The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice
Open accessAbstract
Based upon a recently developed multiattribute generalization of prospect theory's value function (Tversky and Kahneman 1991), we argue that consumer choice is influenced by the position of brands relative to multiattribute reference points, and that consumers weigh losses from a reference point more than equivalent sized gains (loss aversion). We sketch implications of this model for understanding brand choice. We develop a multinomial logit formulation of a reference-dependent choice model, calibrating it using scanner data. In addition to providing better fit in both estimation and forecast periods than a standard multinomial logit model, the model's coefficients demonstrate significant loss aversion, as hypothesized. We also discuss the implications of a reference-dependent view of consumer choice for modeling brand choice, demonstrate that loss aversion can account for asymmetric responses to changes in product characteristics, and examine other implications for competitive strategy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This work has been supported by analyses of real world data that show similar behavior in, among other situations, stock markets (26–28), the pricing and purchasing of consumables (29, 30) and condominiums (31), and the choice of work hours by cabdrivers (32).”
From Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion (2009) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 924
The Effects of Customer-Centric Marketing and Revenue Management on Travelers’ Choices
Mathies, C., Gudergan, S. P., & Wang, P. Z. (2013) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287513478499 · Cited by 27
“Hardie, Johnson, and Fader (1993) have adopted a similar approach in evaluating reference points for price and quality.”
BackgroundTerzi, A., Koedijk, K. C. G., NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Pownall, R. A. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01347 · Cited by 26
The influence of reference effect on pricing strategies in revenue management settings
Yang, H., Zhang, D., & Zhang, C. (2017) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.12371 · Cited by 26
“Among these models, memory-based reference price models have been validated by empirical studies and accepted as an empirical generalization (Hardie et al., 1993; Greenleaf, 1995; Briesch et al., 1997; Mazumdar et al., 2005).”
MethodInventory Decisions in the Presence of Strategic Customers: Theory and Behavioral Evidence
Zhang, Y., Mantin, B., & Wu, Y. (2018) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12926 · Cited by 27
“Hariss et al. (2016) accounts for consumers’ price-based quality perceptions to reveal that retailers are better off announcing and committing to a markdown strategy.”
BackgroundCerulli-Harms, A., Goette, L. F., & Sprenger, C. D. (2019) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20170271 · Cited by 26
“286) In addition to the decision elements indicated by Kahneman and Tversky (1979), researchers have suggested reference points of current brand attributes (Hardie et al., 1993), par on a golf hole (Pope and Schweitzer, 2011), a daily wage target (Camerer et al.”
BackgroundDynamic Pricing Under Consumer Reference‐Price Effects
Arslan, H., & Kachani, S. (2011) · Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science · doi:10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0273 · Cited by 29
13 The Creative Action Theory of Creativity
Carruthers, P. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0013 · Cited by 27
Profiling behavioral pricing research in marketing
Somervuori, O. (2014) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-06-2014-0653 · Cited by 26
A prospect theory model of goal behavior
Wu, G., Heath, C., & Larrick, R. P. (2008) · Cited by 30
Karande, K. W., & Magnini, V. P. (2010) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/1096348010384477 · Cited by 25
“The primary theoretical underpinning for a reference price is Helson’s (1964) adaptation-level theory.”
BackgroundReference points in consumer choice models: A review and future research agenda
Wang, P., Sun, L., Zhang, L., & Niraj, R. (2020) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12637 · Cited by 25
Job preferences as revealed by employee-initiated job changes
Grund, C. (2013) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.804689 · Cited by 25
“There is some support of expectancy theory (Wanous et al. 1983) as well as of multiattributive prospect theory respectively endowment effects in job choice and other decision situations (Hardie et al. 1993, Grund 2003).”
BackgroundSimulation Modeling of Consumers' Participation in Product Take-Back Systems
Mashhadi, A. R., Esmaeilian, B., & Behdad, S. (2016) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4032773 · Cited by 25
Ma, D., Li, K., Hu, J., & Wang, X. (2024) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2024.103579 · Cited by 25
The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli
Lee, S. A., Lee, M. J., Kim, B. W., Gilman, J. M., Kuster, J. K., Blood, A. J., Kuhnen, C. M., & Breiter, H. C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135216 · Cited by 23
“Formalized by prospect theory (PT) in the context of monetary gambles [3], LA has been quantified across multiple studies [4–6], and can explain a broad array of data [7–9] and human experiments [10–11].”
