Cited by 40Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Demographic and clinical predictors of response to internet-enabled cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety.

Open access
Catarino, Ana, Bateup, Sarah, Tablan, Valentin, Innes, Katherine, Freer, Stephen, Richards, Andy, Stott, Richard, Hollon, Steven D. +3 more·2018·BJPsych Open

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common mental health problems affect a quarter of the population. Online cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is increasingly used, but the factors modulating response to this treatment modality remain unclear. AIMS: This study aims to explore the demographic and clinical predictors of response to one-to-one CBT delivered via the internet. METHOD: Real-world clinical outcomes data were collected from 2211 NHS England patients completing a course of CBT delivered by a trained clinician via the internet. Logistic regression analyses were performed using patient and service variables to identify significant predictors of response to treatment. RESULTS: Multiple patient variables were significantly associated with positive response to treatment including older age, absence of long-term physical comorbidities and lower symptom severity at start of treatment. Service variables associated with positive response to treatment included shorter waiting times for initial assessment and longer treatment durations in terms of the number of sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of which patient and service variables are associated with good clinical outcomes can be used to develop personalised treatment programmes, as part of a quality improvement cycle aiming to drive up standards in mental healthcare. This study exemplifies translational research put into practice and deployed at scale in the National Health Service, demonstrating the value of technology-enabled treatment delivery not only in facilitating access to care, but in enabling accelerated data capture for clinical research purposes. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: A.C., S.B., V.T., K.I., S.F., A.R., A.H. and A.D.B. are employees or board members of the sponsor. S.R.C. consults for Cambridge Cognition and Shire. Keywords: Anxiety disorders; cognitive behavioural therapies; depressive disorders; individual psychotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2018.57

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Lin M, Lucas HC. Too big to fail: large samples and the p -value problem. Inf Syst Res 2013; 24: 938–9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Catarino, A., Bateup, S., Tablan, V., Innes, K., Freer, S., Richards, A., Stott, R., Hollon, S. D., Chamberlain, S. R., Hayes, A., & Blackwell, A. D.
Affiliations
  • ieso Digital Health (UK) Ltd. (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Catarino, Ana
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2018-09
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
411-418
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894921310
Cited by
40
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (110,049/Z/15/Z, /Z/15/Z, 110049)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, online therapy, predictors of treatment response, depression, anxiety disorders, individual psychotherapy, waiting time, treatment duration, symptom severity, somatic comorbidity, personalized treatment, NHS England

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review