CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 837Digital Marketing and Social MediaMarketing and Advertising StrategiesComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test

Godes, David, Mayzlin, Dina·2009·Marketing Science
DOI 10.1287/mksc.1080.0444
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of a firm's proactive management of customer-to-customer communication. We are particularly interested in understanding how, if at all, the firm should go about effecting meaningful word-of-mouth (WOM) communications. To tackle this problem, we collect data from two sources: (1) we implement a large-scale field test in which a national firm created word of mouth through two populations: customers and noncustomers, and (2) we collect data from an online experiment. We break our theoretical problem into two subproblems. First, we ask: “What kind of WOM drives sales?” Motivated by previous research, we hypothesize that for a product with a low initial awareness level, WOM that is most effective at driving sales is created by less loyal (not highly loyal) customers and occurs between acquaintances (not friends). We find support for this in the field test as well as in an experimental setting. Hence, we demonstrate the potential usefulness of exogenously created WOM: conversations are created where none would naturally have occured otherwise. Then, we ask: “Which agents are most effective at creating this kind of WOM?” In particular, we are interested in evaluating the effectiveness of the commonly used opinion leader designation. We find that although opinion leadership is useful in identifying potentially effective spreaders of WOM among very loyal customers, it is less useful for the sample of less loyal customers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mksc.1080.0444

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Cialdini R., 2005, Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives, 143
  2. Engel J. E., 1969, J. Advertising Res., 9, 3
  3. Godes D., 2004, Case Study: Hasbro Games—POX
  4. Holmes J. H., 1977, J. Advertising Res., 17, 35
  5. Katz E., 1955, Personal Influence
  6. Keller E., 2003, The Influentials
  7. Khermouch G., 2001, Bus. Week, 50
  8. McConnell B., 2003, Creating Customer Evangelists
  9. O'Malley G., 2005, MediaPost
  10. Neff J., 2006, Advertising Age
  11. Petty R. E., 2005, Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives, 81
  12. Reichheld F. F., 1990, Harvard Bus. Rev., 68, 105
  13. Swan J. E., 1989, J. Retailing, 65, 516
  14. Verlegh P. W. J., 2004, Adv. Consumer Res., 31, 304
  15. Walker R., 2004, New York Times

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 837

Related

Metadata

Authors
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Marketing Science
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Published
2009-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
721-739
ISSN
  • 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-548X
DOI
10.1287/mksc.1080.0444
OpenAlex
W2132559268
Cited by
837
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 53
FWCI
155.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
word of mouth, opinion leadership, customer loyalty, sales effectiveness, customer awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review