Cited by 1,185AI in Service InteractionsCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyService and Product Innovation

Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service

Huang, Ming-Hui, Rust, Roland T.·2021·Journal of Service Research

Abstract

This article develops a strategic framework for using artificial intelligence (AI) to engage customers for different service benefits. This framework lays out guidelines of how to use different AIs to engage customers based on considerations of nature of service task, service offering, service strategy, and service process. AI develops from mechanical, to thinking, and to feeling. As AI advances to a higher intelligence level, more human service employees and human intelligence (HI) at the intelligence levels lower than that level should be used less. Thus, at the current level of AI development, mechanical service should be performed mostly by mechanical AI, thinking service by both thinking AI and HI, and feeling service mostly by HI. Mechanical AI should be used for standardization when service is routine and transactional, for cost leadership, and mostly at the service delivery stage. Thinking AI should be used for personalization when service is data-rich and utilitarian, for quality leadership, and mostly at the service creation stage. Feeling AI should be used for relationalization when service is relational and high touch, for relationship leadership, and mostly at the service interaction stage. We illustrate various AI applications for the three major AI benefits, providing managerial guidelines for service providers to leverage the advantages of AI as well as future research implications for service researchers to investigate AI in service from modeling, consumer, and policy perspectives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094670520902266

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Ming-Hui
Venue
Journal of Service Research
Published
2020-02-21
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
30-41
ISSN
  • 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7379
OpenAlex
W3008828973
Cited by
1,185
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 298 · 2025: 283 · 2024: 239 · 2023: 161 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 20
FWCI
35.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Service Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 104-2410-H-002-142-MY3, MOST 106-2410-H-002-056-MY3, MOST 107-2410-H-002-115-MY3)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
artificial intelligence in services, customer engagement, service strategy, human-AI collaboration, service standardization, personalized services, service delivery, service creation, service interaction, cost leadership, quality leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review