The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation
Abstract
Recent ethnographic studies of workplace practices indicate that the ways people actually work usually differ fundamentally from the ways organizations describe that work in manuals, training programs, organizational charts, and job descriptions. Nevertheless, organizations tend to rely on the latter in their attempts to understand and improve work practice. We examine one such study. We then relate its conclusions to compatible investigations of learning and of innovation to argue that conventional descriptions of jobs mask not only the ways people work, but also significant learning and innovation generated in the informal communities-of-practice in which they work. By reassessing work, learning, and innovation in the context of actual communities and actual practices, we suggest that the connections between these three become apparent. With a unified view of working, learning, and innovating, it should be possible to reconceive of and redesign organizations to improve all three.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 2×
“In short, they are enculturated (Brown, Collins, and Duguid 1989).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Items 101–116 of 116
Islands of Practice: Conflict and a Lack of ‘Community’ in Situated Learning
Macpherson, A., & Clark, B. (2009) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507609340810 · Cited by 49
Guillén, L., & Kunze, F. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21953 · Cited by 44
Llewellyn, S., Procter, R., Harvey, G., Maniatopoulos, G., & Boyd, A. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02230 · Cited by 43
Eliciting conceptual models to support interdisciplinary research
Beers, P. J., & Bots, P. W. G. (2009) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551508099087 · Cited by 36
(2012) · Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1177/1756283x10363751 · Cited by 36
Global, N., & Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025) · doi:10.64357/networking-at-conferences-2025 · Cited by 35
Berlanga, A. J., van Rosmalen, P., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Sloep, P. B. (2012) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00425.x · Cited by 34
(2003) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 33
(2002) · Cited by 30
Mobilizing Knowledge in Frontline Work: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Exploration
Møller, A. M. (2022) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvab023 · Cited by 24
Trust and Community in Open Source Software Production
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2004) · Analyse & Kritik · doi:10.1515/auk-2004-0115 · Cited by 23
The formation of germ cell for organizational learning
Ivaldi, S., & Scaratti, G. (2016) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-01-2016-0004 · Cited by 16
Do We Run How We Say We Run? Formalization and Practice of Governance in OSS Communities
Chakraborti, M., Atkisson, C., Stănciulescu, Ş., Filkov, V., & Frey, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641980 · Cited by 7
(2004) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 5
The importance of ethics in leading an International Baccalaureate School in China
Gibson, C. (2025) · Management in Education · doi:10.1177/08920206241260958 · Cited by 3
Hussain, S. A. (2026) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.70140
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-57
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2150587481
- Cited by
- 8,390
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
