Cited by 236Digital Platforms and EconomicsProduct Development and CustomizationInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Digitization and Phase Transitions in Platform Organizing Logics: Evidence from the Process Automation Industry

Open access
Sandberg, Johan, Holmström, Jonny, Lyytinen, Kalle·2020·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

This paper draws on complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory to explore the transformation of an analog automation product platform as it was infused with extensive and deepening digital capacities over a 40-year period. Our case demonstrates how the deepening digitization of components and functions drives complexity by connecting the platform to multiple social and technical settings and producing new interactions and information exchanges. The increased connectivity and dynamism invited unexpected and significant architectural and organizational shifts that moved the platform toward an ecosystem-centered organizing logic. CAS theory and its notion of constrained generating procedures (CGPs) are used to analyze how new connections and interactions produced a multilevel and nonlinear change in the platform organization. We offer two main contributions. First, we provide a novel empirical analysis of how product platform digitization leads to phase transitions and show the mediating role of three mechanisms in this process treated as CGPs: interaction rules, design control, and stimuli-response variety. Second, we demonstrate the multilevel and recursive nature of digitally driven growth in physical product platforms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2020/14520

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandberg, J., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K.
Affiliations
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Sandberg, Johan
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2020-03-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
129-154
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W3009843608
Cited by
236
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 7
FWCI
30.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
phase transitions, complex adaptive systems, interaction rules, design control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review