The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change
Abstract
We investigate the conditions under which managerial cognition affects the timing of incumbent entry into a radical new technological market. We address this question using a longitudinal study of communications technology firms entering the fiber-optics product market. Using a hazard rate model, we investigate the relevance of cognition based on the direction of CEO attention. We find that attention toward the emerging technology and the affected industry is associated with faster entry, and attention to existing technologies is associated with slower progress. Second, we assess the extent to which the effect of cognition is dependent upon the levels of relevant organizational factors and find that CEO attention to the emerging technology may amplify the effects of industry orientation. Managerial cognition is important in understanding organizational outcomes, and considering both the direction of cognition and its interaction with organizational factors provides a more nuanced view of entry behavior. These results contribute to the literatures on incumbent response to technical change and new product development by suggesting that context-specific managerial cognition has a separate and important influence on the degree and direction of strategic renewal. We argue that managerial cognition is therefore a dynamic managerial capability that can shape adaptation by established firms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, fast-paced technological advancements provide late entrants with the possibility of using superior technology to design products that outperform those of early entrants (Eggers and Kaplan 2009).”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Eggers and Kaplan 2009
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426 · cited 2×
“Most attempts to understand dynamic capabilities have operated at the organizational level of analysis ( Eisenhardt and Tabrizi 1995, Hill and Rothaermel 2003), but Adner and Helfat (2003, p. 1012) argued recently that they should be understood at the”
BackgroundCognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131004 · Cited by 1,290
Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants
Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140602 · Cited by 1,058 · cited 1×
“Given the rapidly changing nature of the market and the fact that attention can shift over time (Hambrick et al. 1993), we sought a measure that would capture more directly time-varying attention to issues.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 105
- 10.2307/256674 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0423 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.331 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6451.00136 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0424 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393511 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.9.6.644 · DOI
- 10.2307/3094913 · DOI
- 10.2307/2392616 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393919 · DOI
- Bray R. C., 1997, Hewlett Packard J., 48, 1
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5 · DOI
- 10.2307/3094808 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0145 · DOI
- Caves R. E., 1984, Amer. Econom. Rev., 74, 127
- 10.1002/smj.4250120104 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920639702300101 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1060.0192 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::AID-SMJ804>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.44.12.S207 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.7.2.103 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6451.00067 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1123::AID-SMJ130>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/000282803321455197 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1984.4277657 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.5.2.200 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00061-0 · DOI
- 10.1177/1094428106289252 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- 10.2307/256691 · DOI
- 10.1016/0048-7333(92)90001-K · DOI
- 10.2307/3152066 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0140 · DOI
- 10.2307/2666981 · DOI
- Gilbert R., 1982, Amer. Econom. Rev., 72, 54
- 10.2307/2393985 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199810)19:10<967::AID-SMJ981>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- 10.2307/3440244 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0421 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674038288 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<339::AID-SMJ883>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
- 10.2307/2555761 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250150906 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2003.9416161 · DOI
- Huff A. S., 2000, When Firms Change Direction
- 10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00037-7 · DOI
- Jaffe A. B., 2002, Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, 10.7551/mitpress/5263.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.320 · DOI
- Kaplan S. Framing the future: Cognitive frames, strategic choice and firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. (2004) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School, Cambridge, MA
- 10.5465/amr.2008.33665141 · DOI
- 10.1093/icc/12.2.203 · DOI
- 10.2307/3069433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2392530 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.48.2.171.253 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<997::AID-SMJ134>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.2307/1251866 · DOI
- 10.1177/002194369202900101 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.554 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250090713 · DOI
- Lant T., 2001, Organizational Cognition: Computation and Interpretation
- 10.5465/AMR.2006.19379629 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250090706 · DOI
- 10.1108/eb039016 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00037-1 · DOI
- 10.2307/3069340 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393492 · DOI
- 10.2307/2989896 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299005400403 · DOI
- Nelson R. R., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of the Economic Change
- 10.1002/smj.417 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250090303 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.166 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.7.1.22 · DOI
- Reinganum J. F., 1983, Amer. Econom. Rev., 73, 741
- Roberts C. W., 1997, Text Analysis for the Social Sciences, 275
- 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90046-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.160 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1080.0408 · DOI
- 10.4159/harvard.9780674432864 · DOI
- 10.2307/256224 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00077-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1540-5885.2002004 · DOI
- 10.2307/2392715 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1080.0419 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- 10.2307/2392832 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.42.7.939 · DOI
- 10.1016/0883-9026(86)90004-2 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.3.1.72 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:1+<641::AID-JOB910>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- Wasserman N., Nohria N., Anand B. N. When does leadership matter? The contingent opportunities view of CEO leadership. (2001) . Working Paper 01-063, Harvard Business School, Boston · DOI
- 10.2307/2393593 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0223 · DOI
- Williamson O. E., 1985, Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting
- 10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00017-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2247 · Cited by 2,056
A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research
Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., & Afuah, A. N. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0072 · Cited by 1,587
Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization FieldPreprint
Foss, N. J., Lyles, M. A., & Volberda, H. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1513184 · Cited by 138
Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314561301 · Cited by 1,045
“Eggers and Kaplan (2009) also showed that in the communications technology industry, companies whose CEOs paid greater attention to emerging fiber optic technologies entered new fiber optic–based product markets more quickly.”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda✰
Haefner, N., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Gassmann, O. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120392 · Cited by 1,306
“As in the past, when innovation managers attempt to recognize or develop new opportunities and ideas, they face two specific barriers (Eggers and Kaplan, 2009).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 461-477
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2141155750
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 30.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- managerial cognition, incumbent firms, technological change, market entry timing, industry orientation, strategic renewal, new product development, management skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review