2016) · doi:10.4236/acs.2016.62019 · Cited by 5
“(2)See also Nordhaus [7] and Weitzman [8].”
ResultInfluentialModified Ramsey Discounting for Climate Change
Tol, R. S. J. (2015) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2698609 · Cited by 5
“The discussion on the rate of pure time preference has been voluminous (Nordhaus 2007;Pearce et al. 2003;Stern 2008), but the rate of risk aversion attracted less attention in the context of climate change (Anthoff et al. 2009b;Anthoff et al. 2009c;Weitzman 2007).”
Guivarch, C., & Stéphane Hallegatte, A. (2012) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.006 · Cited by 55
Tian, H.-F., Shi, X.-J., & Whalley, J. (2012) · doi:10.3386/w18443 · Cited by 5
Climate Ethics: Structuring Deliberation by Means of Logical Argument Mapping
Hoffmann, M. (2011) · doi:10.1353/jsp.2011.0007 · Cited by 5
Public Investment as Commitment
Gerlagh, R., & Liski, M. (2011) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1756669 · Cited by 5
“To explore this, consider conditions (26)-(27) defining generation 2 policy functions g(I) and h(I) for capital k3 and public investment q, respectively.”
BackgroundInfluentialUncertainty, Climate Change and the Global Economy
von Below, D., & Persson, T. (2008) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14426 · Cited by 5
“6The specific assumptions about the discount rate have indeed been one of the major points in the public discussion about the conclusions in the Stern Review (Stern, 2006); see, e.g., Nordhaus (2006), Dasgupta (2007) and Weitzman (2007).”
The Picture from Cost-Benefit Analysis
Thomas, V., & Chindarkar, N. (2019) · Economic Evaluation of Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6389-4_3 · Cited by 5
Creating an Innovative Mobility Ecosystem for Urban Planning Areas
Karim, D. M. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8_2 · Cited by 5
“5%) [25] to achieve “Our Common Future” [26].”
Climate Change, Society, and Agriculture: an Economic and Policy Perspective
Chen, J., Huang, P., McCarl, B., & Shiva, L. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52512-3.00001-2 · Cited by 5
The value of information in a risk management approach to climate change
Kousky, C., & Cooke, R. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4839-2_2 · Cited by 5
The actor-driven dynamics of decarbonization
Hasselmann, K., & Voinov, A. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203154724-13 · Cited by 5
Kennet, M., Baster, N., Gale, M., & Tickell, O. (2009) · doi:10.1504/ijge.2009.031320 · Cited by 5
“If we move to say 5 degrees climate change, we are creating a scenario as different as the last ice age and to choose and plan to do this voluntarily, in the service of a mainstream economy, (Weitzman, 2007; Heal, 2007; Dasgupta, 2006) is clearly complete folly.”
BackgroundInfluentialWharton, G. A., & McGuire, A. (2026) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105583 · Cited by 4
Koundouri, P., Papayiannis, G., Petracou, E., & Yannacopoulos, A. (2023) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-024-00846-1 · Cited by 4
“…is of crucial importance in any valuation study or for policy making (see e.g. Stern and Stern (2007); Nordhaus (2007), Gollier (2002); Weitzman (2007); Dasgupta (2008); Heal (2009); Groom et al. (2005); Hepburn and Koundouri (2007); Groom et al. (2007); Gollier et al. (2008); Hepburn…”
Valuing the Future and Discounting in Random Environments: A Review
Masoliver, J., Montero, M., Perelló, J., Farmer, J., & Geanakoplos, J. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24040496 · Cited by 4
Estimates of the social cost of carbon have increased over timePreprint
Tol, R. S. J. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.03656 · Cited by 3
Discounting and the Green Transition: District Heating in Denmark
Freeman, M., Nesje, F., Sneum, D. M., & Soysal, E. R. (2021) · Danish utility regulator's anthology project series on better regulation in the energy sector · doi:10.51138/bzyb4621 · Cited by 4
“, (2008), “The economics of climate change”, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 98(2), 1–37; and Nordhaus, W.D. (2007), “A review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change”, Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 686–702.”
