The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Online Communications on Firm Sales
Abstract
Interpersonal communications have long been recognized as an influential source of information for consumers. Internet-based media have facilitated information exchange among firms and consumers, as well as observability and measurement of such exchanges. However, much of the research addressing online communication focuses on ratings collected from online forums. In this paper, we look beyond ratings to a more comprehensive view of online communications. We consider the sales effect of the volume of positive, negative, and neutral online communications captured by Web crawler technology and classified by automated sentiment analysis. Our modeling approach captures two key features of our data, dynamics and endogeneity. In terms of dynamics, we model daily measures of online communications about a firm and its products as contributing to a latent demand-generating stock variable. To account for the endogeneity, we extend the latent instrumental variable technique to account for dynamic endogenous regressors. Our results demonstrate a significant effect of positive, negative, and neutral online communications on daily sales performance. Failure to account for endogeneity results in a severe attenuation of the estimated effects. From a managerial perspective, we demonstrate the importance of accounting for communication valence as well as the impact of shocks to positive, negative, and neutral online communications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0071 · Cited by 2,601
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.69 · Cited by 2,355
Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2009) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1080.0444 · Cited by 837 · cited 6×
“Previous research has noted the increasing propensity of firms to attempt to initiate word-of-mouth communications among existing and potential customers (Godes and Mayzlin 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom Generic to Branded: A Model of Spillover in Paid Search Advertising
Rutz, O. J., & Bucklin, R. E. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.1.87 · Cited by 360
Self-citation
Cited by
Digital marketing: a framework, review, and research agenda
Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. “. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006 · Cited by 1,707
What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature
King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001 · Cited by 1,017
Goh, K. Y., Heng, C. S., & Lin, Z. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2048614 · Cited by 799
Social Media Metrics — A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media
Peters, K., Chen, Y., Kaplan, A. M., Ognibeni, B., & Pauwels, K. (2013) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007 · Cited by 657
Social media's slippery slope: challenges, opportunities and future research directions
Schultz, D. E., & Peltier, J. (. (2013) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-12-2012-0054 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Sonnier, G. P., McAlister, L., & Rutz, O. J.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 702-716
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W1984542298
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 40.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Online Communications on Firm Sales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mksc.1110.0642
- The paper
- Sonnier, G. P., McAlister, L., & Rutz, O. J. (2011). A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Online Communications on Firm Sales. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.