Cited by 7Family Dynamics and RelationshipsReproductive Health and ContraceptionGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Fertility Postponement and Regional Patterns of Dispersion in Age at First Birth: Descriptive Findings and Interpretations

Open access
Nathan, Mathías, Pardo, Ignacio·2019·Federal Institute for Population Research

Abstract

Previous studies have documented an increasing heterogeneity in first-birth timing in countries experiencing the postponement transition. Sobotka (2004), for instance, showed a rising dispersion in age at first birth in developed countries, particularly in the United Kingdom and the United States, where the timing polarisation between more and less advantaged women is most evident. However, these studies have included few countries outside Europe and North America, and lack a thorough interpretation of the rising dispersion in first births. Our aim is to compare the evolution of dispersion in age at first birth in countries in Europe, East Asia, North America and South America. Using data from the Human Fertility Database and the Human Fertility Collection, we describe the evolution of the period mean age at first birth and its variance for 21 countries since 1970. In line with previous studies, our results show a widespread pattern of increasing heterogeneity in age at first birth after the onset of the postponement transition, although with marked differences among regions and countries. The greatest heterogeneity can be found in countries where timing of family formation varies greatly among women with different socioeconomic status. Chile and Uruguay, in particular, exhibit the highest heterogeneity even though they are at the beginning of the postponement transition. There is no general explanation of why dispersion increased as the mean age at first birth rose. Further studies in this area should investigate causes and interpretations of this trend, and develop measures for studying heterogeneity in fertility timing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.12765/cpos-2019-07en

