Cited by 374Child Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Self-reports of potentially traumatic experiences in an adult community sample: gender differences and test-retest stabilities of the items in a brief betrayal trauma survey

Goldberg, Lewis R., Freyd, Jennifer J.·2006·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

A new survey of potentially traumatic events was administered to a large community sample on two occasions, three years apart. In contrast to previous surveys, this one included separate items for events that involve mistreatment by someone close, mistreatment by someone not so close, and non-interpersonal events. For both kinds of interpersonal events, separate items focused on physical, sexual, and emotional types of potential abuse. For each event, respondents indicated the extent of their exposure both prior to and after age 18. This paper reports the prevalence of each of the various kinds of events in subsamples of women (N = 397) and men (N = 292) in both childhood and adulthood, and provides four alternative indices of test-retest stability for each of the event reports. Substantial differences between men and women were found for many of the reported events on both occasions. Specifically, far more women than men reported having experienced traumatic events perpetrated by someone close to them, whereas far more men than women reported having experienced traumatic events perpetrated by someone not close. Some of the implications of these gender interaction effects are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j229v07n03_04

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. DePrince, A.P., & Freyd, J.J. (2002). The intersection of gender and betrayal in trauma. In R. Kimerling, P.C. Oumette, & J. Wolfe (Eds.), Gender and PTSD (pp. 98-113). New York: Guilford.
  2. Williams, L.M. (1994). Recall of childhood trauma: A prospective study of women's memories of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62 , 1167-1176.
  3. Wilson, J.P., & Keane, T.M. (2004). Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD, Second Edition . New York: Guilford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, L. R., & Freyd, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2006-07-19
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
39-63
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W2016820865
Cited by
374
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH49227)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
potentially traumatic events, betrayal trauma, gender differences, test-retest stability, childhood abuse, adult abuse, interpersonal mistreatment, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, prevalence, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Oregon, Surveys and Questionnaires, Violence, Reproducibility of Results, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review