The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change
Abstract
We investigate the conditions under which managerial cognition affects the timing of incumbent entry into a radical new technological market. We address this question using a longitudinal study of communications technology firms entering the fiber-optics product market. Using a hazard rate model, we investigate the relevance of cognition based on the direction of CEO attention. We find that attention toward the emerging technology and the affected industry is associated with faster entry, and attention to existing technologies is associated with slower progress. Second, we assess the extent to which the effect of cognition is dependent upon the levels of relevant organizational factors and find that CEO attention to the emerging technology may amplify the effects of industry orientation. Managerial cognition is important in understanding organizational outcomes, and considering both the direction of cognition and its interaction with organizational factors provides a more nuanced view of entry behavior. These results contribute to the literatures on incumbent response to technical change and new product development by suggesting that context-specific managerial cognition has a separate and important influence on the degree and direction of strategic renewal. We argue that managerial cognition is therefore a dynamic managerial capability that can shape adaptation by established firms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, fast-paced technological advancements provide late entrants with the possibility of using superior technology to design products that outperform those of early entrants (Eggers and Kaplan 2009).”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Eggers and Kaplan 2009
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426 · cited 2×
“Most attempts to understand dynamic capabilities have operated at the organizational level of analysis ( Eisenhardt and Tabrizi 1995, Hill and Rothaermel 2003), but Adner and Helfat (2003, p. 1012) argued recently that they should be understood at the”
BackgroundCognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131004 · Cited by 1,290
Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants
Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140602 · Cited by 1,058 · cited 1×
“Given the rapidly changing nature of the market and the fact that attention can shift over time (Hambrick et al. 1993), we sought a measure that would capture more directly time-varying attention to issues.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 105
- 10.2307/256674 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0423 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.331 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6451.00136 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0424 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393511 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.9.6.644 · DOI
- 10.2307/3094913 · DOI
- 10.2307/2392616 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393919 · DOI
- Bray R. C., 1997, Hewlett Packard J., 48, 1
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5 · DOI
- 10.2307/3094808 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0145 · DOI
- Caves R. E., 1984, Amer. Econom. Rev., 74, 127
- 10.1002/smj.4250120104 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920639702300101 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1060.0192 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::AID-SMJ804>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.44.12.S207 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.7.2.103 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6451.00067 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1123::AID-SMJ130>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/000282803321455197 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1984.4277657 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.5.2.200 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00061-0 · DOI
- 10.1177/1094428106289252 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- 10.2307/256691 · DOI
- 10.1016/0048-7333(92)90001-K · DOI
- 10.2307/3152066 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0140 · DOI
- 10.2307/2666981 · DOI
- Gilbert R., 1982, Amer. Econom. Rev., 72, 54
- 10.2307/2393985 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199810)19:10<967::AID-SMJ981>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- 10.2307/3440244 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0421 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674038288 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<339::AID-SMJ883>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
- 10.2307/2555761 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250150906 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2003.9416161 · DOI
- Huff A. S., 2000, When Firms Change Direction
- 10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00037-7 · DOI
- Jaffe A. B., 2002, Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, 10.7551/mitpress/5263.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.320 · DOI
- Kaplan S. Framing the future: Cognitive frames, strategic choice and firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. (2004) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School, Cambridge, MA
- 10.5465/amr.2008.33665141 · DOI
- 10.1093/icc/12.2.203 · DOI
- 10.2307/3069433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2392530 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.48.2.171.253 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<997::AID-SMJ134>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.2307/1251866 · DOI
