Cited by 109Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Self-esteem and cyberchondria: The mediation effects of health anxiety and obsessive–compulsive symptoms in a community sample

Open access
Bajcar, Beata, Babiak, Jolanta·2021·Current Psychology

Abstract

Cyberchondria refers to the excessive and repeated searching for medical information on the Internet and may be considered as health-related problematic Internet use. Previous findings indicated that cyberchondria is positively associated with health anxiety and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. Also, research suggests that excessive or problematic Internet use as well as health worries and compulsive behaviors are present among individuals with low self-esteem. This study sought to examine: (1) the association between self-esteem and cyberchondria, and (2) the mediating role of health anxiety and obsessive–compulsive symptoms in the relationship between self-esteem and cyberchondria. Participants ( N = 207) from a community sample completed self-report measures assessing global self-esteem, health anxiety, obsessive–compulsive symptoms, and cyberchondria. We found that self-esteem directly predicted cyberchondria and that health anxiety and obsessive–compulsive symptoms parallelly mediated the relationship between self-esteem and cyberchondria. These findings suggest that low self-esteem, health anxiety and obsessive–compulsive symptoms can be considered vulnerability factors for cyberchondria. In addition, the reverse mediation model indicated that cyberchondria potentially predicts self-esteem both directly and through health anxiety and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. The bidirectional relationship among the analyzed variables are discussed in the context of potential psychological predictors and consequences of cyberchondria and possible mechanisms explaining cyberchondria. The current study provides further insight into the conceptualization of cyberchondria and the feasibility of specific treatment directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-019-00216-x

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In another recent investigation of 205 employees in Indian information technology companies, a cluster analysis classified 55.6% of the sample as cyberchondria, which the authors referred to as cyberchondria prevalence.

    “This cluster accounted for 55.6% of the total sample and was referred by the authors as CYB prevalence.”

    From Is cyberchondria a new transdiagnostic digital compulsive syndrome? A systematic review of the evidence (2020) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Participants and Procedure section describes a community sample of 207 Polish adults, not 205 employees of Indian IT companies. The Analytical Approach section describes correlations and regression, not a cluster analysis; our copy does not report a 55.6% cyberchondria-prevalence cluster. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Weinstein, A., & Aboujaoude, E. (2015). A review of problematic inter- net use. In E. Aboujaoude & V. Starcevic (Eds.), Mental health in the digital age grave dangers, great promise (pp. 3-26). London: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bajcar, B., & Babiak, J.
Affiliations
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Bajcar, Beata
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
2820-2831
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W2922279205
Cited by
109
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9
FWCI
14.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberchondria, self-esteem, health anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, problematic internet use, mediation, bidirectional relationship, vulnerability factors, health information seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review