The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teachers’ and pupils’ definitions of bullying.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comparison of teachers' and pupils' definitions of bullying is important for considering the implications for reports of its incidence in schools, for the study of developmental trends in children's and adolescents' perceptions of the phenomenon and for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions designed to combat bullying. AIMS: To investigate the effects of gender, teacher/pupil status and, for pupils, bullied/non-bullied (target/non-target) status and age on the definition of bullying. SAMPLES: Teachers (N=225: 158 women, 67 men) and pupils (N=1,820: 466 boys, 460 girls were 11-12 years old, year 7, and 415 boys, 479 girls were 13-14 years, year 9) in 51 UK secondary schools participated in a questionnaire survey. A total of 557 of the pupils (117 girls and 117 boys aged 11-12 years, and 197 girls and 126 boys aged 13-14 years) reported that they had been bullied at some time in their present school. METHODS: Written questionnaire responses to the question, 'Say what you think bullying is' have been content analysed to derive two sets of categories, one of bullying behaviour and the other of effects of bullying on the target. RESULTS: Regarding both bullying behaviour and the effects of bullying on the target, teachers - by comparison with pupils - have been found to express more comprehensive ideas in their definitions. Specifically, pupils compared with teachers are more likely to restrict their definitions to direct bullying (verbal and/or physical abuse) and are less likely to refer to social exclusion, a power imbalance in the bully's favour and the bully's intention to cause the target hurt or harm and to feel threatened. Analysis of definitions on the bases of sex, pupil age and target/non-target status show that: targets are more likely than non-targets are to refer to the bully's physically and verbally abusive behaviour, and for Year 7 compared with Year 9 pupils, to suggest that bullies socially exclude targets; girls are more likely than boys are to mention verbal abuse and the effects on the target of 'Feels hurt/harm', but boys are more likely than girls are to construe bullying as involving repetition; older pupils are more likely than younger ones are to refer to a power imbalance in the bully's favour but, for bully targets, younger ones compared with older ones are more likely to invoke the idea of social exclusion in their definitions. CONCLUSIONS: The most important implication of the findings of this study that there are important differences between teachers' and pupils' definitions of bullying is that teachers need to listen carefully to what pupils have to say about bullying and work with and help them to develop their conceptions of the phenomenon. Some teachers, too, need to develop their conceptions of bullying.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“while harm inflicted on victims is a salient feature in their definition of bullying (Madsen, 1996; Naylor et al., 2006).”
From The representation of bullying in Italian primary school children: A mixed-method study comparing drawing and interview data and their association with self-report involvement in bullying events (2022) · cites this paper as Naylor et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“young children tend to differentiate only between non-aggressive and aggressive acts, viewing the latter as bullying even when they do not involve bullying behavior (e.g., children of equal power fighting over a misunderstanding)”
From The representation of bullying in Italian primary school children: A mixed-method study comparing drawing and interview data and their association with self-report involvement in bullying events (2022) · cites this paper as Naylor et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“males are more likely to describe observable behaviors that may occur in bullying incidents”
From The representation of bullying in Italian primary school children: A mixed-method study comparing drawing and interview data and their association with self-report involvement in bullying events (2022) · cites this paper as Naylor et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“children are more likely to refer to direct victimization (physical and verbal) compared to their teachers, who in turn tend to refer also to indirect forms of bullying (e.g., social exclusion; Naylor et al., 2006).”
From The representation of bullying in Italian primary school children: A mixed-method study comparing drawing and interview data and their association with self-report involvement in bullying events (2022) · cites this paper as Naylor et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“females’ representations of bullying appear to focus more on the impact of bullying and the emotional well-being of the victims”
From The representation of bullying in Italian primary school children: A mixed-method study comparing drawing and interview data and their association with self-report involvement in bullying events (2022) · cites this paper as Naylor et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“in turn adolescents and adults have a more complex understanding of bullying, successfully distinguishing between direct and indirect forms of physical, relational/social, and verbal bullying behaviors”
From The representation of bullying in Italian primary school children: A mixed-method study comparing drawing and interview data and their association with self-report involvement in bullying events (2022) · cites this paper as Naylor et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Some data show that females tend to report more verbal abuse than males (Naylor et al., 2006).”