BackgroundSoltani, A., Rannestad, M., & Hofstad, O. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.127 · Cited by 4
KEYNOTE: Global Extinction and Animal Welfare: Two Priorities for Effective Altruism
Ng, Y.-K. (2019) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12647 · Cited by 4
“Weitzman (2007) correctly mentions that in dealing with global warming, the expected growth rate should have ‘a thick left tail’ (p.718); but acknowledges that ‘we lack a usable economic framework for dealing with these kinds of thick-tailed extreme disasters’ (p.723).”
The state of applied environmental macroeconomics
Rivera, G. L., Malliet, P., Saussay, A., & Reynès, F. (2019) · Revue De L'ofce · doi:10.3917/reof.157.0133 · Cited by 4
Global Demographic Change and Climate Policies
Gerlagh, R., Jaimes, R., & Motavasseli, A. (2017) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3040546 · Cited by 4
“Higher values for this parameter can be found in Weitzman (2007) and Nordhaus (1993) (first column entries of : the effective discount factor.”
Everuss, L., Carvalho, M., Casanova, J., Chaffee, D., & Lever‐Tracy, C. (2017) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783316684661 · Cited by 8
“Like the cost of climate change mitigation, the distant time frame in which its effects are expected has been seen as a barrier to action (Nordhaus, 2007: 690–1; Pidgeon and Fischhoff, 2011: 37).”
BackgroundInfluentialPareto Improving Climate Policies: Distributing the Benefits Across Generations and Regions
Hoel, M., Kittelsen, S. A. C., & Kverndokk, S. (2015) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2663898 · Cited by 4
“A potential loss for current generations could therefore be substantially reduced and may even disappear, if an efficient BAU path is used. controversial for many years, see for instance, the Stern Review (Stern, 2007), and the subsequent discussion in e.g., Nordhaus (2007) and Weitzman (2007).”
BackgroundMethodJaffe, A., & Kerr, S. (2015) · doi:10.1257/jel.53.1.79 · Cited by 4
Guldi, J., & Armitage, D. (2015) · doi:10.1080/13642529.2015.1005377 · Cited by 4
Welfare Effects of Subsidizing a Dead-End Network of Less Polluting Vehicles
Dietrich, A., & Sieg, G. (2014) · Networks and Spatial Economics · doi:10.1007/s11067-014-9229-7 · Cited by 4
Hyytiäinen, K., Ahlvik, L., Ahtiainen, H., Artell, J., Dahlbo, K., & Huhtala, A. (2013) · AgEcon search · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.160728 · Cited by 4
“7 The choice of interest rate is often decisive when evaluating long-term environmental investments, with a lower rate tending to favour measures with long lags (Nordhaus 2007).”
Tokimatsu, K., Ii, R., Yamaguchi, R., Sato, M., Yasuoka, R., Nishio, M., & Ueta, K. (2013) · doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.791346 · Cited by 4
Optimal Pollution Abatement Under ‘Sustainable’ and Other Social Time Preferences
Guest, R. (2013) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9704-5 · Cited by 4
Global Climate Change Justice: Toward a Risk-Adjusted Social Floor
Siegel, P., & Jorgensen, S. (2013) · doi:10.1111/j.2040-0209.2013.00426.x · Cited by 4
Eskeland, G. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2295963 · Cited by 4
“Weitzman (2007) argues an insurance perspective rather than the usual one in savings and investment models to render mitigation benefits sufficient weight.”
