The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect
Abstract
Consider a series of companies in a supply chain, each of whom orders from its immediate upstream member. In this setting, inbound orders from a downstream member serve as a valuable informational input to upstream production and inventory decisions. This paper claims that the information transferred in the form of “orders” tends to be distorted and can misguide upstream members in their inventory and production decisions. In particular, the variance of orders may be larger than that of sales, and the distortion tends to increase as one moves upstream—a phenomenon termed “bullwhip effect.” This paper analyzes four sources of the bullwhip effect: demand signal processing, rationing game, order batching, and price variations. Actions that can be taken to mitigate the detrimental impact of this distortion are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0045 · Cited by 1,723
Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.275.82 · Cited by 779
Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource‐based theory perspective
Barratt, M., & Oke, A. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.003 · Cited by 702
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation
Kapoor, R. (2018) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1186/s41469-018-0035-4 · Cited by 504
The causes of food waste in the supplier–retailer interface: Evidences from the UK and Spain
Mena, C., Adenso-Diaz, B., & Yurt, O. (2011) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.006 · Cited by 473
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management
Plambeck, E. L. (2012) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.031 · Cited by 302
Forecasting and operational research: a review
Fildes, R., Nikolopoulos, K., Crone, S. F., & Syntetos, A. A. (2008) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602597 · Cited by 287
Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making
Lurie, N. H., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.05.005 · Cited by 264
Hofmann, E. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1061222 · Cited by 220
Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation
Macdonald, J. R., Zobel, C. W., Melnyk, S. A., & Griffis, S. E. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787 · Cited by 214
Beaulieu, M., & Bentahar, O. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120717 · Cited by 195
Analysing supply chain integration through a systematic literature review: a normative perspective
Mustafa Kamal, M., & Irani, Z. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2013-0491 · Cited by 139
Supply chain integration through community cloud: Effects on operational performance
Bruque-Cámara, S., Moyano-Fuentes, J., & Maqueira-Marín, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2016.04.003 · Cited by 110
Customization and real time information access in integrated eBusiness supply chain relationships
Klein, R. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.03.001 · Cited by 108
Supply Chain Coordination under Uncertainty
(2011) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19257-9 · Cited by 95
Exploiting the potential of manufacturing network embeddedness: An OM perspective
Golini, R., Deflorin, P., & Scherrer, M. (2016) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-11-2014-0559 · Cited by 43
Assimilation of tracking technology in the supply chain
Basole, R. C., & Nowak, M. (2018) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2016.08.003 · Cited by 42
Organizational adoption of supply chain management system: A multi-theoretic investigation
Cao, Q., Gan, Q., & Thompson, M. A. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.02.003 · Cited by 39
Strategic information technology alliances for effective health-care supply chain management
Shih, S. C., Rivers, P. A., & Hsu, H. Y. S. (2009) · Health Services Management Research · doi:10.1258/hsmr.2009.009003 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 546-558
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2104925392
- Cited by
- 4,698
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 78.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
