Cited by 61Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Cyberchondria and its measurement. The Polish adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale CSS-PL

Open access
Bajcar, Beata, Babiak, Jolanta, Olchowska-Kotala, Agnieszka·2019·Psychiatria Polska

Abstract

Cel pracy: Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie procesu adaptacji testu do pomiaru cyberchondrii (Cyberchondria Severity Scale, CSS) do warunków polskich, jak i weryfikacja wybranych miar rzetelności narzędzia i trafności teoretycznej testu. Metoda: Uczestnikami badania było 380 osób (203 kobiet i 177 mężczyzn) w wieku od 19 do 68 lat, (M = 26,5; SD = 11,1). Do badania wykorzystano CSS-PL do pomiaru cyberchondrii, Kwestionariusz Lęku o Zdrowie (SHAI) do pomiaru hipochondrii i Skalę Wymiarów Obsesyjno-Kompulsywnych (DOCS) do weryfikacji natężenia skłonności obsesyjno-kompulsywnych. Wyniki: Badanie potwierdziło czteroczynnikową strukturę cyberchondrii mierzonej skalą CSS-PL. Wskaźniki spójności wewnętrznej podskal CSS-PL uzyskały poziom: 0,87–0,95; a stabilności bezwzględnej: 0,58–0,76. Badanie wykazało trafność teoretyczną skali CSS-PL w kontekście związków cyberchondrii z lękiem o zdrowie (r = 0,31–0,56) i objawami obsesyjno-kompulsywnymi (r = 0,17–0,48). Wnioski: Skala CSS-PL jest wstępną wystandaryzowaną wersją narzędzia do pomiaru cyberchondrii i spełnia kryteria psychometryczne w zakresie rzetelności i trafności testów psychologicznych. CSS-PL może być użytecznym narzędziem wykorzystywanym zarówno w badaniach diagnostycznych, jak i badaniach naukowych.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12740/pp/81799

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subjects with elevated health anxiety experience greater anxiety during and after online health searches and report more frequent and longer searches, compared to those with lower or normal levels of health anxiety.

    “Several studies have found that subjects with elevated health anxiety experience greater anxiety during and after online health searches and report more frequent and longer searches, compared to those with lower or normal levels of health anxiety [10,29,43,45,53,59].”
  • All CSS subscales showed moderate to strong intercorrelations, except for the mistrust factor, where only small or nonexistent associations were observed.

    “As detailed in Multimedia Appendix 4 [16-19,26,40,41] all CSS subscales showed moderate to strong intercorrelations, except for the mistrust factor, where only small or nonexistent associations were observed.”
  • Other versions of the CSS regarding language (German and Polish) and length (short versions in English and German) show psychometric qualities comparable with the original version.

    “Other versions of the CSS regarding language (German [39] and Polish [40]) and length (short versions in English [50] and German [39]) show psychometric qualities comparable with the original version.”
  • The DOCS total scale is significantly correlated to the CSS total scales with and without mistrust and to all CSS subscales.

    “It was shown that the DOCS total scale is significantly correlated to the CSS total scales with (r=0.49, P<.01 [16]; r=0.38, P<.01 [40]) and without mistrust (r=0.49, P<.01 [16]; r=0.56, P<.001 [22]; r=0.38, P<.0 [40]) and to all CSS subscales”
  • All CSS and DOCS subscales showed significant and mostly moderate intercorrelations.

    “Moreover, as detailed in Multimedia Appendix 8 [18,19,40], all CSS and DOCS subscales showed significant and mostly moderate intercorrelations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bajcar, B., Babiak, J., & Olchowska-Kotala, A.
Affiliations
  • Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL)
  • Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
Corresponding author
Bajcar, Beata
Venue
Psychiatria Polska
Published
2019-02-28
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
49-60
ISSN
  • 0033-2674 (ISSN-L)
  • 2391-5854
OpenAlex
W2922150744
Cited by
61
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
pl
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatria Polska (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
cyberchondria, Cyberchondria Severity Scale, Polish adaptation, psychometric properties, health anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, factor structure, reliability statistics, construct validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Poland, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review