Cited by 29Recommender Systems and TechniquesDigital Platforms and EconomicsConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Welfare Properties of Profit Maximizing Recommender Systems: Theory and Results from a Randomized Experiment

Open access
Zhang, Xiaochen, Ferreira, Pedro, de Matos, Miguel Godinho, Belo, Rodrigo·2021·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Recommender systems have been introduced to help consumers navigate large sets of alternatives. They usually lead to more sales, which may increase consumer surplus and firm profit. In this paper, we ask whether the firms’ choice of recommender system might hurt consumers. We use data from a large-scale field experiment in video-on-demand to measure the price elasticity of demand for movies placed in salient and non-salient slots on the TV screen. During this experiment, the firm randomized the prices and slots in which movies were recommended to consumers. This setting readily allows for identifying the effects of price and slot on demand, and thus computes consumer surplus. We find that consumers are less price-elastic toward movies placed in salient slots. Using the outcomes of this experiment, we simulate how consumer surplus and welfare change when the firm implements several types of recommender systems, namely one that maximizes profit. We show that this system hurts consumer surplus and welfare relative to a system that maximizes welfare. We also show that, in our setting, the system that maximizes profit does not generate less consumer surplus than several recommender systems frequently used in practice. Yet, the amount of extra rent the firm can extract from strategically placing movies in salient slots is still a function of the popularity and quality of movies used to do so. Ultimately, our results question whether recommender systems embed mechanisms that extract excessive surplus from consumers, which may call for better scrutiny.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2021/14971

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In social networks, maximizing user engagement may be achieved by promoting content congruent with users' past engagement or ingroup attitudes, or content that humans inherently attend to, such as emotionally and morally charged content.

    “In social networks, this may be achieved by promoting content congruent with users' past engagement or ingroup attitudes 134 , or content that humans inherently attend to, such as emotionally and morally charged content 135,136 .”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [134]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Ferreira, P., de Matos, M. G., & Belo, R.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics, Palma de Cima, 1649-023 Lisboa Portugal
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
1-43
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W3137926414
Cited by
29
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
recommender systems, consumer surplus, welfare, price elasticity, video on demand, rent extraction, profit maximization, social welfare maximization, recommendation algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review