From The representation of bullying in Italian primary school children: A mixed-method study comparing drawing and interview data and their association with self-report involvement in bullying events (2022) · cites this paper as Naylor et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Relational Aggression, Gender, and Social-Psychological Adjustment
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x · Cited by 3,954
The Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression
Rubin, K. H., & Pepler, D. J. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203771693 · Cited by 2,747
An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis
Musiol, G. (1997) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0167-9473(97)84760-3 · Cited by 1,981
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Plewis, I., & Fleiss, J. L. (1982) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2982107 · Cited by 1,753
A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools
Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/0013188930350101 · Cited by 1,331
Relational and overt aggression in preschool.
Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Mosher, M. (1997) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.33.4.579 · Cited by 883
A developmental investigation of social aggression among children.
Galen, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1997) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.33.4.589 · Cited by 838
BULLY/VICTIM PROBLEMS AMONG MIDDLE SCHOOL CHILDREN
Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01000.x · Cited by 809
Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. F., Liefooghe, A. P. D., Almeida, A., Araki, H., del Barrio, C., Costabile, A., Dekleva, B., Houndoumadi, A., et al. (2002) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00461 · Cited by 791
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Ahmad Y., 1990, Behavioural measures: Bullying in schools, Newsletter of the Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 26
- Arora T., 1987, Defining bullying for a secondary school, Education and Child Psychology, 4, 110
- Cowie H., 1994, Tackling bullying in your school: A practical guide for teachers, 41
- Crick N. R., 1996, Children's treatment by peers: Targets of relational and overt aggression, Development and Psychopathology, 8, 673
- Department for Education & Employment (DfEE)., 2001, Bullying: Don't suffer in silence
- Heald T. R., 1994, Judgement in the case between R.H. Walker and Derbyshire county council
- Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO), 1989, The Children Act
- HM Government, 2004, Children Act 2004
- Kinnear P. R., 2004, SPSS 12 made simple
- Lane D. A., 1989, Bullying in school, 95
- Lo‐Feudo G., 2003, Riconoscimento e definizione verbale dei comportamenti inerenti al bullying: Uno studio compartivo su due campioni di bambini de 8 e 14 anni [Recognising and verbal defining bullying behaviour: A comparative study on 8 and 14 year old children], Eta-evolutiva, 41, 60
- Madsen K. C., 1996, Differing perceptions of bullying and their practical implications, Education and Child Psychology, 13, 14
- Menisini E., 2003, La definizione del bullismo: Aluni e insegnanti a confronto [Pupils' and teachers' definition of bullying], Eta-evolutiva, 74, 68
- Naylor P., 2005, Longitudinal trial of the impact of a mental health programme on adolescents in Greater
- Olweus D., 1993, Bullying: What we know and what we can do
- Olweus D., 1999, The nature of school bullying: A cross‐national perspective, 7
- Tattum D. P., 1989, Bullying in school, 7
- The Samaritans, 2000, Young men speak
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Felix, E. D., Sharkey, J. D., Green, J. G., Furlong, M. J., & Tanigawa, D. (2011) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20389 · Cited by 253
“Considerable effort has been devoted to developing a consensus on how to define and measure bullying [e.g., Arora, 1996; Naylor et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2002].”
BackgroundPerceptions and correlates of peer‐victimization and bullying
Hunter, S. C., Boyle, J. M. E., & Warden, D. (2006) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709906x171046 · Cited by 199
Boulton, M. J., Smith, P. K., & Cowie, H. (2010) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034310362329 · Cited by 194
“…recognized as relatively common features of the kindergarten and preschool years (Kochenderfer and Ladd, 1996; Monks et al., 2003), middle childhood (Boulton and underwood, 1992; Perry et al., 1988; Whitney and Smith, 1993) as well as adolescence (Boulton and Flemington, 1996; Naylor et al., 2006).”
BackgroundFaris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414524573 · Cited by 200
“However, much prior research uses the term “bully” in survey questions, which youths tend to associate more strongly with overt physical and verbal abuse, as opposed to more subtle forms of aggression (Boulton 1997; Naylor et al. 2006; Smith et al. 2002; Smith and Madsen 1999).”