- 10.1177/002194369202900101 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.554 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250090713 · DOI
- Lant T., 2001, Organizational Cognition: Computation and Interpretation
- 10.5465/AMR.2006.19379629 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250090706 · DOI
- 10.1108/eb039016 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00037-1 · DOI
- 10.2307/3069340 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393492 · DOI
- 10.2307/2989896 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299005400403 · DOI
- Nelson R. R., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of the Economic Change
- 10.1002/smj.417 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250090303 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.166 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.7.1.22 · DOI
- Reinganum J. F., 1983, Amer. Econom. Rev., 73, 741
- Roberts C. W., 1997, Text Analysis for the Social Sciences, 275
- 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90046-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.160 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1080.0408 · DOI
- 10.4159/harvard.9780674432864 · DOI
- 10.2307/256224 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00077-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1540-5885.2002004 · DOI
- 10.2307/2392715 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1080.0419 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- 10.2307/2392832 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.42.7.939 · DOI
- 10.1016/0883-9026(86)90004-2 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.3.1.72 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:1+<641::AID-JOB910>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- Wasserman N., Nohria N., Anand B. N. When does leadership matter? The contingent opportunities view of CEO leadership. (2001) . Working Paper 01-063, Harvard Business School, Boston · DOI
- 10.2307/2393593 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0223 · DOI
- Williamson O. E., 1985, Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting
- 10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00017-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 646
On inquiry in futures and foresight science
Rowland, N. J., & Spaniol, M. J. (2020) · Futures & Foresight Science · doi:10.1002/ffo2.37 · Cited by 15
Karaca, V., & Bağış, M. (2024) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-06-2023-0440 · Cited by 14
Mack, D. Z., Cho, T. S., & Yi, A. C. (2023) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/14761270231187090 · Cited by 14
“Although the extant literature has examined the impact of managerial attention on firms’ strategic behaviors based on its directionality (Eggers and Kaplan, 2009; Kaplan, 2008; Nadkarni and Chen, 2014; Yadav et al., 2007) or its intentionality (Bouquet and Birkinshaw, 2008; Cho and Hambrick, 2006;…”
BackgroundInfluentialWang, Y., Turkina, E., Khoury, S., & Lemay, N. (2023) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985626.2023.2223158 · Cited by 17
“Nonetheless, they are reluctant to adapt to the technological transition and to reach out for new partners in time (Eggers and Kaplan 2009; Lavie 2006; Warner and Wäger 2019).”
BackgroundCatching-up during technological windows of opportunity: An industry product categories perspective
Giachetti, C., & Mensah, D. T. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104677 · Cited by 19
Alves, M. F. R., Vastola, V., Galina, S. V. R., & Zollo, M. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1517 · Cited by 14
Learning Strategic Representations: Exploring the Effects of Taking a Strategy Course
Heshmati, M., & Csaszar, F. A. (2021) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2021.11398abstract · Cited by 14
Yang, Y., Chen, T.-X., & Zhang, L. (2016) · doi:10.1108/jsma-03-2015-0023 · Cited by 14
Customer concentration, firm R&D investment and moderation effects
Zhao, S.-M., He, X., Ma, B., & Zuo, W. (2025) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115009 · Cited by 13
Zhou, Z., Zhang, J., & He, C. (2025) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.103906 · Cited by 17
Understanding “reverse” knowledge flows following inventor exit in the semiconductor industry
Varshney, M., & Jain, A. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102638 · Cited by 13
Does restricted stock turn CEOs into risk-averse managers? Insights from the regulatory focus theory
Ma, R., Hou, W., Priem, R., & Wright, P. C. (2021) · Long range planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102165 · Cited by 13
How to perform strategic change? A strategy as practice perspective
Wei, Z., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-04-2019-0140 · Cited by 21
Machine Learning Methods for Strategy ResearchPreprint
Teodorescu, M. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3012524 · Cited by 13
Team mental model characteristics and performance in a simulation experiment
Yang, Y., Narayanan, V. K., Baburaj, Y., & Swaminathan, S. (2016) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-02-2015-0036 · Cited by 12
Incumbent response to business model innovation: The role of CEO opportunity framing
Snihur, Y., Zott, C., & Kiss, A. N. (2025) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1534 · Cited by 16
Entrepreneurship, Digital Capabilities, and Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Case Study
Gao, S.-Y., Ma, X.-H., & Zhao, X. (2022) · Mobile Information Systems · doi:10.1155/2022/5822423 · Cited by 12
“Managers can enhance organizational environmental adaptability by guiding organizational innovation [62].”
