Cited by 119Recommender Systems and TechniquesAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

My Mobile Music: An Adaptive Personalization System for Digital Audio Players

Open access
Chung, Tuck Siong, Rust, Roland T., Wedel, Michel·2009·Marketing Science

Abstract

New information technologies increasingly make it possible for service providers to adaptively personalize their service, fine-tuning the service over time for each individual customer, based on observation of that customer's behavior. We propose an “Adaptive Personalization System” and illustrate its implementation for digital audio players, a product category with rapidly expanding sales. The proposed system automatically downloads personalized playlists of MP3 songs into a consumer's mobile digital audio device and requires little proactive user effort (i.e., no explicit indication of preferences or ratings for songs). The system works in real time and is scalable to the massive data typically encountered in personalization applications. A simulation study shows the Adaptive Personalization System to outperform benchmark approaches. We implemented the Adaptive Personalization System on Palm PDAs and tested its performance with digital audio users. For actual users, the Adaptive Personalization System provides substantial improvements over benchmark approaches both in terms of the number of songs listened to and listening duration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mksc.1080.0371

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most common applications of thinking AI in marketing are various personalized recommendation systems, such as Netflix movie recommendations and Amazon cross-selling recommendations.

    “The most common applications in marketing are various personalized recommendation systems (Chung et al. 2009; Chung et al. 2016), such as Netflix movie recommendations and Amazon cross-selling recommendations.”

    From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Chung et al. 2009

    In the section labeled “Table of Contents” (page not provided), the paper develops a personalized music recommendation system and discusses recommendation systems in marketing literature. It does not establish that these are the most common marketing applications or mention Netflix movie recommendations or Amazon cross-selling. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The academic literature on AI in marketing can be sorted into four main types: technical AI algorithms, customers' psychological reactions, effects of AI on jobs and society, and managerial and strategic issues.

    “The academic literature on AI in marketing may be sorted into four main types. These are (1) technical AI algorithms for solving specific marketing problems (e.g., Chung et al. 2009; Chung et al. 2016; Dzyabura and Hauser 2011, 2019), (2) customers ' psychological reactions to AI (e.g., Luo et al. 2019; Mende et al. 2019), (3) effects of AI on jobs and society (e.g., Autor and Dorn 2013; Frey and”

    From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Chung et al. 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hoeting, Jennifer A., David Madigan, Adrian E. Raftery, Chris T. Volinsky. 1999. Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial. Statistical Science. 14(4), 382-417.
  2. Holbrook, Morris B., Meryl P. Gardner. 1993. An Approach to Investigating the Emotional Determinants of Consumption Durations: Why Do People Consumer What They Consumer For As Long As They Consumer It? Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2(2), 123-142.
  3. Konstan, Joseph, Bradley N. Miller, David Maltz, Jonathan Herlocker, et al. 1997. Grouplens: Applying Collaborative Filtering to USENET news. Communications of the ACM. 40(3), 77-87.
  4. Raghu, T.S., P.K. Kannan, H.R. Rao, Andrew B. Whinston. 2001. Dynamic Profiling of Consumers for Customized Offerings Over the Internet: A Model And Analysis. Decision Support System. 32(2001), 117-134.
  5. Verdinelli, Isabella. 1992. Advances in Bayesian Experimental Design. Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford University Press. 467-481.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, T. S., Rust, R. T., & Wedel, M.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Marketing Science
Published
2009-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
52-68
ISSN
  • 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-548X
OpenAlex
W2043115469
Cited by
119
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, India
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
adaptive personalization, digital music players, personalized playlists, MP3, mobile music, user behavior observation, recommender systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review