Cited by 204ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourCorporate Governance and Management

Measuring ERP success: The key-users’ viewpoint of the ERP to produce a viable IS in the organization

Wu, Jen-Her, Wang, Yu-Min·2007·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.005

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After successful implementation the user usually becomes dependent on the ERP vendor for assistance and updates.

    “After the successful implementation the user usually becomes dependent on the ERP vendor for assistance and updates (Somers and Nelson [26]; Wu and Wang [30]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M.
Affiliations
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
  • National Chi Nan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Wu, Jen-Her
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
1582-1596
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020303288
Cited by
203
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
FWCI
16.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
Keywords
enterprise resource planning, ERP success, user satisfaction, key users, small and medium-sized enterprises, questionnaire development, reliability and validity, business process integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review