Cited by 1,014Management and Organizational StudiesManagement Theory and PracticeAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introductory Essay—Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis

Weick, Karl E.·1998·Organization Science

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to improve the way we talk about organizational improvisation, using the vehicle of jazz improvisation as the source of orienting ideas. I start with two brief descriptions of the complexity involved when musicians compose in the moment. Then I review several definitions intended to capture holistically what is happening when people improvise. Next, I take a closer look at selected details in improvisation, namely, degrees of improvisation, forms for improvisation, and cognition in improvisation. These understandings are then generalized from jazz to other settings such as conversation, therapy, and relationships of command. I conclude with implications for theory and practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.9.5.543

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degree of divergence from the score in performing organizational routines may vary considerably, from minor adjustments to near total re-invention.

    “As with musical improvisation, the degree of divergence from the score may vary considerably, from minor adjustments to cadence and dynamics to near total re-invention (Weick, 1998).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1037/h0043563 · DOI
  2. Amabile T. M., 1988, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123
  3. 10.1287/orsc.9.5.605 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/10510979209368363 · DOI
  5. Bateson M. C., 1989, Composing a Life
  6. 10.7208/chicago/9780226044521.001.0001 · DOI
  7. Buckley W., 1968, Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, 490
  8. Bursztjahn H., 1981, Medical Choices, Medical Chances
  9. 10.1177/135050849631003 · DOI
  10. 10.1287/orsc.5.4.554 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.5465/amr.1984.4277657 · DOI
  12. Davis F., 1986, In the Moment
  13. 10.1287/orsc.3.2.179 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/009365090017002001 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/256434 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Follett M. P., 1924, Creative Experience
  17. 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90047-D · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gioia T., 1988, The Imperfect Art
  19. Harper D., 1987, Working Knowledge
  20. Isenberg D. J., 1985, Leadership on the Future Battlefield, 168
  21. 10.2307/2390811 · DOI
  22. Keeney B.P., 1990, Improvisational Therapy
  23. Kernfeld B., 1995, What to Listen for in Jazz
  24. Levi-Strauss C., 1966, The Savage Mind
  25. Maggin D. L., 1996, Stan Getz: A Life in Jazz
  26. Mangham I., 1991, The Doing of Managing
  27. Maruyama M., 1963, Amer. Scientist, 51, 164
  28. McDaniel Reuben R., 1996, Handbook of Health Care Management
  29. 10.5465/amr.1993.3997509 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/2393104 · DOI
  31. 10.1017/CBO9780511664014 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60308-1 · DOI
  33. Nonaka I., 1995, The Knowledge-creating Company, 10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/0090-2616(91)90053-C · DOI
  35. Ramos R., 1978, Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 319
  36. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00768.x · DOI
  37. Ryle G., 1979, On Thinking, 121
  38. Schön D. A., 1987, Educating the Reflective Practitioner
  39. Schuller G., 1968, Early Jazz
  40. Simon H. A., 1989, Intuition in Organizations, 23
  41. Stacey R. D., 1992, Managing the Unknowable
  42. Starbuck W. H., 1993, Management Laureates, 3, 65
  43. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00040.x · DOI
  44. Suhor C., 1986, ETC, 43, 133
  45. Sutcliffe K. M., 1996, Handbook of Organizational Behavior
  46. Tyler S. A., 1990, Improvisational Therapy, ix
  47. Weick K. E., 1969, The Social Psychology of Organizing
  48. Weick K. E., 1979, The Social Psychology of Organizing
  49. 10.1080/10510978909368277 · DOI
  50. Weick K. E., 1993, Organization Change and Redesign, 346, 10.1093/oso/9780195072853.003.0011 · DOI
  51. 10.4135/9781452243535.n25 · DOI
  52. Weiss C. H., 1980, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1, 381, 10.1177/107554708000100303 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Wilson R. C., 1992, Manufacturing Systems, 238
  54. 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90023-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weick, K. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Weick, Karl E.
Venue
Organization Science
Published
1998-10
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
543-555
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2045132332
Cited by
1,014
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 48
FWCI
22.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
Keywords
organizational improvisation, jazz improvisation, organizational complexity, conversation, treatment, command relationships, organizational analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review