BackgroundRetractedLestari, Y. D., Nadia, F. N. D., Sukoco, B. M., Ahlström, D., Widianto, S., Susanto, E., Nasution, R. A., & Fauzi, A. M. (2021) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603124.2021.1974096 · Cited by 22
Narcissistic Leaders and Corporate Cash Holdings: Evidence in China
Qiao, P.-H., Long, Y., Fung, H.-G., & Kao, E. H. C. (2021) · The North American journal of economics and finance · doi:10.1016/j.najef.2021.101567 · Cited by 12
The Effects of Hierarchy on Learning and Performance in Business Experimentation
Ghosh, S., Thomke, S., & Pourkhalkhali, H. (2020) · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2020.159 · Cited by 12
“…in motivating exploratory change in many contexts (Gavetti et al., 2012; Ocasio, 1997), such as when introducing technological innovations (Kaplan, 2008), increasing technological responsiveness to competitors (Eggers and Kaplan, 2009), and the adoption of expansive global strategies (Levy, 2005).”
BackgroundObjective environmental conditions and perceived environmental uncertainty
Weiss, M. A., & Wittmann, C. (2018) · Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change · doi:10.1108/jaoc-11-2016-0079 · Cited by 12
Shang, H., Huang, P.-W., & Guo, Y. (2010) · Nankai Business Review International · doi:10.1108/20408741011082589 · Cited by 12
Enhancing ESG disclosure through AI adoption: the moderating role of institutional quality
Rauf, F., & Qi, B. (2025) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2025.2547117 · Cited by 13
“Given the challenges of direct measurement, an indirect approach was employed (Cho and Hambrick 2006; Eggers and Kaplan 2009; Nadkarni and Barr 2008).”
Green public procurement, external pressures and enterprise green transition: Evidence from China
Gao, J., & Lu, F. (2025) · Journal of Asian Economics · doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2025.101936 · Cited by 12
Kesidou, E., Ri, A., & Roper, S. (2025) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-025-00998-4 · Cited by 10
Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., & Song, Z. (2024) · Emerging Markets Finance and Trade · doi:10.1080/1540496x.2024.2324190 · Cited by 15
“…of executives’ attention is governed by a set of “rules of the game,” encompassing formal and informal principles like incentive systems (Kaplan 2008) and environmental stimuli (Eggers and Kaplan 2009), which shape the process of how executives interpret and form cognitive representations.”
Mundlos, P. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-024-00409-0 · Cited by 15
“They also lead to more ineffective or local search routines (Eggers and Kaplan 2009).”
InfluentialManagement research on the war in Ukraine: Building theory and supporting practitioners
Havrylyshyn, A., Eckardt, R., & Yakushko, N. (2024) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2024.01.003 · Cited by 11
Roth, K., Rau, C., & Neyer, A. (2023) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12600 · Cited by 11
Founder Turnover and Organizational Change
Kim, J. D., & Kim, M. (2023) · Organization science (Providence, R.I.) · doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.1668 · Cited by 11
Xu, S., Yin, H., Hu, Y., & Teng, M.-M. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136604 · Cited by 11
Managing with Style? Microevidence on the Allocation of Managerial AttentionPreprint
Lo, D., Brahm, F., Dessein, W., & Minami, C. (2022) · Management Sciences · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3716407 · Cited by 11
“…evidence of a systematic relationship between expertise-biased attention of managers and firm choices or outcomes (Levy 2005; Cho and Hambrick 2006; Eggers and Kaplan 2009; Kaplan 2008; Nadkarni and Barr 2008; Zhu and Chen 2015; Barker and Mueller 2002; Kaplan, Keblanov, and Sorenson 2012; Kilduff…”
BackgroundCEO Temporal Focus and Corporate Philanthropy: The Moderating Role of Ownership
Nguyen, L., Chen, S.-M., & Ho, K.-K. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211004126 · Cited by 11
“The rates are reported in percentage form to normalize the scores by the total length of the text (Eggers & Kaplan, 2009).”
BackgroundChief Executive Cognition, Turnaround Strategy and Turnaround Attempts of Declining Firms
Liang, X., Barker, V. L., & Schepker, D. J. (2018) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/14697017.2018.1464046 · Cited by 19
“A CEO’s attention pattern has strategic implications for firm adaptation (Eggers & Kaplan, 2009).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDominant logic and dynamic capabilities in strategic renewal - case of public broadcasting
Maijanen, P., Jantunen, A., & Hujala, M. (2014) · International Journal of Business Excellence · doi:10.1504/ijbex.2015.065978 · Cited by 7
He, Q., Wang, C.-F., Deng, C., & Zhou, Y.-F. (2025) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115121 · Cited by 10
Popli, M., Raithatha, M., & Arora, P. (2024) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503241286382 · Cited by 10
“Thus, exposure to research-based initiatives necessitated changes to the existing knowledge structures and decision-makers’ mental models (Eggers & Kaplan, 2009).”
