Cited by 100CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseVirus-based gene therapy research

Tissue-restricted genome editing in vivo specified by microRNA-repressible anti-CRISPR proteins

Open access
Lee, Jooyoung, Mou, Haiwei, Ibraheim, Raed, Liang, Shun-Qing, Liu, Pengpeng, Xue, Wen, Sontheimer, Erik J.·2019·RNA

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas systems are bacterial adaptive immune pathways that have revolutionized biotechnology and biomedical applications. Despite the potential for human therapeutic development, there are many hurdles that must be overcome before its use in clinical settings. Some clinical safety concerns arise from editing activity in unintended cell types or tissues upon in vivo delivery (e.g., by adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors). Although tissue-specific promoters and serotypes with tissue tropisms can be used, suitably compact promoters are not always available for desired cell types, and AAV tissue tropism specificities are not absolute. To reinforce tissue-specific editing, we exploited anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) that have evolved as natural countermeasures against CRISPR immunity. To inhibit Cas9 in all ancillary tissues without compromising editing in the target tissue, we established a flexible platform in which an Acr transgene is repressed by endogenous, tissue-specific microRNAs (miRNAs). We demonstrate that miRNAs regulate the expression of an Acr transgene bearing miRNA-binding sites in its 3′-UTR and control subsequent genome editing outcomes in a cell-type specific manner. We also show that the strategy is applicable to multiple Cas9 orthologs and their respective anti-CRISPRs. Furthermore, we validate this approach in vivo by demonstrating that AAV9 delivery of Nme2Cas9, along with an AcrIIC3 Nme construct that is targeted for repression by liver-specific miR-122, allows editing in the liver while repressing editing in an unintended tissue (heart muscle) in adult mice. This strategy provides safeguards against off-tissue genome editing by confining Cas9 activity to selected cell types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1261/rna.071704.119

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The risk of off-target gene editing of bystander cells can be mitigated by the addition of tissue- or cell-specific miR binding sites to the mRNA sequence, which results in tissue-specific suppression of mRNA translation.

    “This risk can be mitigated by the addition of tissue- or cell-specific miR binding sites to the mRNA sequence, which results in tissue-specific suppression of mRNA translation (47, 48).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J., Mou, H., Ibraheim, R., Liang, S.-Q., Liu, P., Xue, W., & Sontheimer, E. J.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Venue
RNA
Published
2019-08-22
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1421-1431
ISSN
  • 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9001
OpenAlex
W2969305945
Cited by
100
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RNA (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (GM125797, DP2HL137167, UG3HL147367)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
anti-CRISPR proteins, microRNA repression, CRISPR/Cas9, miR-122, gene therapy safety
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Dependovirus, Animals, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transgenes, MicroRNAs, Mice, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review