Background2 Is Innateness a Confused Concept?
Samuels, R. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0002 · Cited by 25
The Prominence Effect in Shanghai Apartment Prices
Hsee, C. K., Dubé, J., & Zhang, Y. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.2.133 · Cited by 24
“Almost all products involve a trade-off between quality and price; consumers often consider quality more important than price (Simonson and Tversky 1992), and quality may frequently carry more weight than price in consumers’ choices (Hardie, Johnson, and Fader 1993).”
BackgroundPerceived Versus Negotiated Discounts: The Role of Advertised Reference Prices in Price Negotiations
Jindal, P. (2021) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437211034443 · Cited by 24
“7 See, for example, Lattin and Bucklin (1989), Hardie et al. (1993), Mazumdar”
BackgroundResearch on Quality Decisions and Coordination with Reference Effect in Dual-Channel Supply Chain
Zhou, X., Xu, B., Fei, X., et al. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062296 · Cited by 23
Hong, K., Zou, Y., Zhu, M., et al. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10020124 · Cited by 23
“the results show that consumers are more likely to refer to losses rather than gains of the same size, which reflects the preference of loss aversion [65].”
BackgroundLoss Aversion for Quality in Consumer Choice
O’Curry, S., Lovallo, D. P., & Caringal, C. (2004) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/031289620402900109 · Cited by 25
“…effects for price have been demonstrated experimentally in many settings (e.g. Kalyanaram & Little 1994; Kalwani & Yim 1992; Mayhew & Winer 1992), while reference effects for quality were demonstrated by Hardie, Johnson, and Fader (1993) with scanner data from the refrigerated orange juice market.”
BackgroundThe Budget Contraction Effect: How Contracting Budgets Lead to Less Varied Choice
Carlson, K. A., Wolfe, J., Blanchard, S. J., Huber, J. C., & Dan Ariely, C. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0243 · Cited by 22
Understanding risky bidding: a prospect‐contingent perspective
Hartono, B., & Yap, C. M. (2011) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2011.569733 · Cited by 23
“Loss aversion is another proposition of prospect theory hypothesizing that losses loom larger than gains (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979; Hardie et al ., 1993).”
BackgroundBruyn, A. D., & Prokopec, S. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.002 · Cited by 25
“Extending their inquiry beyond prices, Hardie, Johnson, and Fader (1993) demonstrate that consumers' preferences are also reference-dependent when it comes to multi-attribute and brand choices.”
BackgroundWilliams, G., & Rolfe, J. C. (2017) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.004 · Cited by 23
How Unequal Perceptions of User Reviews Impact Price Competition
Pekgün, P., Galbreth, M. R., & Ghosh, B. P. (2017) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/deci.12273 · Cited by 23
An analysis of asymmetric demand response to price changes: The case of local telephone calls
Bidwell, M. O., Wang, B. X., & Zona, J. D. (1995) · Journal of Regulatory Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01070810 · Cited by 23
Managing initial expectations when word-of-mouth matters
Yi, S., & Ahn, J. (2017) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2015-0752 · Cited by 22
Does effective cost transparency increase price fairness? An analysis of apparel brand strategies
Jung, S., Cho, H. J., & Jin, B. E. (2020) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-020-00191-w · Cited by 22
Comparing Competing Systems: An Extension of the Information Systems Continuance Model
Lin, J., Yin, J., Wei, K., Chan, H. C., & Teo, H. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/12309 · Cited by 22
Consumers' utilization of reference prices: the moderating role of involvement
Chandrashekaran, R. (2012) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610421211203141 · Cited by 22
Pricing strategies with reference effects in competitive industries
Coulter, B., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (2013) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.12051 · Cited by 22
“Similarly, Hardie et al. (1993) extend this concept of reference point to determine the effect of product quality on brand choice.”