Toukabri, M. (2024) · Society and Business Review · doi:10.1108/sbr-12-2023-0356 · Cited by 10
Effect of top management team attention to digital transformation on innovation activities
Li, B., Zheng, Y., Zheng, W., & Wu, Y. J. (2024) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2024.2390535 · Cited by 12
“In terms of attention intensity, studies have found that innovation results depend on a certain minimum degree of attention (Eggers & Kaplan, 2009), and substantial attention given to customers or suppliers is positively correlated with new product innovation (Ford et al., 2018).”
Toukabri, M., & Kalai, L. (2024) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-024-10153-1 · Cited by 11
“Consequently, our study serves to emphasize the idea that managerial concern given to different decision areas (environmental, climate change crisis), as enabled by specialized managers, explains better company results (Cho and Hambrick 2006; Eggers and Kaplan 2009; Yadav et al. 2007).”
Attentional Uniqueness and Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Growth Actions
Shimizu, T., Nagayama, S., & Yamanoi, J. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13122 · Cited by 9
Borrowing networks for innovation: The role of attention allocation in secondhand brokerage
Rhee, L., & Leonardi, P. (2024) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3585 · Cited by 10
Jantunen, A., Tuppura, A., & Pätäri, S. (2022) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.07.004 · Cited by 10
Zhang, L., Yuan, J.-F., Ning, Y., Xia, N.-N., & Zhang, G.-D. (2021) · Engineering Construction and Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-11-2020-0931 · Cited by 10
McNabb, D. E., & Lee, C.-S. (2020) · Public Sector Strategy Design · doi:10.4324/9781003094654-13 · Cited by 10
The growth of hidden champions in China: a cognitive explanation from integrated view
Lei, L., Wu, X., & Tan, Z. (2020) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-06-2019-0206 · Cited by 14
Srivastava, S., & D’Souza, D. E. (2019) · Journal of strategy and management · doi:10.1108/jsma-05-2019-0077 · Cited by 18
Fisch, J., & Ross, J. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12114 · Cited by 10
Steering managerial attention towards business model innovation: The role of organizational design
Angelshaug, M. S., Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115477 · Cited by 11
CEO Human Capital and Digital Product Innovation: A Dynamic Managerial Capabilities Perspective
Schulz, C., Bendig, D., Kriebel, J., Haubner, K., & Fainshmidt, S. (2025) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.0553 · Cited by 9
Creating New Industries: The Generative Role of Heterogeneous Actors
Agarwal, R., Guerra, M., Moeen, M., & Aversa, P. (2025) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2023.0244 · Cited by 10
Not in‐sourced here! When does external technology sourcing yield familiar versus novel solutions?
Klueter, T. M., Ghosh, A., & Rosenkopf, L. (2024) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3670 · Cited by 10
“Following prior research, we used the established firm's annual report to shareholders to measure top management attention on the therapeutic area addressed by the focal opportunity (Eggers & Kaplan, 2009; Kaplan & Tripsas, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLi, M., & Yang, J.-X. (2023) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-02-2023-0187 · Cited by 9
Attentional control systems for emergent strategic issues in the post-Chandlerian world
Love, E. (2023) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/14761270231199278 · Cited by 9
“…Joseph, 2005; Rerup, 2009), demonstrated consequences of attentional patterns for strategy, innovation and performance (e.g. Cho and Hambrick, 2006; Eggers and Kaplan, 2009; Eklund and Mannor, 2021; Ocasio and Joseph, 2018), and developed a rich conceptual infrastructure regarding the nature of…”
BackgroundLinguistic cues of chief executive officer personality and its effect on performance
Brunzel, J. (2022) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.3676 · Cited by 10
CEO Implicit Motives: Their Impact on Firm Performance
Veenstra, K. J. (2020) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-19-024 · Cited by 9
“, 2010), and CEO cognition and attention (Eggers and Kaplan, 2009; Marcel, Barr, and Duhame, 2010).”
