Cited by 40Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

A Quantitative Study on Gender Differences in Disclosing Child Sexual Abuse and Reasons for Nondisclosure

Okur, Pinar, van der Knaap, Leontien M., Bogaerts, Stefan·2020·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Despite the available literature on disclosure of child sexual abuse (CSA), little is known about how gender affects disclosure. This article aims to quantitatively examine whether gender differences exist in formal (to legal or child protection authorities) and informal (to a family member or friend) disclosure of CSA and, if so, to assess whether this relation is associated with abuse characteristics and attitudes toward gender roles. The study also aimed to examine whether gender differences exist in reasons not to disclose CSA. Data of a sample of 586 participants, who reported to have experienced CSA committed by a single person, have been used for the analyses. There were no gender differences for formal disclosure, but the informal disclosure rate of CSA was 2.4 times higher for women than men, and this effect remained significant after controlling for abuse characteristics and attitudes, even though the gender difference decreased slightly. Furthermore, women and men reported different reasons for not disclosing CSA in their personal network. Women were more worried than men that family and friends would discover the abuse and reported more insecurity of what to do in this situation. Professionals in the field of CSA should consider a gender perspective when developing guidelines. Men have rarely been the subject of studies of disclosure after CSA. Professionals should focus more on general mental health outcomes of men that are not related with CSA directly, but where the effects of CSA may exert more indirectly through associations with other problems in life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260517720732

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study on disclosure following child sexual abuse found no gender differences in young adults in reasons against disclosing to formal recipients and only very few gender differences in reasons against disclosing to informal confidants.

    “While quantitative studies on gender differences are still rare, one study on disclosure following CSA found no gender differences in young adults in reasons against disclosing to formal recipients (e.g., police, health care providers) and only very few gender differences in reasons against disclosing to informal confidants (e.g., peers, family members; Okur et al., 2020).”
  • The pattern of gender differences is similar to previous quantitative research on gender differences in reasons for non-disclosure of CSA.

    “With very few exceptions, the present results provided no evidence of gender differences in examined reasons and thus a similar pattern to previous quantitative research on gender differences in reasons for non-disclosure of CSA (Okur et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okur, P., van der Knaap, L. M., & Bogaerts, S.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
  • Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Okur, Pinar
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2017-07-20
Volume
35
Issue
23-24
Pages
5255-5275
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2738366004
Cited by
40
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, disclosure, gender differences, non-disclosure, child protection authorities, gender roles, abuse characteristics, barriers to disclosure
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Male, Self Disclosure, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review