BackgroundLu, M., & Jen, W. (2016) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20921 · Cited by 22
Song, H., Ran, L., & Shang, J. S. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.034 · Cited by 22
Chung, H.-K., Glimcher, P. W., & Tymula, A. A. (2019) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20170112 · Cited by 22
Antecedents to consumer reference price orientation: an exploratory investigation
Yin, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2007) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610420710763958 · Cited by 22
Attribute Identities Matter: Subjective Perceptions of Attribute Characteristics
Luce, M. F., Bettman, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (2000) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1008159022055 · Cited by 22
Role of price and quality tiers on the cluster effect in brand choice
Sivakumar, K. (1995) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/bf00996190 · Cited by 22
A study of brand preference : an experiential view
Ebrahim, R. S. (2013) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) · Cited by 23
Nicolau, J. L., Shin, H., Kim, B., & O’Connell, J. F. (2022) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875221093014 · Cited by 22
“While prospect theory has been widely adopted in economics and business literature, inconsistencies have been found in results about the existence and the impact of loss aversion on decision making (e.g. Hardie, Johnson, and Fader 1993; Raman and Bass 2002).”
BackgroundJiang, H., Cao, J., & Shen, Z. M. (2020) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.1134 · Cited by 21
Effects of loss aversion on neural responses to loss outcomes: An event-related potential study
Kokmotou, K., Cook, S., Xie, Y., Wright, H., Soto, V., Fallon, N. B., Giesbrecht, T., Pantelous, A. A., & Stančák, A. (2017) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.04.005 · Cited by 23
Gross, H. P., Rottler, M., & Wallmeier, F. (2020) · Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.1681 · Cited by 21
Reconciling Loss Aversion and Gain Seeking in Judged Emotions
Mellers, B. A., Yin, S., & Berman, J. Z. (2021) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721421992043 · Cited by 21
Modeling Behavioral Regularities of Consumer Learning in Conjoint Analysis
Bradlow, E. T., Hu, Y., & Ho, T. (2004) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.4.392.47020 · Cited by 21
Regulatory Focus: A Promising Concept for Marketing Research
Boesen-Mariani, S., Gomez, P., & Gavard-Perret, M.-L. (2010) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/205157071002500104 · Cited by 21
System 1 Is Not Scope Insensitive: A New, Dual-Process Account of Subjective Value
Schley, D. R., de Langhe, B., & Long, A. R. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaa015 · Cited by 21
Consistent Consumer Responses to Price Changes
Scriven, J. G., & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (2004) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/s1441-3582(04)70104-4 · Cited by 21
From Individual Biases to Organizational Errors
Lovallo, D. P. (1996) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-13389-5_5 · Cited by 20
Quality Reference in Consumer Product Recalls
Dong, Y. T., Xu, K., Song, S., et al. (2020) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/deci.12453 · Cited by 20
Joint pricing and quality decision model under stochastic reference quality effect
Cao, Y., & Duan, Y. (2020) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.12916 · Cited by 20
The “holiday effect” in consumer satisfaction: Evidence from review ratings
Deng, L., Ye, Q., Xu, D., & Sun, F. (2023) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2023.103863 · Cited by 22
New product pricing strategy under customer asymmetric anchoring
Park, J.-H., MacLachlan, D. L., & Love, E. (2011) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.04.003 · Cited by 20
Self‐protection vs opportunity seeking in business buying behavior: an experimental study
Jacob, F., & Ehret, M. (2006) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/10610420610651331 · Cited by 20
Building-Up versus Paring-Down: Consumer Responses to Recommendations When Customizing
