The DOI matches its Crossref record; 183 of the 183 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we document basic facts regarding public debates about controversial political issues on Chinese social media. Our documentation is based on a dataset of 13.2 billion blog posts published on Sina Weibo—the most prominent Chinese microblogging platform—during the 2009–2013 period. Our primary finding is that a shockingly large number of posts on highly sensitive topics were published and circulated on social media. For instance, we find millions of posts discussing protests, and these posts are informative in predicting the occurrence of specific events. We find an even larger number of posts with explicit corruption allegations, and that these posts predict future corruption charges of specific individuals. Our findings challenge a popular view that an authoritarian regime would relentlessly censor or even ban social media. Instead, the interaction of an authoritarian government with social media seems more complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This approach overcomes the potential problem in fixed-effects models with (misspecified) temporal lag structures arising from the assumption that the independent variables are serially uncorrelated.”
From Authoritarian collaboration and repression in the digital age: balancing foreign direct investment and control in internet infrastructure (2026) · cites this paper as [87]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods
Platt, J. C. (1999) · Cited by 4,834
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000014 · Cited by 2,415 · cited 2×
“[20] King, Gary, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E Roberts.”
InfluentialThe net delusion: the dark side of Internet freedom
Murphy, D. M. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-7161 · Cited by 1,907
Making Large-Scale Support Vector Machine Learning Practical
Joachims, T. (1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1130.003.0015 · Cited by 1,639
Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization
Dumais, S., Platt, J. C., Heckerman, D. E., & Sahami, M. (1998) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/288627.288651 · Cited by 1,481
The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change
Shirky, C. (2011) · Foreign Affairs · Cited by 1,193
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000144 · Cited by 1,028
Realizing the potential of digital development: The case of agricultural advice
Fabregas, R., Kremer, M. R., & Schilbach, F. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay3038 · Cited by 626
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- economist.com/news/special-report/21574628- internet-was-expected-help-democratise-china- instead-it-has-enabled. Freedom House. 2012. "Freedom on the Net: China." https://freedomhouse.org/report/ freedom-net/2012/china. Freedom House. 2015. "2015 Freedom of the Press Data." https://freedomhouse.org/ report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015#.
- Chandan Kumar Jha, Bibhudutta Panda, Santosh Kumar Sahu. 2022. Institutions and Conflict. SSRN Electronic Journal 76. . [Crossref] · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239 · Cited by 560
Guriev, S., & Treisman, D. (2019) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.33.4.100 · Cited by 560
Realizing the potential of digital development: The case of agricultural advice
Fabregas, R., Kremer, M. R., & Schilbach, F. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay3038 · Cited by 626
Social Media and Protest Participation: Evidence From Russia
Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2020) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta14281 · Cited by 489
To Repress or to Co‐opt? Authoritarian Control in the Age of Digital Surveillance
Xu, X. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12514 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2017-02-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-140
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2581925873
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 179
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 55.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Keywords
- social media regulation, authoritarianism, censorship, Weibo, microblogging, protest, political surveillance, propaganda, corruption allegations, online political discussion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
