CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 75

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining the validity of self‐reports on scales measuring students' strategic processing

Samuelstuen, Marit S., Bråten, Ivar·2007·British Journal of Educational Psychology
DOI 10.1348/000709906x106147
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background. Self‐report inventories trying to measure strategic processing at a global level have been much used in both basic and applied research. However, the validity of global strategy scores is open to question because such inventories assess strategy perceptions outside the context of specific task performance. Aims. The primary aim was to examine the criterion‐related and construct validity of the global strategy data obtained with the Cross‐Curricular Competencies (CCC) scale. Additionally, we wanted to compare the validity of these data with the validity of data obtained with a task‐specific self‐report inventory focusing on the same types of strategies. Sample. The sample included 269 10th‐grade students from 12 different junior high schools. Methods. Global strategy use as assessed with the CCC was compared with task‐specific strategy use reported in three different reading situations. Moreover, relationships between scores on the CCC and scores on measures of text comprehension were examined and compared with relationships between scores on the task‐specific strategy measure and the same comprehension measures. Results. The comparison between the CCC strategy scores and the task‐specific strategy scores suggested only modest criterion‐related validity for the data obtained with the global strategy inventory. The CCC strategy scores were also not related to the text comprehension measures, indicating poor construct validity. In contrast, the task‐specific strategy scores were positively related to the comprehension measures, indicating good construct validity. Conclusion. Attempts to measure strategic processing at a global level seem to have limited validity and utility.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000709906x106147

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. 10.1023/A:1022185502996 · DOI
  2. Alexander P. A., 1998, Profiling the differences in students' knowledge, interest, and strategic processing, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 435, 10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.435 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/ceps.1997.0927 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.545 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/026553229501200201 · DOI
  6. Baker L., 2000, Issues in the measurement of metacognition, 99
  7. Baroody A. J., 2003, The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise
  8. Baumert J., 1998, Prepared for life‐long learning: Frame of reference for the measurement of self‐regulated learning as a cross curricular competence (CCC) in the PISA Project
  9. Bentsen J. S., 1998, Kultur og samfunn [Culture and society]
  10. Björnsson C. H., 1968, Läsbarhet [Readability]
  11. 10.1080/0031383930370304 · DOI
  12. Bråten I., 1994, Learning to spell
  13. 10.1016/S1041-6080(01)00036-X · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.324 · DOI
  15. 10.1023/A:1022895207490 · DOI
  16. 10.1075/idj.14.1.07bra · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.18 · DOI
  18. DeVellis R. F., 2003, Scale development: Theory and applications. Applied social research series, 26
  19. 10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215 · DOI
  21. Eriksen T. H., 1998, I samfunnet [In the society]
  22. 10.1016/B978-012762533-1/50011-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.477 · DOI
  25. Howard‐Rose D., 1993, Measuring component and sets of cognitive processes in self‐regulated learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 591, 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.591 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0006-3223(96)84228-4 · DOI
  27. Kerlinger F. N., 2000, Foundations of behavioral research
  28. Knain E., 2000, CCC‐instrumentets utforming [The development of the CCC instrument]
  29. Lie S., 2001, Godt rustet for framtida? Norske 15‐åringers kompetanse i lesing og realfag i et internasjonalt perspektiv [Well equipped for the future? Norwegian 15‐year olds' competence in reading and science in international perspective]
  30. 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.239 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/747700 · DOI
  32. Marchant G. J., 2002, Student reading of assigned articles: Will this be on the test?, Teaching of Psychology, 29, 49
  33. 10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.113 · DOI
  34. Menon G., 2000, The science of self‐report: Implications for research and practice, 63
  35. Ministry of Education and Research.(2003b).Press Report No. 027‐03. Retrieved fromwww.odin.dep.noufdnorskaktueltpressem045071‐070108index‐dok000‐b‐n‐a.html.
  36. 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488 · DOI
  37. National Reading Panel., 2000, Teaching children to read: An evidence‐based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
  38. Nunnally J. C., 1994, Psychometric theory
  39. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)., 2000, Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical, and scientific literacy
  40. 10.1080/00220979809598346 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/00220973.1991.10806587 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/00220973.1994.9943843 · DOI
  43. 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_7 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8 · DOI
  46. Peschar J., 1999, Self‐regulated learning as a cross‐curricular competency. The construction of instruments in 22 countries for the PISA main study 2000. Final report to the OECD
  47. 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Pintrich P. R., 1991, A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)
  49. Pintrich P. R., 2000, Issues in the measurement of metacognition, 43
  50. 10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7 · DOI
  51. Pressley M., 1995, Verbal protocols of reading
  52. Pressley M., 1995, Advanced educational psychology
  53. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.478 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/0013164403063003006 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00441.x · DOI
  56. Samuelstuen M. S., Context effects in Norwegian 10th‐grade students' reports on learning strategies, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
  57. 10.1006/ceps.1994.1013 · DOI
  58. 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1037/h0092690 · DOI
  60. 10.1080/02702710490435547 · DOI
  61. Thorndike R. M., 1996, Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education
  62. Tourangeau R., 2000, The science of self‐report: Implications for research and practice, 29
  63. Trabasso T., 2002, Comprehension instruction: Research‐based best practices, 176
  64. 10.3758/BF03206376 · DOI
  65. Vinje F. E., 1982, Journalistspråket [The journalist language]
  66. Weinstein C. E., 1994, Student motivation, cognition, and learning, 257
  67. 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50051-2 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Weinstein C. E., 1986, Handbook of research on teaching, 315
  69. Weinstein C. E., 1990, LASSI – HS: Learning and Study Strategies Inventory – High School Version
  70. Weinstein C. E., 2002, LASSI: Learning and Study Strategies Inventory
  71. 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.631 · DOI
  72. 10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00006-1 · DOI
  74. Winne P. H., 2002, Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 12. New directions in measures and methods, 121
  75. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.513 · DOI
  76. 10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_6 · DOI
  77. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.741 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/1041-6080(93)90026-O · DOI
  79. Zimmerman B. J., 1998, Self‐regulated learning: From teaching to self‐reflective practice, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 75

Metadata

Authors
Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
351-378
ISSN
  • 0007-0998
  • 2044-8279
DOI
10.1348/000709906x106147
Cited by
75
References
4
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1302 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the validity of self‐reports on scales measuring students' strategic processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000709906x106147
The paper
Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2007). Examining the validity of self‐reports on scales measuring students' strategic processing. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906x106147