The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements
Open accessAbstract
Structural new trade theory models have never been used to evaluate and quantify the role of preferential trade agreement (PTA) membership for trade in a way which is consistent with general equilibrium. Apart from filling this gap, the present paper aims at delivering an empirical model which takes into account both that PTA membership is endogenous and that the world matrix of bilateral trade flows contains numerous zero entries. These features are treated in an encompassing way by means of (possibly two-part) Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation with endogenous binary indicator variables in the empirical model. (JEL F11, F13, F15)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811241 · Cited by 8,092
Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle
Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803321455214 · Cited by 7,566
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OPTIMUM PRODUCT DIVERSITY
Dixit, A., Stiglitz, J. E., Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1975) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.268957 · Cited by 7,391
(2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.6.i · Cited by 7,220
Silva, J. M. C. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641 · Cited by 6,408
Technology, Geography, and Trade
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · Cited by 4,485
Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade
(1990) · Rethinking International Trade · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5933.003.0005 · Cited by 4,464
(1979) · American Economic Review · Cited by 3,564
Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects
Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x · Cited by 2,908
Cited by
Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook
Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2014) · Handbook of International Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3 · Cited by 1,565
Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation
Bergstrand, J. H., Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V. (2015) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.003 · Cited by 391
Self-citationEstimating the effects of non‐discriminatory trade policies within structural gravity models
Heid, B., Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique · doi:10.1111/caje.12493 · Cited by 227
Self-citationBias and consistency in three-way gravity models
Weidner, M., & Zylkin, T. (2021) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103513 · Cited by 201
Heterogeneous effects of economic integration agreements
Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., & Clance, M. W. (2018) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.014 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Egger, P., Larch, M., Staub, K. E., & Winkelmann, R.
- Venue
- American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2011-08-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 113-143
- ISSN
- 1945-7731
- 1945-774X
- OpenAlex
- W3125786087
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/pol.3.3.113
- The paper
- Egger, P., Larch, M., Staub, K. E., & Winkelmann, R. (2011). The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.3.3.113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