Coker, B. L. S., & Nagpal, A. (2013) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2012.11.002 · Cited by 20
Perceived inflation under loss aversion
Dräger, L., Menz, J.-O., & Fritsche, U. (2013) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2013.844328 · Cited by 20
“Developed as an alternative decision theory under risk and uncertainty opposed to traditional expected utility theory, Prospect Theory proposes that individuals code price changes and evaluate them against a reference price, This relates well to studies of loss aversion in other areas, where approximately the same par…”
BackgroundSimilarities and differences between stockpiling and reference effects
Slonim, R. L., & Garbarino, E. (2008) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.1453 · Cited by 18
Online consumers’ reactions to price decreases: Amazon’s Kindle 2 case
Lee, K. Y., Jin, Y., Rhee, C., & Yang, S. (2016) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-04-2014-0097 · Cited by 20
Optimal portfolio choice with loss aversion over consumption
Curatola, G. (2017) · The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.qref.2017.04.003 · Cited by 20
The Bright Side of Loss Aversion in Dynamic and Competitive Markets
Kuksov, D., & Wang, K. (2014) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2014.0847 · Cited by 16
“…r es er ve d. reference price may be affected by past prices (e.g., Winer 1986, Lattin and Bucklin 1989, Bolton et al. 2003), competitors’ prices (Hardie et al. 1993, Rajendran and Tellis 1994), and future price expectations (Kalwani and Yim 1992), as well as other factors such as the purpose…”
BackgroundThe relative influence of pioneer and follower price on reference price and value perceptions
Lowe, B., & Alpert, F. H. (2010) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610421011086928 · Cited by 20
Sivakumar, K. (1996) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.1996.11501712 · Cited by 20
Price promotions: examining the buyer mix and subsequent changes in purchase loyalty
Dawes, J. G. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-03-2017-2134 · Cited by 27
Processus de choix construit du consommateur
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (2000) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) · doi:10.1177/076737010001500205 · Cited by 19
Behavioral response to online pricing: empirical and managerial insights
Kalyanaram, G., Saini, G. K., Mony, S., & Jayasankaran, N. (2022) · Journal of Indian Business Research · doi:10.1108/jibr-07-2021-0281 · Cited by 22
Heuristic price theory: A model of pluralistic price evaluations
Thomas, M. (2022) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1087 · Cited by 19
Prospect Theory, the Disposition Effect, and Asset PricesPreprint
Li, Y., & Yang, L. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1781382 · Cited by 19
Cai, Y., Yang, Y., & Cude, B. J. (2008) · Journal of Financial Services Marketing · doi:10.1057/fsm.2008.10 · Cited by 18
Yan, L., Li, X., Teo, K. L., et al. (2022) · RAIRO - Operations Research · doi:10.1051/ro/2022126 · Cited by 18
“In [20], a selection model is considered based on the generalized prospect theory.”
BackgroundOptimal consumer search with prospect utility in hybrid uncertain environment
Zhou, C., Tang, W., & Zhao, R. (2015) · Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1186/s40467-015-0030-z · Cited by 18
“[17] developed a multinomial logit formulation of a reference-dependent choice model.”
MethodNo Evidence of Association between Toxoplasma gondii Infection and Financial Risk Taking in Females
Lanchava, L., Carlson, K., Šebánková, B., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136716 · Cited by 18
“Loss aversion is human’s tendency to overweight losses relative to gains [60,61], a phenomenon that has been repeatedly documented in lab experiments using both money and goods [62–64] and in field data [65–68].”
ResultBuying Brands at Both Regular Price and on Promotion over Time
Scriven, J. G., Clemente, M., Dawes, J. G., Trinh, G. T., & Sharp, B. M. (2017) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.10.006 · Cited by 18
“For example, Hardie et al. (1993) found evidence that past purchases for a brand on-deal made households slightly less likely to buy the brand again at regular price.”