TMT’s Attention towards Financial Goals and Innovation Investment: Evidence from China
Chen, S.-M., Xu, K., Nguyen, L., & Yu, G.-S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114236 · Cited by 9
“The reports include the mentioning and assessment of past achievements, current challenges, and plans for the future [91] and have been used extensively in top managers studies [12,26,88,92].”
BackgroundRegnér, P. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139681032.018 · Cited by 14
Free Newspapers in the United States: Alive and Kicking
Tennant, J. I. (2014) · The International Journal on Media Management · doi:10.1080/14241277.2014.974244 · Cited by 13
Gebhardt, S., Hou, Y., & Yarime, M. (2026) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2026.105446 · Cited by 8
How CEO digital embeddedness drives firm performance: evidence from the upper echelons theory
Yin, Y., Zhao, L.-W., Li, L.-X., Chen, L.-J., & Li, Y.-N. (2025) · Industrial management & data systems · doi:10.1108/imds-07-2024-0747 · Cited by 8
CEO turnover and innovation: Exploring the advisory role of inventor top management team members
Yoo, S.-H., Kim, D., & Jin, B. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103190 · Cited by 8
Aragón-Correa, J., Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., & Barnett, M. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.4234 · Cited by 8
Huang, C., & Zheng, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813920 · Cited by 10
Market signaling capacity of written and visual charismatic leadership tactics
Fiset, J., Oldford, E., & Chu, S.-E. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100465 · Cited by 8
Crilly, D., & Ioannou, I. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2417987 · Cited by 9
Quantitative methods in Strategy-as-Practice Research
Laamanen, T., Reuter, E., Schimmer, M., Ueberbacher, F., & Guerra, X. W. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139681032.031 · Cited by 8
Capability Interactions and Adaptation to Demand-Side Change
Wang, T., Aggarwal, V. A., & Wu, B. (2019) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3502116 · Cited by 8
Attention and Entrepreneurial Cognition
Shepherd, D., & Patzelt, H. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71782-1_4 · Cited by 8
“2009)), scholars have recently begun focusing on the role managerial attention plays in this context (Eggers and Kaplan 2009; Kaplan 2008; Maula et al. 2013).”
BackgroundPutra, F. H. R., Khanagha, S., Pandza, K., & Suarez, F. F. (2025) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.70040 · Cited by 7
Wang, Y., Ziya, A., Li, M., & Li, G.-R. (2025) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.104291 · Cited by 7
Attention to market expansion: Aspirational antecedent and risk-taking consequence
Gao, R., Zhang, C. M., He, X., & Li, Z. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115322 · Cited by 7
More or the same? Radical, disruptive, discontinuous, and breakthrough innovation
Verhoeven, D., Kovács, A., Marullo, C., Minin, A. D., & Looy, B. V. (2025) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtae045 · Cited by 7
Attention dynamics: Evolution of attention-based view and its implications
Kumar, S., & Thakur, M. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-024-00468-3 · Cited by 7
“…Oca - sio 2012), decision-making (Grimpe et al. 2022; Ocasio et al. 2020), TMT behavior (Zhang et al. 2022a), CEO behavior (Zhang and Bartol 2010), technology adapt - ability (Eggers and Kaplan 2009), innovation (Zhang et al. 2022a ), and corporate governance (Laamanen 2019; Guerrero et al. 2017).”
InfluentialAsking for More Than Answers: Online Shareholder Activism and Corporate Green Innovation
Li, L.-H., Zhang, Y.-X., & Wu, B. (2024) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1017/mor.2024.31 · Cited by 7
“With adequate attention intensity and attention priority (Barreto & Patient, 2013; Eggers & Kaplan, 2009), firms are more likely to introduce green innovation as a substantial response.”
