The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers
Abstract
We present a framework and empirical estimates that quantify the economic impact of increased product variety made available through electronic markets. While efficiency gains from increased competition significantly enhance consumer surplus, for instance, by leading to lower average selling prices, our present research shows that increased product variety made available through electronic markets can be a significantly larger source of consumer surplus gains. One reason for increased product variety on the Internet is the ability of online retailers to catalog, recommend, and provide a large number of products for sale. For example, the number of book titles available at Amazon.com is more than 23 times larger than the number of books on the shelves of a typical Barnes & Noble superstore, and 57 times greater than the number of books stocked in a typical large independent bookstore. Our analysis indicates that the increased product variety of online bookstores enhanced consumer welfare by $731 million to $1.03 billion in the year 2000, which is between 7 and 10 times as large as the consumer welfare gain from increased competition and lower prices in this market. There may also be large welfare gains in other SKU-intensive consumer goods such as music, movies, consumer electronics, and computer software and hardware.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation of Exact Consumers Surplus and Deadweight Loss
Hausman, J. A., & Newey, W. K. (1995) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171777 · Cited by 284
Cited by
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171452 · Cited by 2,744
Robust De-anonymization of Large Sparse Datasets
Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (sp 2008) · doi:10.1109/sp.2008.33 · Cited by 2,372
Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.08.002 · Cited by 1,317
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0415 · Cited by 1,127
Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0380 · Cited by 1,073
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. (., & Simester, D. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1371 · Cited by 847
Self-citationCan You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity
Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2916 · Cited by 785
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1122 · Cited by 453
Content or Community? A Digital Business Strategy for Content Providers in the Social Age1
Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Zalmanson, L. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.12 · Cited by 422
How Does Popularity Information Affect Choices? A Field Experiment
Tucker, C., & Zhang, J. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1312 · Cited by 322
Evolution of retail formats: past, present, and future
Gauri, D. K., Jindal, R. P., Ratchford, B., Fox, E., Bhatnagar, A., Pandey, A., Navallo, J. R., Fogarty, J., Carr, S., & Howerton, E. (2021) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2020.11.002 · Cited by 287
Effects of Freemium Strategy in the Mobile App Market: An Empirical Study of Google Play
Liu, C. Z., Au, Y. A., & Choi, H. S. (2014) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2014.995564 · Cited by 274
Liminal movement by digital platform‐based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Roberts, A., & Xu, L. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3148 · Cited by 274
Inferring App Demand from Publicly Available Data1
Garg, R., & Telang, R. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.4.12 · Cited by 227
Mobile marketing: A literature review on its value for consumers and retailers
Ström, R., Vendel, M., & Bredican, J. (2014) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.12.003 · Cited by 208
Online and Offline Demand and Price Elasticities: Evidence from the Air Travel Industry
Granados, N., Gupta, A., & Kauffman, R. J. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0312 · Cited by 189
Internet’s Dirty Secret: Assessing the Impact of Online Intermediaries on HIV Transmission1
Chan, J., & Ghose, A. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.01 · Cited by 178
Hiring Preferences in Online Labor Markets: Evidence of a Female Hiring Bias
Chan, J., & Wang, J. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2756 · Cited by 178
Wang, Q., Li, B., & Singh, P. V. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2017.0735 · Cited by 162
Online Product Reviews-Triggered Dynamic Pricing: Theory and Evidence
Feng, J., Li, X., & Zhang, X. (. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0852 · Cited by 117
Tavalaei, M. M., & Cennamo, C. (2021) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101994 · Cited by 101
Match Quality, Search, and the Internet Market for Used Books
Ellison, G., & Ellison, S. F. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24197 · Cited by 53
Barratt, M., Kull, T. J., & Sodero, A. C. (2018) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2018.09.003 · Cited by 47
Determinants of recent online purchasing and the percentage of income spent online.
Hannah, B., & Lybecker, K. M. (2010) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v3n4p60 · Cited by 40
Zhang, X., Ferreira, P., de Matos, M. G., & Belo, R. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/14971 · Cited by 29
(2023) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00157 · Cited by 14
(2015) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. (., & Smith, M. D.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1580-1596
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3124392856
- Cited by
- 1,173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 90.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.