"Should we sustain? And if so, sustain what? Consumption or the quality of life? " *
Llavador, H., Roemer, J., & Silvestre, J. (2013) · doi:10.4337/9780857933690.00042 · Cited by 4
MacLeod, S., Roshani, E., & Filion, Y. (2011) · doi:10.1061/41203(425)92 · Cited by 4
Effects of international sharing of pollution abatement burdens on income inequality among countries
Hirazawa, M., Saito, K., & Yakita, A. (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2011.01.015 · Cited by 4
Normative Dimensions of Sustainable Energy Policy
Carley, S. (2011) · doi:10.1080/21550085.2011.578382 · Cited by 4
“Weitzman (2007) estimates that the difference in costs of global warming between Stern’s and other models is two orders of magnitude.”
Global Demographic Change, Carbon Emissions, the Optimal Carbon Price and Carbon Abatement
Guest, R. (2010) · doi:10.2202/1524-5861.1466 · Cited by 4
“…than using resources to reduce emissions, but over time the rising cost of emissions shifts this balance towards emissions reductions, implying a rising carbon price (Nordhaus, 2007a opposite pattern to the Medium scenario – a lower support ratio initially and a higher support ratio subsequently.”
Anti-Sustainability Rhetoric: Sketching Ideological Responses
Sawyer, J. E. (2009) · doi:10.3917/jie.003.0049 · Cited by 4
“M. Weitzman (2008b, 2007a), an environmental economist and Harvard colleague of Barro, points out the possibility of bias toward private investment, in contrast with public investment, because the very reliance upon discounting to present value dictates profitability over a limited time span.”
BackgroundA Precauctionary Strategy to Avoid Dangerous Climate Change is Affordable: 12 Reasons
van den Bergh, J. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38919-6_12 · Cited by 4
Modelling the social cost of carbon for Malaysia
Rao, T., Mustapa, S. I., Al-Amin, A., & Ahmed, A. (2025) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-024-00182-5 · Cited by 3
“Another inherent factor is the evolution of IAMs over time in terms of improved cost of climate damage function, global climate cycles, and climate change mitigation technology pricing (Rao and Mustapa 2021; Weitzman 2007; Wong et al. 2015).”
Do you believe in Deep Down? On two conceptions of valuing
Jahn, M., & Beck, L. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04221-3 · Cited by 3
“Just think of integrated assessment models in the context of climate change and their reliance on GDP (see Weitzman, 2007; Nordhaus, 2018).”
BackgroundNordhaus on philosophy in climate change economics
Jodoin, L. (2020) · Journal of Philosophical Economics · doi:10.46298/jpe.10736 · Cited by 3
“My main aim in this article is to assess those arguments, especially those found in his 2007 paper ‘A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change’ (Nordhaus, 2007), and to show that they exemplify, to a large extent, what not to do when dealing with philosophical questions in economics, and with the…”
BackgroundInfluentialRozell, D. J. (2020) · Ubiquity Press eBooks · doi:10.5334/bci.c · Cited by 2
“For example, the choice of discount rate is often the most fundamental source of disagreement in long-term climate change economic risk assessments (Stern 2006; Nordhaus 2007; Stern & Taylor 2007).”
Skourtos, M., Damigos, D., Kontogianni, A., Tourkolias, C., & Hunt, A. (2019) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies7040107 · Cited by 3
Reflections on the 2018 Nobel Memorial Prize Awarded to William Nordhaus
Kelleher, J. (2019) · Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · doi:10.23941/ejpe.v12i1.415 · Cited by 3
“…to climate economics in his review of the Stern Review, “When countries weigh their self-interest in international bargains about emissions reductions and burden sharing, they will look at the actual gains from bargains, and the returns on these relative to other investments” (Nordhaus 2007, 692).”
BackgroundMalik, A. (2019) · Green Finance · doi:10.3934/gf.2019.3.249 · Cited by 3
Balcombe, K., Fraser, I., & Sharma, A. (2019) · Management of environmental quality · doi:10.1108/meq-12-2018-0214 · Cited by 3
Real Option Valuation in a Gollier/Weitzman World: The Effect of Long-Run Discount Rate Uncertainty
M, D. T., Power, G. J., & Bastien, J. (2018) · Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.39.5.dtan · Cited by 3
“Although we cannot hope to summarize this large and multi-disciplinary literature, it is useful to consider a few points made by Nordhaus (2007) and by Weitzman (2007) in their separate reviews of the Stern Review (2007).”