BackgroundMethodPromoting Mental Health Literacy Among Educators
Whitley, J., Smith, J. D., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013) · Canadian Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1177/0829573512468852 · Cited by 172
Salmon, S., Turner, S. E., Taillieu, T., Fortier, J., & Afifi, T. O. (2017) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.12.005 · Cited by 168
Lund, E. M., & Ross, S. W. (2016) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838015620818 · Cited by 167
Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of Bullying in School Settings
Carrera, M. V., DePalma, R., & Fernández, M. L. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9171-x · Cited by 155
“recent study by Naylor et al. (2006) found that teachers had a more comprehensive”
BackgroundTelling is compelling: the impact of student reports of bullying on teacher intervention
Novick, R. M., & Isaacs, J. (2010) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410903573123 · Cited by 128
“Given that teachers’ definition of bullying impacts their response to it (Naylor et al., 2006), it is possible that teachers in the current study reported less response to observed bullying because they defined the behaviours they observed as normative or something other than bullying.”
BackgroundMaunder, R., Harrop, A., & Tattersall, A. J. (2010) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2010.504062 · Cited by 123
“1993), and research with secondary school pupils and teachers suggests that they do not always include differential power between bully and victim or the intention to cause harm (Naylor et al. 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialHow do secondary school students explain bullying?
Thornberg, R., & Delby, H. (2019) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2019.1600376 · Cited by 115
“…but also among teachers and policymakers (Chalmers et al. 2016; Craig, Bell, and Leschied 2011; Erling and Hwang 2004; Eriksen 2018; Frisén, Holmqvist, and Oscarsson 2008; Guerin and Hennessey 2002; Hellström, Persson, and Hagquist 2015; Naylor et al. 2006; Purcell 2012; Vaillancourt et al. 2008).”
BackgroundSchool bullying as a creator of pupil peer pressure
Hamarus, P., & Kaikkonen, P. (2008) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131880802499779 · Cited by 111
Rønning, J. A., Sourander, A., Kumpulainen, K., Tamminen, T., Niemelä, S., Moilanen, I. K., Helenius, H. Y. M., Piha, J., & Almqvist, F. (2008) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-008-0395-0 · Cited by 107
“Likewise, many teachers tend to exclude many indirect forms of bullying, such as spreading rumours, intimidations and social exclusion [22].”
BackgroundInfluentialSchool bullying from a sociocultural perspective
Maunder, R., & Crafter, S. (2017) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.010 · Cited by 136
Profiles of internalizing and externalizing symptoms associated with bullying victimization
Eastman, M. L., Foshee, V. A., Ennett, S. T., Sotres‐Alvarez, D., Reyes, H. L. M., Faris, R., & North, K. E. (2018) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.007 · Cited by 94
Teacher, parent and student perceptions of the motives of cyberbullies
Compton, L., Campbell, M. A., & Mergler, A. (2014) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9254-x · Cited by 109
Repetition, Power Imbalance, and Intentionality
Gordillo, I. C. (2011) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260511431436 · Cited by 87
“Other studies found the proportion of teenagers who apply the criterion of intent to hurt to classify aggressive behavior as bullying to be 1.7% (Vaillancourt et al., 2008), 3.9% (Naylor et al., 2006), 5% (Madsen, 1996), or 13% (Guerin & Hennessey, 2002).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDefinitions of school bullying in Taiwan: A comparison of multiple perspectives
Cheng, Y., Chen, L., Ho, H.-C., & Cheng, C.-L. (2011) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034311404130 · Cited by 82
“We employed the single open-ended question, which has been used frequently in recent studies (Monks & Smith, 2006; Naylor et al., 2006; Vaillancourt et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTEACHERS' ATTITUDES TOWARD DIFFERENT TYPES OF BULLYING AND VICTIMIZATION IN TURKEY
Duy, B. (2013) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.21729 · Cited by 76
Dimensions of empathy and bystander intervention in bullying in elementary school
Fredrick, S. S., Jenkins, L. N., & Ray, K. (2020) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2020.03.001 · Cited by 75
Brank, E. M., Hoetger, L. A., & Hazen, K. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173820 · Cited by 74
Understanding and defining bullying – adolescents’ own views
Hellström, L., Persson, L. J. P., & Hagquist, C. (2015) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/2049-3258-73-4 · Cited by 77
“Based on the results in the current study, and in line with suggestions by other researchers [17,19], the estimation of bullying prevalence rates need to take children’s perspectives into consideration.”
