Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): A Review Literature Report
Abstract
This report is a review of work published in various journals on the topics of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) between 2005 and 28th May, 2010. A total of 154 articles from 49 journals were reviewed. This report intends to serve two goals. First, it will be useful to researchers who are interested in understanding and following the recent trends in the area of ERP. Finally, this report will be useful to both researchers and businesses or industries; because it seeks to highlight the current unanswered but justified research and development (R&D) questions raised in research papers for research and/or development needs. The report is summarized to identify key references in the form of literature reviews; thus, identifying key journals and other key forums such as conferences and societies in the field of ERP. The summary will also identify most cited authors by using a sample statistical report from Harzing’s Publish or Perish software. This report will also seek to address the issues and trends, including future trends of the ERP System Life Cycle (SLC) into six\nmajor and sub phases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Review of literature by Moon [22] and Addo-Tenkorang and Helo [1] mention that one of the most cited critical success factors in ERP implementation is user participation and involvement.
“Review of literature conducted by Moon [22] and Addo-Tenkorang and Helo [1] mention that one of the most cited critical success factors in the implementation of ERP systems is user participation and involvement.”
From Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation (2013) · cites this paper as Addo-Tenkorang and Helo [1]
Cites
Factors affecting ERP system adoption: A comparative analysis between SMEs and large companies
Buonanno, G., Faverio, P., Pigni, F., Ravarini, A., Sciuto, D., & Tagliavini, M. (2005) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410390510609572 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): a review of the literature
Moon, Y. B. (2007) · International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1504/ijmed.2007.012679 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
An investigation into the use of ERP systems in the service sector
Botta-Genoulaz, V., & Millet, P.-A. (2006) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.12.015 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.005 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
A framework for addressing the organisational issues of enterprise systems implementation
Ward, J., Hemingway, C., & Daniel, E. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.04.005 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
ERP integration in a healthcare environment: a case study
Stefanou, C. J., & Revanoglou, A. (2006) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410390610636913 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rajan, C. A., & Baral, R. (2015) · IIMB Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.iimb.2015.04.008 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation
Matende, S., & Ogao, P. (2013) · Procedia Technology · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.058 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Assessing the impact of enterprise resource planning on decision-making quality: An empirical study
Ouiddad, A., Okar, C., Chroqui, R., & Beqqali Hassani, I. (2021) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-04-2019-0273 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Addo-Tenkorang, R., & Helo, P.
- Venue
- Unpublished
- Publisher
- Unpublished
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W2472106365
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Enterprise Management and Information Systems
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, most cited authors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