BackgroundFukaya, Y., Goto, M., Ohashi, H., Nishihara, T., Tsubata, Y., & Matsumura, T. (2018) · Annals of Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2018.02.031 · Cited by 3
Craxton, M., Merrick, J., Makridis, C., & Taggart, J. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.003 · Cited by 3
“For those who have interest in the referenced discount rate debate we point the readers to Stern (2007), Weitzman (2007), and Nordhaus (2007), to start.”
The intrinsic role of the banks in decarbonizing the economy
Odeku, K. O. (2017) · Banks and Bank Systems · doi:10.21511/bbs.12(4).2017.04 · Cited by 5
“It is pertinent to point out that there is a link between investment and climate change (Mayo, 2007).”
Endogenous Factor Analysis: The Carbon Performance of Public Projects in China
Tang, Z., Li, L., Zhu, S.-S., & Huang, Z.-Y. (2017) · doi:10.1177/875697281704800503 · Cited by 3
“…Busch, 2010; Doda, Gennaoli, Gouldson, Grover, & Sullivan, 2016), carbon footprint (Delmas & Nairnbrich, 2011; Goldhammer, Busse, & Busch, 2016), carbon supply chain management (Nishitani, Kokubu, & Kajiwara, 2016; Elhedhli & Merrick, 2012), and carbon emission with climate change (Nordhaus, 2007).”
BackgroundGreen Technology Adoption and the Business Cycle
Bourgeon, J.-M., & Hovsepian, M. (2017) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2952910 · Cited by 3
“Nordhaus (2007), finds a SCC of 11,5 $/tCO2 for 2015 while more recently, with similar calibration for the rate of pure time preference, Traeger (2015) and Golosov et al.”
Bewertung von Ökosystemleistungen: eine Bestandsaufnahme
Olschewski, R. (2017) · Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen · doi:10.3188/szf.2017.0003 · Cited by 5
Noncooperative Resource Exploitation by Patient Players
Mitra, T., & Sorger, G. (2015) · Dynamic Games and Applications · doi:10.1007/s13235-015-0135-5 · Cited by 3
“As for the transversality condition (9), we note that equation (11) holds along the path generated by the proposed equilibrium, which implies that”
Catastrophic Risk, Precautionary Abatement, and Adaptation TransfersPreprint
Bosello, F., Cian, E. D., & Ferranna, L. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2550714 · Cited by 3
“…impacts Energy Tourism SLR River Floods Agriculture Forestry Health Used this study Nordhaus (2007) Used this study Nordhaus (2007) Used this study Nordhaus (2007) Used this study Nordhaus (2007) Used this study Nordhaus (2007) Used this study Nordhaus (2007) Used this study Nordhaus…”
MethodResultInfluentialDrought Risk in Cambodia: Assessing Costs and a Potential Solution
Chhinh, N., Cheb, H., & Heng, N. (2014) · Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development · doi:10.37801/ajad2014.11.2.1 · Cited by 3
The social valuation of income: a survey approach
Evans, D., Kula, E., & Nagase, Y. (2014) · doi:10.1108/jes-01-2013-0011 · Cited by 3
Ramsey Rule with Progressive Utility in Long Term Yield Curves Modeling
Karoui, N. E., Hillairet, C., & Mrad, M. (2014) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1404.1895 · Cited by 3
“It has been further discussed by numerous economists such as Gollier [Gol10, Gol12] and Weitzman [Wei98, Wei07].”
InfluentialSustainability and the measurement of future paths in genuine savings: case studies
Tokimatsu, K., Yasuoka, R., Nishio, M., & Ueta, K. (2013) · doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.850753 · Cited by 3
“The utility discount rate was taken to be 2% per year, a relatively smaller value than the mean value of 2.5% generally found among existing studies (e.g. Portney & Weyant 1999; Stern 2006; Dasgupta 2007; Nordhaus 2007).”