BackgroundResultFitton, D., & Read, J. C. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3311927.3323136 · Cited by 73
“…30 minutes each a ft er loading) it quickly became apparent that both these apps align with Inappropriate:Encouraging Anti-Social Behavior as they appeared to actively demonstrate and encourage bullying through indirect aggression [29] (such as a tt acks on social standing and social exclusion).”
BackgroundSeehra, J., Newton, T., & DiBiase, A. T. (2011) · BDJ · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.339 · Cited by 65
Esthetic dental anomalies as motive for bullying in schoolchildren
Scheffel, D. L. S., Jeremias, F., Fragelli, C. M. B., dos Santos-Pinto, L. A. M., Hebling, J., & de Oliveira, O. B. (2014) · European Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.4103/1305-7456.126266 · Cited by 63
“[27,28] The prevalence of indirect aggression is possibly underestimated due to the failure of both individuals and teachers to recognize it as a form of bullying.[29] In the”
Subjective Well-Being of Bullied Children in Indonesia
Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2019) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-019-09778-1 · Cited by 78
“In line with the statement by Monks et al. (2009), a study which had been conducted by Naylor et al. (2006) showed that only 9% of pupils and 17.8% of teachers included repetition in their definition of bullying when they were requested to define bullying in an open-ended questionnaire.”
ResultInfluentialLee, E. (2009) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025408098028 · Cited by 73
“According to Naylor et al. (2006), there are gender differences in the way in which bullying is conceptualized.”
BackgroundKofoed, J., & Staksrud, E. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818810026 · Cited by 61
Concepts of bullying: Developmental and cultural aspects
Smith, P. K., & Monks, C. P. (2008) · International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health · doi:10.1515/ijamh.2008.20.2.101 · Cited by 60
“For instances of this approach, see (11,12).”
Resident-to-resident relational aggression and subjective well-being in assisted living facilities
Trompetter, H. R., Scholte, R. H. J., & Westerhof, G. J. (2010) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2010.501059 · Cited by 57
“Residents and nurses may apply different definitions of relational aggression and negativity, as has been found in children and teachers (Naylor, Cowie, Cossin, de Bettencourt, & Lemme, 2006 ).”
BackgroundHoulston, C., & Smith, P. K. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709908x293878 · Cited by 56
Cascardi, M. A., Brown, C., Iannarone, M., & Cardona, N. (2013) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220.2013.846861 · Cited by 55
Improving the School Context of Early Adolescence Through Teacher Attunement to Victimization
Norwalk, K. E., Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., & Barnes, K. L. (2015) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431615590230 · Cited by 62
Cyberbullying: Definition, consequences, prevalence
Campbell, M. A., & Bauman, S. A. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811423-0.00001-8 · Cited by 55
Teacher and Administrator Perceptions of Bullying in Schools
Kennedy, T. D., Russom, A. G., & Kevorkian, M. M. (2012) · International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership · doi:10.22230/ijepl.2012v7n5a395 · Cited by 54
Teachers’ and parents’ understanding of traditional and cyberbullying
Campbell, M. A., Whiteford, C., & Hooijer, J. (2018) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220.2018.1507826 · Cited by 54
Bullying, Social Power and Heteronormativity: Girls’ Constructions of Popularity
Duncan, N., & Owens, L. W. (2011) · Children & Society · doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00378.x · Cited by 51
Raufelder, D., & Kulakow, S. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12438 · Cited by 63
“As a Parent You Become a Tiger”: Parents Talking about Bullying at School
Hale, R., Fox, C. L., & Murray, M. (2017) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-017-0710-z · Cited by 59
“Additionally, evidence suggests that complaints of physical and verbal bullying are likely to be taken more seriously than relational bullying because teachers do not always view social exclusion as a form of bullying behaviour (Naylor et al. 2006; Yoon et al. 2016).”