Feng, W., Liu, R., & Chen, H. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123662 · Cited by 9
Hao, X.-J., Hu, F., & Li, Z. (2024) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.038 · Cited by 7
The influence of managerial attributions on corporate entrepreneurship
Jayamohan, P., Moss, T. W., McKelvie, A., & Hyman, M. (2022) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2022.7 · Cited by 6
TMT Cognitive Capability and Organizational Outcomes: A Theoretical Review
Mutinda, N. M., & Kilika, J. (2019) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v12n8p31 · Cited by 7
“Dynamic business environments require high TMT attention capacity to cope with discontinuous changes (Eggers & Kaplan, 2009; Cho & Hambrick, 2006; Tuggle, Schnatterly, & Johnson, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialMitsuhashi, H., & Alcantara, L. L. (2019) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2019.06.001 · Cited by 6
Sense and sensibility: Testing an attention‐based view of organizational responses to social issues
Ferreira, L. C. D. M. (2017) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12156 · Cited by 9
Engler, D. (2015) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtv013 · Cited by 7
Information: The source of entrepreneurial activity
Alvarez, A. M. O., García-Merino, M.-T., & Santos-Álvarez, M.-V. (2015) · doi:10.1177/0539018415580879 · Cited by 7
“Eggers and Kaplan (2009) showed that, in the communications technology industry, managers who paid greater attention to emerging technologies were more likely to correctly and quickly identify the promise that market held, and entered new product markets more quickly.”
Ethically constrained optimization of dynamic capabilities: towards sustainable global health
Ahen, F. (2014) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-04-2012-0080 · Cited by 7
Wang, C., Zhang, X.-E., Tao, Y., & Zhang, K. (2026) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2026.101004 · Cited by 10
“Absorptive capability enables enterprises to effectively integrate valuable external information with internal knowledge, fostering the identification of solutions and the implementation of innovative strategies (Eggers & Kaplan, 2009).”
Su, Z., Zhao, C., Li, Y., & Sun, Z. (2025) · China economic review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102519 · Cited by 7
Zheng, W.-W., Wu, L., & Zhong, X. (2025) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2025.2569035 · Cited by 6
Xiong, X.-L. (2024) · Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S · doi:10.2478/eces-2024-0015 · Cited by 6
Cozzolino, A., & Verona, G. (2024) · Journal of Management and Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-024-09702-2 · Cited by 6
“The vast literature on strategic organizational adaptation and change (Cozzolino & Verona, 2022; Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Eggers & Kaplan, 2009; Lavie & Rosen-kopf, 2006; Teece et al., 1997; Tripsas, 1997; Tushman & O’Reilly, 1996; Zollo & Winter, 2002) is essential to understand how companies…”
Dasí, À., & Kok, G. J. M. (2023) · Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/08276331.2023.2281152 · Cited by 6
“Scholars so far have mostly focused on either the CEO (e.g. Eggers and Kaplan 2009), or the team as one collective (e.g. Beck and Wiersema 2013), without capturing how individual level capabilities combine in the top management team (Salvato and Vassolo 2018).”
CEO cognitive competencies in managing turnaround: Complexity and focus
Liang, X. (2023) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/03128962231168009 · Cited by 6
“Such task environments characterized by increased ambiguity, uncertainty, and time/resource constraints begs for strong cognitive competency of leaders to save declining firms (Eggers and Kaplan, 2009; Liang et al., 2018).”
Learning-by-hiring: How do rival firms learn from focal firm's hiring
Varshney, M. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104664 · Cited by 6
Peng, X.-B., & Wu, J. (2022) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-05-2022-0183 · Cited by 6
Szewczyk, J., Kurzhals, C., Graf-Vlachy, L., Kammerlander, N. H., & König, A. (2022) · The Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100516 · Cited by 6
A problem-solving process for developing capabilities: the case of an established firm
Shu, E. (2019) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-12-2018-0262 · Cited by 6
Alliances to Acquisitions: A Road Map to Advance the Field of Strategic Management
Zakaria, R., & Genc, O. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1479-361x20170000016001 · Cited by 6
Altmann, P. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2397-52102016029 · Cited by 2
Fonti, F., Maoret, M., & Whitbred, R. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-332220150000032005 · Cited by 6
Leading Proactive Punctuated Change
Tushman, M., O'Reilly, C., & Harreld, B. (2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198704072.003.0010 · Cited by 6
“Subscriber: University of Iowa; date: 21 October 2015 is not unique to IBM (see also Amis et al., 2004; Sull and Spinosa, 2007; Eggers and Kaplan, 2009; Gulati and Puranam, 2009; Beer et al., 2011; Battilana and Casciaro, 2012; Groysberg and Slind, 2012; Gawer and Phillips, 2013; Ramarajan et al.,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 461-477
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2141155750
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 30.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- managerial cognition, incumbent firms, technological change, market entry timing, industry orientation, strategic renewal, new product development, management skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review