BackgroundShams-Shoaaee, S. S., & Hassini, E. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.020 · Cited by 18
Sense and sensibility of ownership: Type of ownership experience and valuation of goods
Wang, X. T., Ong, L. S., & Tan, J. H. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2015.04.010 · Cited by 18
Liang, A. R.-D., & Chen, H.-G. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.012 · Cited by 19
Unpleasant odors increase aversion to monetary losses
Stančák, A., Xie, Y., Fallon, N. B., Bulsing, P. J., Giesbrecht, T., Thomas, A. K., & Pantelous, A. A. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.02.006 · Cited by 22
Consumer perceptions of bundles
Nguyen, A., Heeler, R. M., & Buff, C. L. (2009) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610420910957843 · Cited by 18
“), or the price of a comparable product (relative prices) ( Hardie et al. , 1993”
BackgroundReasons for variation in SCR for private label brands
Dawes, J. G. (2013) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2011-0337 · Cited by 18
Shen, F. (2014) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-12-2013-0463 · Cited by 18
Effect of strategy, structure and performance variables on store brand market share
Oubiña, J., Rubio, N., & Guillén, M. J. Y. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1362/026725707x250449 · Cited by 18
Consumers’ choice of private label considering reference price and moderating effect
Mao, Z., Duan, Y., & Liu, W. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103216 · Cited by 19
Comparing theories of reference-dependent choice.
Bhatia, S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000384 · Cited by 17
Leslie, A. M., Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0007 · Cited by 17
The big carrot: High‐stakes incentives revisited
Brañas‐Garza, P., García‐Muñoz, T., & Neuman, S. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.657 · Cited by 17
Price‐tier competition: an integrative review
Sivakumar, K. (2000) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610420010347083 · Cited by 17
Optimal Contracts for Loss Averse ConsumersPreprint
Carbajal, J. C., & Ely, J. C. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 17
4 Innateness and Genetic Information
Godfrey‐Smith, P. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0004 · Cited by 19
Yan, J., Tian, K., Heravi, S. M., & Morgan, P. (2016) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2015-0356 · Cited by 16
Product Upgrades with Stochastic Technology Advancement, Product Failure, and Brand Commitment
Kirshner, S. N., Levin, Y., & Nediak, M. S. (2016) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12680 · Cited by 15
The effects of relative and referent thinking on tourism product design
Yu, S. M.-F., Liang, A. R.-D., & Lin, C. (2019) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.001 · Cited by 17
Zhang, Q., Seetharaman, S., & Narasimhan, C. (2011) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2011.08.004 · Cited by 16
Asymmetric quality‐tier competition: an alternative explanation
Sivakumar, K. (2007) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610420710823771 · Cited by 16
Meyer, R. J., Vosgerau, J., Singh, V., Urbany, J. E., Zauberman, G. S., Norton, M. I., Cui, T. H., Ratchford, B. T., Acquisti, A., Bell, D., et al. (2010) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-010-9109-y · Cited by 15
“Reference price dependence has been empirically demonstrated in marketing contexts (e.g., Kalyanaram and Winer 1995) and, together with loss aversion, incorporated in consumer choice models (e.g., Hardie et al. 1993).”
Assessing price elasticity for private labels and national brands by store locations
Huang, M., Jones, E., Hahn, D. E., et al. (2010) · Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management · doi:10.1057/rpm.2010.32 · Cited by 16
“Hardie et al (1993) conclude that reference dependence and loss aversion (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) could result in a high-quality brand benefiting more from a price reduction than from a low-quality brand.”
Option Framing and Product Feature Recommendations: Product Configuration and Choice
Herrmann, A. P., Hildebrand, C., Sprott, D. E., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2013) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20666 · Cited by 16
Neuroanatomía de las decisiones financieras
Bermejo, P. E., Dorado, R., Zea‐Sevilla, M. A., & Menéndez, V. S. (2010) · Neurología · doi:10.1016/j.nrl.2010.09.015 · Cited by 19
Dix ans de recherches sur la psychologie et le comportement des consommateurs face aux promotions
Chandon, P. (1994) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) · doi:10.1177/076737019400900305 · Cited by 16
Chen, C.-C. (2018) · Asia Pacific Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.06.001 · Cited by 16
Evolution of Mobile Banking Regulations: A Case Study on Legislator's Behavior
Ashta, A. (2017) · Strategic Change · doi:10.1002/jsc.2105 · Cited by 16
Sivakumar, K. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00267-9 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S.
- Affiliations
- London Business School (GB)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 378-394
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2074270109
- Cited by
- 903
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 38.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Keywords
- loss aversion, reference dependence, brand choice, prospect theory, multinomial logistic regression, scanner data, asymmetric price response, competitive strategy, consumer choice modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review