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Balbo, Nicoletta; Billari, Francesco C.; Mills, Melinda 2013: Fertility in advanced socie- ties: A review. In: European Journal of Population 29: 1-38 [doi: 10.1007/s10680-012- 9277-y]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Basten, Stuart; Sobotka, Tomáš; Zeman, Kryštof 2014: Future fertility in low fertility countries. In: Lutz, Wolfgang; Butz, William P.; Samir K. C. (Eds.): World Population and Human Capital in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Beets, Gijs 2010: The Demography of the Age at First Birth: The Close Relationship be- tween Having Children and Postponement. In: Beets, Gijs; Schippers, Joop; Le Velde, Egbert R. (Eds): The Future of Motherhood in Western Societies. New York: Springer: 61-90 [doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8969-4_6]. · DOI
  4. Billari, Francesco C. 2004: Becoming an adult in Europe: A macro (/micro)-demographic perspective. In: Demographic Research 3,2: 15-44 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3. · DOI
  5. Billari, Francesco C.; Liefbroer, Aart C. 2010: Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? In: Advances in Life Course Research 15,2-3: 59-75 [doi: 10.1016/j. alcr.2010.10.003]. · DOI
  6. Billari, Francesco C.; Liefbroer, Aart C.; Philipov, Dimiter 2006: The postponement of childbearing in Europe: driving forces and implications. In: Vienna Yearbook of Popu- lation Research 4: 1-17 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2006s1]. · DOI
  7. Bongaarts, John; Sobotka, Tomas 2012: A Demographic Explanation for the Recent Rise in European Fertility. In: Population and Development Review 38,1: 83-120 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00473.x]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bongaarts, John; Watkins, Susan Cott 1996: Social interactions and contemporary fertil- ity transitions. In: Population and development review 22,4: 639-682.
  9. Brückner, Hannah; Mayer, Karl Ulrich 2005: De-standardization of the life course: What it might mean? And if it means anything, whether it actually took place? In: Advances in Life Course Research 9: 27-53 [doi: 10.1016/S1040-2608(04)09002-1]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Burkimsher, Marion 2017: Evolution of the shape of the fertility curve: Why might some countries develop a bimodal curve? In: Demographic Research 37,11: 295-324 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.11. Burkimsher, Marion 2015: Europe-wide fertility trends since the 1990s: Turning the cor- ner from declining first birth rates. In: Demographic Research 32,21: 621-656 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.21. CEPAL 2012: Panorama Social de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: United Nations Publications. · DOI
  11. Chandola, Tarani; Coleman, David A.; Hiorns, R.W. 2002: Distinctive features of age- specific fertility profiles in the English-speaking world: Common patterns in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States, 1970-98. In: Population Studies 56,2: 181-200 [doi: 10.1080/00324720215929]. · DOI
  12. De Valk, Helga; Liefbroer, Aart 2007: Timing Preferences for Women's Family-Life Tran- sitions: Intergenerational Transmission among Migrants and Dutch. In: Journal of Marriage and Family 69,1: 190-206 [doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00353.x]. · DOI
  13. Duclos, Jean-Yves; Esteban, Joan; Ray, Debraj 2004: Polarization: concepts, meas- urements, estimation. In: Econometrica 72,6: 1737-1772 [doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 0262.2004.00552.x]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Elzinga, Cees; Liefbroer Aart 2007: De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. In: European Journal of Population 23,3-4: 225-250 [doi: 10.1007/s10680-007-9133-7]. · DOI
  15. Frejka, Tomas; Jones, Gavin W.; Sardon, Jean-Paul 2010: East Asian childbearing pat- terns and policy developments. In: Population and Development Review 36,3: 579- 606 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00347.x]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Frejka, Tomas; Sardon, Jean-Paul 2006: First birth trends in developed countries: per- sisting parenthood postponement. In: Demographic Research 15,6: 147-180 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.6. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Furstenberg, Frank F.; Rumbaut, Rubén G.; Settersen Jr, Richard A. (Eds.) 2005: On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Goldstein, Joshua; Sobotka, Tomas; Jasilioniene, Aiva 2009: The end of "lowest-low" fertility? In: Population and development review 35,4: 663-699.
  19. Gustafsson, Siv; Kalwij, Adriaan 2006: Education and Postponement of Maternity. Eco- nomic Analysis for Industrialized Countries. Springer [doi: 10.1007/1-4020-4716-9]. · DOI
  20. Gustafsson, Siv; Kenjoh, Eiko; Wetzels, Cecile 2002: The role of education on postpone- ment of maternity in Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden. In: Ruspini, Elisa- betta; Dale, Angela (Eds.): The gender dimension of social change: The contribution of dynamic research to the study of women's life courses. Bristol: The Policy Press: 55-79.
  21. Kohler, Hans-Peter; Billari, Francesco C.; Ortega, José Antonio 2002: The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. In: Population Development Review 28,4: 641-680 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lesthaeghe, Ron 2010: The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transi- tion. In: Population and Development Review 36,2: 2011-251 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728- 4457.2010.00328.x]. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Liefbroer Aart; Billari, Francesco C. 2010: Bringing norms back in: a theoretical and em- pirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour. In: Population, Space and Place 16,4: 287-305 [doi: 10.1002/psp.552]. · DOI
  24. Lima, Everton E.C. et al. 2018: The Emergence of Bimodal Fertility Profiles in Latin Amer- ica. In: Population and Development Review 44,4: 723-743 [doi: 10.1111/padr.12157]. · DOI · Paper page
  25. MacMillan, Ross (Ed.) 2005: The Structure of the Life Course: Standardized? Individual- ized? Differentiated? In: Advances in Life Course Research 9: 1-366.
  26. McLanahan, Sara 2004: Diverging destinies: how children are faring under the Second Demographic Transition. In: Demography 41,4: 607-627 [doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0033]. · DOI
  27. Mills, Melinda et al. 2011: Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. In: Human Reproduction Update 17,6: 848-860 [doi: 10.1093/hu- mupd/dmr026]. · DOI
  28. Nathan, Mathías; Pardo, Ignacio; Cabella, Wanda 2016: Diverging patterns of fertility decline in Uruguay. In: Demographic Research 34,20: 563-586 [doi: 10.4054/Dem- Res.2016.34.20. Neels, Karel; Perelli-Harris, Brienna 2013: Heterogeneity in Demographic Change: The Educational Gradient of New Family Behaviors in Europe and the United States. Pa- per presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans. · DOI
  29. Ní Bhrolcháin, Marie; Beaujouan, Éva 2012: Fertility postponement is largely due to rising education enrolment. In: Population Studies 66,3: 311-327 [doi: 10.1080/00324728.2012.697569]. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Nico, Magda 2014: Variability in the Transitions to Adulthood in Europe: A Critical Ap- proach to De-Standardization of the Life Course. In: Journal of Youth Studies 17,2: 166-82 [doi: 10.1080/13676261.2013.805877]. · DOI
  31. Nicoletti, Cheti; Tanturri, Maria Letizia 2008: Differences in Delaying Motherhood Across European Countries: Empirical Evidence from the ECHP. In: European Journal of Popu- lation 24: 157-183.
  32. Pardo, Ignacio; Cabella, Wanda 2018: A Bimodal Pattern in Age at First Birth in Southern Cone Countries? In: Population Review 57,2: 1-22 [doi: 10.1353/prv.2018.0004]. · DOI
  33. Ravanera, Zenaida; Rajulton, Fernando 2006: Social Status Polarization in the Timing and Trajectories to Motherhood. In: Canadian Studies in Population 33,2: 179-207 [doi: 10.25336/P6Q90M]. · DOI
  34. Rendall, Michael et al. 2010: Increasingly heterogeneous ages at first birth by education in Southern-European and Anglo-American family-policy regimes: A seven-country comparison. In: Population Studies 64,3: 209-227 [doi: 10.1080/00324728.2010.512392]. · DOI
  35. Rindfuss, Ronald 1991: The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. In: Demography 28,4: 493-512 [doi: 10.2307/2061419]. · DOI
  36. Rindfuss, Ronald; Brauner-Otto, Sarah 2008: Institutions and the transition to adult- hood: Implications for fertility tempo in low-fertility settings. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008. Vienna Institute of Demography: Vienna [doi: 10.1553/ populationyearbook2008s57]. · DOI
  37. Rosero-Bixby, Luis; Castro-Martín, Teresa; Martín-García, Teresa 2009: Is Latin America starting to retreat from early and universal childbearing? In: Demographic Research 20,9: 169-194 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.. · DOI
  38. Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver et al. (Eds.): Family Life and Family Policies in Europe, Volume 2, Problems and Issues in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 69-119.
  39. Sobotka, Tomáš 2010: Shifting parenthood to advanced reproductive ages: Trends, causes and consequences. In: Tremmel, Joerg C. (Ed.): A Young Generation Under Pressure? Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag: 129-154 [doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03483- 1_7]. · DOI
  40. Sobotka, Tomáš 2004: Postponement of childbearing and low fertility in Europe. Am- sterdam: Dutch University Press.
  41. Sullivan, Rachel 2005: The age pattern of first-birth rates among U.S. women: the bi- modal 1990s. In: Demography 42,2: 259-273 [doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0018]. Date of submission: 09.03.2018 Date of acceptance: 12.02.2019 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nathan, M., & Pardo, I.
Affiliations
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
Venue
Federal Institute for Population Research
Publisher
Federal Institute for Population Research
Published
2019-04-15
Volume
44
OpenAlex
W2936793343
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bundesinstitut für Bevolkerungsforschung (CPoS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bundesinstitut für Bevolkerungsforschung (CPoS)
  • Comparative Population Studies (cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
fertility postponement, age at first birth, socioeconomic status, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review