BackgroundRajendran, K., Kruszewski, E., & Halperin, J. M. (2015) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12433 · Cited by 55
A systematic review of bullying definitions: how definition and format affect study outcome
Younan, B. (2018) · Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research · doi:10.1108/jacpr-02-2018-0347 · Cited by 48
Issues in the assessment of bullying: Implications for conceptualizations and future directions
Jia, M., & Mikami, A. Y. (2018) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.004 · Cited by 47
Defining the word bullying: Inconsistencies and lack of clarity among current definitions
Slattery, L., George, H. P., & Kern, L. (2019) · Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth · doi:10.1080/1045988x.2019.1579164 · Cited by 45
“Students are also more likely to specifically focus on direct forms of aggression (i.e., physical or verbal) and include a wide range of behavior and levels of severity within their descriptions of bullying (e.g., Naylor et al., 2006; Oliver & Candappa, 2003).”
BackgroundDefining Cyberbullying: a Multifaceted Definition Based on the Perspectives of Emerging Adults
Alipan, A., Skues, J. L., Theiler, S., & Wise, L. (2020) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-019-00018-6 · Cited by 44
“It should also be noted that similar issues also remain unresolved in the traditional bullying literature, with past research reporting a discrepancy in how students, teachers, parents, and researchers define bullying (Campbell et al. 2018; Demaray et al. 2013; Maunder et al. 2010; Naylor et al. 2006; Sawyer et al. 20…”
BackgroundResultRomera, E. M., Rey, R. D., & Ruiz, R. O. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 44
Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Bullying: A Systematic Review
Dawes, M., Gariton, C. E., Starrett, A., Irdam, G., & Irvin, M. J. (2022) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543221094081 · Cited by 54
“It is important to note that this phenomenon is not limited to preservice teachers: Some in-service teachers likewise struggle to define bullying in terms of its hallmarks (Naylor et al., 2006).”
Backgroundvan Aalst, D. A. E., Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2022) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-022-00145-7 · Cited by 43
Traditional Versus Internet Bullying in Junior High School Students
Gofin, R., & Avitzour, M. (2012) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-012-0989-8 · Cited by 42
The power of the word: students’ and school staff’s use of the established bullying definition.
Eriksen, I. M. (2018) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2018.1454263 · Cited by 40
“Several studies have found that teachers experience difficulties in applying the definition of bullying (Ellwood and Davies 2010; Migliaccio 2015; Naylor et al. 2006) and that they spend much time and effort on determining whether an incident is bullying (Allen 2015).”
BackgroundThe Role of School Context in Implementing a Statewide Anti-Bullying Policy and Protecting Students
Hall, W. J., & Chapman, M. V. (2016) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/0895904816637689 · Cited by 52
“…(e.g., students, teachers, and parents), and scholars (Arora, 1996; Cheng, Chen, Ho, & Cheng, 2011; Cuadrado-Gordillo, 2012; Guerin & Hennessy, 2002; Mishna, 2004; Monks & Smith, 2006; Naylor, Cowie, Cossin, de Bettencourt, & Lemme, 2006; P. K. Smith et al., 2002; Vaillancourt et al., 2008).”
Rotten apple or rotten barrel? Social identity and children's responses to bullying
Jones, S. E., Haslam, S. A., York, L., & Ryan, M. K. (2007) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151007x200385 · Cited by 38
Bullying and School Climate from the Aspects of the Students and Teachers
Kartal, H., & Bilgin, A. (2009) · Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS · Cited by 36
Moving beyond the Emphasis on Bullying: A Generalized Approach to Peer Aggression in High School
Donoghue, C., & Raia‐Hawrylak, A. (2015) · Children & Schools · doi:10.1093/cs/cdv042 · Cited by 35
Understanding bullying from young people’s perspectives: An exploratory study
Hellström, L., & Lundberg, A. (2020) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2020.1821388 · Cited by 35
“Although this direction can be helpful in focusing the student on the task, it risks limiting young people’s expressions of what might really be troubling them at school, thus restricting their thinking about bullying to a narrow set of phenomena (Naylor et al. 2006; Duncan and Owens 2011).”
