The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User Satisfaction with Computer-Mediated Communication Systems
Abstract
Interactive computer systems should be viewed as “socio-technical” systems whose acceptance is influenced by an interaction among characteristics of the individual users, the groups and organizations in which they are implemented, and the computer systems themselves. Four months after completing baseline questionnaires, new users of four computer-mediated communication systems (CMCS) answered follow-up questionnaires which included a number of items measuring subjective satisfaction. Factor analysis identified two primarily instrumental dimensions (satisfaction with the Interface and with system Performance), and two primarily social-emotional dimensions (Unexpressive—perceived inadequacy of the system for expressive, emotional, or personal communication—and Mode Problems with computer-mediated communication). The strongest correlates of Interface satisfaction are differences in system software and documentation, interacting with baseline attitudes and characteristics of the individual users. By contrast, the strongest correlates of the Unexpressive factor include such group-level variables as frequency of previous (off-line) communication with the group, and attitudes towards the group task. Thus to insure a successful implementation, managers must consider the “fit” between a CMCS and a particular work group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement
Swanson, E. B. (1974) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.21.2.178 · Cited by 529
Goodwin, N. C. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/214748.214758 · Cited by 277
Gratifications Sought and Media Exposure: An Expectancy Value Model
PALMGREEN, P., & RAYBURN, J. D. (1982) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365082009004004 · Cited by 243
Cited by
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 · Cited by 3,879
Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence
Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070301291002 · Cited by 2,002
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(00)00031-x · Cited by 1,376
Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams
Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045697 · Cited by 736
Metadata
- Authors
- Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 739-764
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W1990599378
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 30.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: User Satisfaction with Computer-Mediated Communication Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.739
- The paper
- Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K. (1990). User Satisfaction with Computer-Mediated Communication Systems. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.