ResultInfluentialHydrometeorological hazards under future climate change
Edwards, T. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139047562.007 · Cited by 6
Risk and uncertainty in hydrometeorological hazards
Edwards, T., & Challenor, P. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139047562.006 · Cited by 3
“The assumptions and methodology of the Stern Review have been criticised (e.g. Weitzman, 2007): in particular, the use of a low discount rate (reduction in future costs of taking action).”
MethodVarenio, C. (2012) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/d1944de1z5fc5z4927zb810zab1fe39203f9 · Cited by 1
Agliardi, E., & Sereno, L. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2180832 · Cited by 3
“It is well known that in the debate about environmental policy intervention either an immediate government action is prescribed (Stern, 2007) or a more gradualist approach is suggested (Nordhaus, 2007) to contrast and control emissions and climate change.”
BackgroundCourard‐Hauri, D., & Lauer, S. A. (2012) · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis · doi:10.1515/2152-2812.1099 · Cited by 4
“…widely used to explain behaviors such as risk aversion (Nicholson, 1995), plays a fundamental role in the intergenerational discount rate (Ramsey, 1928; Nordhaus, 2007), and is the basis for an array of social welfare functions (e.g., Sen, 1973; Blackorby and Donaldson, 1978; Bossert et al., 2009).”
BackgroundIntertemporal Evaluation Criteria for Climate Change Policy: The Basic Ethical Issues
Buchholz, W., & Schymura, M. (2011) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1833395 · Cited by 3
Ecosystem services between sustainability and efficiency
Olschewski, R., & Klein, A. (2011) · doi:10.1080/15487733.2011.11908066 · Cited by 3
“The review has been criticized for its economic assumptions and in particular for the low discount rates applied, which substantially increase the weight assigned to costs of climate change occurring in the future (e.g., Tol & Yohe, 2006; Nordhaus, 2007).”
BackgroundEconomic catch‐up and emission reductions
Lane, J. (2010) · doi:10.1108/20408021011059278 · Cited by 3
Economic analysis and climate change policy
Cline, W. (2010) · doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9766-0 · Cited by 3
The Challenges of Climate for Energy Markets
Brennan, T. (2009) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1471325 · Cited by 3
Economic Policy when Models Disagree
Barrieu, P., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2009) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1366989 · Cited by 3
Economics, ethics and climate changePreprint
Dietz, S., Hepburn, C., & Stern, N. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1090572 · Cited by 3
Button, K. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28661-3_3 · Cited by 3
Economics for a sustainable planet
Malik, A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14409-2_7 · Cited by 3
On Intergenerational Distribution of the Burden of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Lugovoy, O., & Polbin, A. (2016) · Journal of the New Economic Association · doi:10.31737/2221-2264-2016-31-3-1 · Cited by 3
Dahlgren, E. (2013) · doi:10.7916/d8m04cs0 · Cited by 3
“The proposition of valuating the effects of climate change by using very low or even negative discount rates, as suggested in the ‘Stern Report’, met firm opposition among economists (Stern et al., 2007; Nordhaus, 2007).”
BackgroundAssessing the implications of a carbon market for boreal forest management
Elgie, S., Mccarney, G. R., & Adamowicz, W. (2011) · doi:10.5558/tfc2011-027 · Cited by 3
Nagashima, M. (2010) · doi:10.18174/133509 · Cited by 3
“Nordhaus (2007) argues that discount rate should be consistent with the observed rate of return on capital, and Mendelsohn (2008) argues that low discount rates are equitable because that makes each generation equally worse off, as each generation is burdened by the following generations.”
BackgroundThe Macroeconomics of Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Chan, Y.-T., Ji, Q., & Zhang, D.-Y. (2025) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.103997 · Cited by 2
Markets and Public Goods: Integrity, Trust, and Climate Change
Offer, A. (2024) · Society · doi:10.1007/s12115-024-01007-2 · Cited by 2
“The third discount rate, proposed by Martin Weitzman, is an average of the two (Weitzman 2007).”