BackgroundNewgent, R. A., Lounsbery, K. L., Keller, E. A., Baker, C. R., Cavell, T. A., & Boughfman, E. M. (2009) · Journal of school counseling · Cited by 34
Söderberg, P., & Björkqvist, K. (2019) · Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926771.2019.1570410 · Cited by 32
Teacher Engagement with Bullying: Managing an Identity within a School
Migliaccio, T. A. (2014) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.2014.978430 · Cited by 41
“While teachers have greater comprehension of what constitutes bullying (Greene 2000; Menesini, Fonzi, and Smith 2002; Naylor et al. 2006), research indicates that they are aware of only one-third of all bullying that occurs (Leff et al. 1999; Pellegrini and Bartini 2001).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAdolescents’ definitions of bullying: The contribution of age, gender, and experience of bullying.
Byrne, H., Dooley, B., Fitzgerald, A., & Dolphin, L. (2016) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0271-8 · Cited by 31
“As previous literature has already shown that adolescents’ definitions do not frequently contain key elements of research definitions of bullying (Cuadrado-Gordillo 2012; Frisén et al. 2008; Guerin and Hennessy 2002; Naylor et al. 2006; Vaillancourt et al. 2008), this study will not attempt to examine themes of repeti…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialO’Brien, S. O., Campbell, M. A., & Whiteford, C. (2023) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220.2023.2289117 · Cited by 41
“Research has shown that teachers’ articulation of the meaning of bullying is different from researchers’ definitions (Bauman & Del Rio, 2005; Naylor et al., 2006) with many teachers mentioning only two of the three fundamental characteristics of bullying (Lee, 2006).”
BackgroundAllen, K. P. (2015) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911359.2014.893857 · Cited by 37
Whitley, J., Smith, J. D., Vaillancourt, T., & Neufeld, J. (2018) · Plenum series on human exceptionality · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89842-1_9 · Cited by 29
Wurf, G. (2012) · Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling · doi:10.1017/jgc.2012.2 · Cited by 29
Garrett, L. (2018) · Aigne Journal · doi:10.33178/aigne.vol5.5 · Cited by 29
“A limited number of studies have also directly compared teachers’ and students’ perceptions of bullying (Menesini et al., 2003; Naylor et al., 2006).”
BackgroundBullying among adolescents: The role of skills
Sarzosa, M., & Urzúa, S. (2021) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe1215 · Cited by 29
“Psychological research shows that children tend to restrict their definitions of bullying to verbal and/or physical abuse [Naylor et al., 2010].”
BackgroundThe Impact of Cyberbullying and Cyber Harassment on Academic Achievement
Egeberg, G. C., Thorvaldsen, S., & Rønning, J. A. (2016) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-648-4_11 · Cited by 28
“Furthermore, from research on traditional bullying, we have learned that students perceive bullying differently from teachers (Stockdale et al., 2002, Naylor et al., 2006), and that younger children tend to include a wider range of negative conduct than their older peers (Frisen et al., 2008).”
BackgroundBullying in schools: What is the problem, and how can educators solve it?
Strohmeier, D., & Noam, G. G. (2012) · New Directions for Youth Development · doi:10.1002/yd.20003 · Cited by 33
Bullying in New Zealand Schools: A Final Report
Green, V. A., Harcourt, S., Mattioni, L., & Prior, T. (2013) · Cited by 25
Jeffrey, J., & Stuart, J. (2019) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-019-00026-6 · Cited by 24
“…have explored the issues around defining and measuring both traditional and cyberbullying (Frisén et al. 2008; Hellström et al. 2015; Langos 2012; Naylor et al. 2006; Vaillancourt et al. 2008), further research remains important as inconsistencies may lead to errors in documenting prevalence…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMorabito, D. M., Burani, K., & Hajcak, G. (2021) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-020-01100-7 · Cited by 25
On the Front Lines: Educating Teachers about Bullying and Prevention Methods
Glasner (2010) · Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.3844/jssp.2010.537.541 · Cited by 23
Gordillo, I. C. (2011) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.002 · Cited by 23
Bullying affects: the affective violence and moral orders of school bullying
Lohmeyer, B. A., & Threadgold, S. (2023) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508487.2023.2193421 · Cited by 22
“…and clarifications to Olweus’ emphasis on intention to harm (Sercombe & Donnelly, 2013), power imbalance (Horton, 2020; Jacobson, 2007) and repetition (Ey et al., 2019; Maunder & Crafter, 2018; Naylor et al., 2006), including claims that it lacks a sufficient evidence base (Volk et al., 2014).”
