Cited by 16Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Gender differences in response to acceptance and commitment therapy among operation enduring Freedom/Operation iraqi Freedom/Operation new Dawn veterans

Gobin, Robyn L., Strauss, Jennifer L., Golshan, Shahrokh, Allard, Carolyn B., Bomyea, Jessica, Schnurr, Paula P., Lang, Ariel J.·2019·Women s Health Issues

Abstract

Background Most of our knowledge base regarding treatment response among veterans comes from predominantly male samples. Evidence suggests, however, that women and men use different coping strategies, which may impact how effective treatments are for people of different genders. The purpose of this investigation was to examine gender differences in response to acceptance and commitment therapy, an empirically supported transdiagnostic psychotherapy.Methods Data were drawn from a multisite, randomized, controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy as compared with a psychotherapy control, namely, present-centered therapy (PCT), in veterans with emotional distress who served in Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, or New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND). Although the original trial did not find a difference between acceptance and commitment therapy and present-centered therapy, we were interested in examining whether gender differences may have been obscured in the original analyses. This secondary analysis included 117 participants for whom at least one post-baseline data point was available and examined the role of gender in treatment response.Results Gender differences were not observed on the primary outcome of general distress, but were observed in post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms (p < .01).Conclusions These preliminary results suggest the possibility of gender differences in psychotherapy response and should motivate additional study of gender-specific care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2019.03.003

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gobin, R. L., Strauss, J. L., Golshan, S., Allard, C. B., Bomyea, J., Schnurr, P. P., & Lang, A. J.
Affiliations
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Alliant University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Gobin, Robyn L.
Venue
Women s Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
267-273
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2942870077
Cited by
16
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, gender differences, treatment response, post-traumatic stress disorder, Operation Enduring Freedom, Iraq War, Operation New Dawn, military veterans, emotional distress, present-centered therapy, gender-specific care, coping strategies
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Veterans, Treatment Outcome, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review