Towards a representative social cost of carbon
Dong, J.-C., Tol, R., & Wang, F. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.04989 · Cited by 2
Bossy, T., Gasser, T., Lecocq, F., Bednar, J., Tanaka, K., & Ciais, P. (2024) · Environmental Research: Climate · doi:10.1088/2752-5295/ad34a8 · Cited by 2
“We identify least-cost pathways in this large ensemble that are common to different mitigation cost function [5, 13] and that do not rely on the choices of objective functions to minimize [14, 15].”
BackgroundMethodFarmer, J., Geanakoplos, J., Richiardi, M. G., Montero, M., Perelló, J., & Masoliver, J. (2023) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12050645 · Cited by 2
“The choice of discount rate is part of current economic debates on the urgency of the response to global warming (see [2–10]).”
A szén-dioxid-kibocsátások árazása : Az elméleti alapoktól a vállalati gyakorlatig
Nemes, Z., & Széchy, A. (2023) · Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review · doi:10.14267/veztud.2023.02.04 · Cited by 2
On Current and Future Carbon Prices in a Risky World
Olijslagers, S., van der Ploeg, F., & van Wijnbergen, S. V. (2022) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104569 · Cited by 2
Economic activity and climate change
de Juan, A., Poncela, P., Rodríguez-Caballero, V., & Ruiz, E. (2022) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.03187 · Cited by 2
Pretel, C., & Linares, P. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14227781 · Cited by 2
The Entrepreneurial Social Discount Rate: Risk Premium and Loss Aversion in New Ventures
Hornero, D. C., & Mongrut, S. A. (2021) · Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas · doi:10.21919/remef.v16i4.610 · Cited by 3
“They have used it to pull future benefits and costs of climate change back to the present (Nordhaus, 2007) or to evaluate health-care programs (Drummond et al, 2005).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Changes in Regulation and Technology on Capital Investments
Okere, V., & Chen, W. (2021) · Journal of Mathematical Finance · doi:10.4236/jmf.2021.112019 · Cited by 2
“In The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, Weitzman (2007) [35] reported that though the Stern Review called for “immediate decisive action to stabilize greenhouse gases because the benefits of strong early action on climate change outweighs the costs” by adopting a very low discount rate for investments…”
BackgroundDiscounting Environmental Benefits for Future Generations
Liu, L.-Q., Rettenmaier, A., & Saving, T. (2020) · doi:10.1177/1091142120959675 · Cited by 2
“The SRTP formula can also be extended by considering uncertainty in the consumption growth rate (Gollier 2002; Howarth 2003; Cochrane 2005; Weitzman 2007; Ackerman et al. 2009; Liu 2012).”
BackgroundClimate change, catastrophes and Dismal Theorem: a critical review
Rampa, A. (2020) · Review of Regional Research · doi:10.1007/s10037-020-00140-9 · Cited by 2
“Thus, according to the parametrisation set by Weitzman (2007) on the integrated assessment model (IAM) and in line with the policy view adopted in the Stern Review, a saving rate climate-friendly saving rate has to be s 100%.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialJaakkola, N., & Millner, A. (2020) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/719237 · Cited by 2
“Disagreements about social time preferences are at the heart of the extensive debate about optimal climate policy that followed the publication of the Stern review on the economics of climate change (Nordhaus 2007;Weitzman 2007; Dasgupta 2008; Stern 2008).”
Bechtel, M. M., Scheve, K. F., & van Lieshout, E. (2019) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3472314 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Weitzman, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weitzman, Martin L
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 703-724
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035757940
- Cited by
- 1,024
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 242.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Keywords
- Stern Review, climate change economics, greenhouse gas stabilization, discount rate, uncertainty, cost-benefit analysis, consumption smoothing, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review