BackgroundÖğretmenlerin Akran Zorbalığına İlişkin Görüşleri ve Zorbalıkla Baş Etme Stratejileri
Akyol, N. A., YILDIZ, C., & Akman, B. (2017) · Hacettepe University Journal of Education · doi:10.16986/huje.2017032926 · Cited by 22
Muluk, S., Habiburrahim, H., Dahliana, S., & Akmal, S. (2021) · Englisia Journal of language education and humanities · doi:10.22373/ej.v8i2.8996 · Cited by 30
Australian Early Childhood Teachers’ Understanding of Bullying
Ey, L.-A., & Campbell, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211006355 · Cited by 20
“, 2005) or only by a minority of teachers when defining bullying (Naylor et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMultiple perspectives on the targets and causes of school bullying
Wong, C.-T., Cheng, Y., & Chen, L. (2013) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2013.837030 · Cited by 20
Peter, C. R., Tasker, T. B., & Horn, S. S. (2016) · Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity · doi:10.1037/sgd0000199 · Cited by 20
Understanding and preventing bullying and sexual harassment in school.
Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13274-016 · Cited by 19
Victimization and bullying among 8-year-old Finnish children
Santalahti, P., Sourander, A., Aromaa, M. E., Helenius, H. Y. M., Ikäheimo, K., & Piha, J. (2008) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-008-0688-6 · Cited by 19
“In the recent study of Naylor and colleagues [ 25 ] it was found that there are important differences between teachers’ and pupils’ definitions of bullying, with teachers expressing more comprehensive ideas in their definitions, including not only direct bullying but, for example, also social exclusion and a power imb…”
BackgroundBullying. Description of the roles of victim, bully, peer group, school, family and society.
Canales, M. U., Oidor, C. A., Baena, V. S., & Ruíz, E. D. J. (2018) · International Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.17583/rise.2018.3547 · Cited by 19
“A survey of teachers and students in the United Kingdom indicates that both, when defining bullying, refer to the victim as a person who is physically and psychologically harmed, and who suffers fear because he is continually intimidated (Naylor, 2006).”
BackgroundTeachers’ Awareness and Sensitivity to a Bullying Incident: A Qualitative Study
Paljakka, A. (2023) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-023-00185-7 · Cited by 27
“In a qualitative study by Naylor et al. (2006), for example, around 70% of the teachers invoked abuse of power as being a criterion of bullying.”
How students with autism spectrum conditions understand traditional bullying and cyberbullying
Hwang, Y., Dillon-Wallace, J. A., Campbell, M. A., Ashburner, J. K., Saggers, B. R., Carrington, S. B., & Hand, K. (2017) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1370736 · Cited by 20
“In addition, younger children compared with older ones (Naylor et al. 2006), and students compared with teachers (Vaillancourt et al. 2008), were more likely to restrict their understanding of bullying to direct bullying (e.g. physical abuse) rather than indirect bullying (e.g. social exclusion).”
BackgroundResultBullying among Adolescents: The Role of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Skills
Sarzosa, M., & Urzúa, S. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21631 · Cited by 19
Students' Perceptions of Bullying in Oklahoma Public Schools
Hughes, P. P., Middleton, K. M., & Marshall, D. D. (2009) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220902910656 · Cited by 17
“Additionally, students tend not to define social bullying in their operational definitions of bullying ( Naylor, Cowei, Cossin, de Bettencourt, & Lemme, 2006 ), so most of social bullying goes unchallenged.”
