The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishing Reference Intervals for Clinical Laboratory Test Results: Is There a Better Way?
Open accessAbstract
Reference intervals are essential for clinical laboratory test interpretation and patient care. Methods for estimating them are expensive, difficult to perform, often inaccurate, and nonreproducible. A computerized indirect Hoffmann method was studied for accuracy and reproducibility. The study used data collected retrospectively for 5 analytes without exclusions and filtering from a nationwide chain of clinical reference laboratories in the United States. The accuracy was assessed by the comparability of reference intervals as calculated by the new method with published peer-reviewed studies, and reproducibility was assessed by the comparability of 2 sets of reference intervals derived from 2 different data sets. There was no statistically significant difference between the calculated and published reference intervals or between the 2 sets of intervals that were derived from different data sets. A computerized Hoffmann method for indirect estimation of reference intervals using stored test results is proved to be accurate and reproducible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States
Coresh, J., Selvin, E., Stevens, L. A., Manzi, J., Kusek, J. W., Eggers, P., Van Lente, F., & Levey, A. S. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.17.2038 · Cited by 4,895
Hollowell, J. G., Staehling, N. W., Flanders, W. D., Hannon, W. H., Gunter, E. W., Spencer, C. A., & Braverman, L. E. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.87.2.489 · Cited by 4,279
Surks, M. I., & Hollowell, J. G. (2007) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2007-1499 · Cited by 750
Baskin, H. J., Cobin, R. H., Duick, D. S., Gharib, H., Guttler, R. B., Kaplan, M. M., Segal, R. L., Garber, J. R., Hamilton Jr, C. R., Handelsman, Y., et al. (2002) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/1934-2403-8.6.457 · Cited by 673
American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Detection of Thyroid Dysfunction
Ladenson, P. W., Singer, P. A., Ain, K. B., Bagchi, N., Bigos, S. T., Levy, E. G., Smith, S. A., & Daniels, G. H. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.11.1573 · Cited by 575
(2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2018-0-03395-2 · Cited by 467
Rustad, P., Felding, P., Franzson, L., Kairisto, V., Lahti, A., Mårtensson, A., Petersen, P. H., Simonsson, P., Steensland, H., & Uldall, A. (2004) · Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1080/00365510410006324 · Cited by 404
Statistics in the Practice of Medicine
Hoffmann, R. G. (1963) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1963.03060110068020 · Cited by 353
Ceriotti, F., Boyd, J. C., Klein, G., Henny, J., Queraltó, J., Kairisto, V., Panteghini, M., & the IFCC Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL) (2008) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2007.099648 · Cited by 252
Spencer, C. A., Hollowell, J. G., Kazarosyan, M., & Braverman, L. E. (2007) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0287 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Nikolac, N., Šupak Smolčić, V., Šimundić, A.-M., & Ćelap, I. (2013) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2013.031 · Cited by 99
Reference values for major depression questionnaires: The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study
Schulte-van Maaren, Y. W. M., Carlier, I. V. E., Zitman, F. G., van Hemert, A. M., de Waal, M. W. M., van der Does, A. J. W., van Noorden, M. S., & Giltay, E. J. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.009 · Cited by 62
(2010) · doi:10.1309/ajcpq4n7brzqvhal · Cited by 46
Tozzoli, R., D’Aurizio, F., Metus, P., Steffan, A., Mazzon, C., & Bagnasco, M. (2018) · Journal of Endocrinological Investigation · doi:10.1007/s40618-018-0825-0 · Cited by 29
Reference range for thyrotropin: Post hoc assessment
Giacobino, A., Eckl, W., Wahl, H.-G., Midgley, J. E. M., Hoermann, R., & Larisch, R. (2015) · Nuklearmedizin · doi:10.3413/nukmed-0671-14-06 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Katayev, A., Balciza, C., & Seccombe, D. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-186
- ISSN
- 0002-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7722
- OpenAlex
- W1980432185
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing Reference Intervals for Clinical Laboratory Test Results: Is There a Better Way? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1309/ajcpn5bmtsf1cdyp
- The paper
- Katayev, A., Balciza, C., & Seccombe, D. W. (2010). Establishing Reference Intervals for Clinical Laboratory Test Results: Is There a Better Way? American Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpn5bmtsf1cdyp
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.