BackgroundTwo sides to the story: Adolescent and parent views on harmful intention in defining school bullying
Thomas, H. J., Connor, J. P., Baguley, C. M., & Scott, J. G. (2016) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21694 · Cited by 17
“…definition of bullying are evident in adolescent perceptions of bullying, references to harmful intention are less frequently identified in spontaneous descriptions (Byrne et al., 2016; Fris en et al., 2008; Guerin & Hennessey, 2002; Madsen, 1996; Naylor et al., 2006; Vaillancourt et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialTeachers’ Attitudes Toward Bullying
Mazzone, A., Kollerová, L., & Norman, J. O. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118482650.ch8 · Cited by 20
Creencias de docentes acerca del bullying
Valdés‐Cuervo, A. A., Nénninger, E. H. E., & Valenzuela, A. M. (2014) · Perfiles Educativos · doi:10.1016/s0185-2698(14)70637-3 · Cited by 16
Experiences Versus Perceptions: Do Students Agree That They Have Been Bullied?
Connell, N. M., Schell-Busey, N. M., & Hernández, R. (2018) · Youth & Society · doi:10.1177/0044118x18792437 · Cited by 19
“Generally, findings suggest that older students have more sophisticated definitions of bullying, recognizing the common themes of bullying such as repetition and power imbalances (Monks & Smith, 2006; Naylor et al., 2006).”
InfluentialRomera, E. M., Rodríguez-Barbero, S., & Ruiz, R. O. (2015) · Culture and Education · doi:10.1080/11356405.2015.1006850 · Cited by 16
Bullying Acoso EscolarPreprint
Urra, M. (2017) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/fxsy3 · Cited by 16
Fry, D. A., Mackay, K. M., Childers-Buschle, K. E., Wazny, K., & Bahou, L. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102988 · Cited by 15
Do teachers really underestimate the prevalence of bullying in schools?
Rigby, K. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09564-0 · Cited by 14
Wie zuverlässig sind Selbsteinschätzungen von Schülern zum Vorkommen von Bullying?
Hautzinger, M., Morbitzer, P., & Spröber, N. (2009) · Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie · doi:10.13109/prkk.2009.58.2.81 · Cited by 14
Chen, L., Sung, Y., & Cheng, W. (2017) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-017-0354-1 · Cited by 13
Kartal, H. (2009) · Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/09718923.2009.11892729 · Cited by 13
“The possible reasons for participants’ tendency to tell about the bullying mainly to their friends and family can be related to the teachers’ opinions about bullying (Naylor et al. 2006) and to the fact that the students think that teachers’ efforts to deal with bullying are insufficient.”
Bruening, R., Orengo‐Aguayo, R., Onwuachi-Willig, A., & Ramirez, M. R. (2017) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220.2017.1322517 · Cited by 13
Marengo, D., Settanni, M., Longobardi, C., & Fabris, M. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862711 · Cited by 12
“, physical and verbal aggression) when compared to students who had not been involved in bullying (Naylor et al., 2006).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPillay, J. (2021) · South African Journal of Childhood Education · doi:10.4102/sajce.v11i1.956 · Cited by 18
“Learners are more likely to define bullying as physical and verbal abuse whilst teachers include social exclusion, power imbalances, and threats to hurt others (Naylor et al. 2006).”
BackgroundForsberg, C. (2022) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-022-00132-y · Cited by 12
“Previous literature shows how pupils’ definitions and understandings of bullying might be different compared to adults (Naylor et al., 2006).”
BackgroundChung, K. L., & Charles, K. E. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.059 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Naylor, P., Cowie, H., Cossin, F., de Bettencourt, R., & Lemme, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Naylor, Paul
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 553-576
- ISSN
- 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8279
- OpenAlex
- W1980316240
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- bullying, definition of bullying, teacher perceptions, student perceptions, social exclusion, power imbalance, gender differences, age differences, bullying victims, bullying intervention, high school students, verbal abuse, physical abuse
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Child, Faculty, Female, Humans, Male, Terminology as Topic, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior Disorders, Students, Violence, Observer Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review