Cited by 169Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress Responses and CortisolPain Management and Placebo Effect

Influence of mindfulness practice on cortisol and sleep in long-term and short-term meditators

Brand, Serge, Holsboer-Trachsler, Edith, Naranjo, José Raúl, Schmidt, Stefan·2012·Neuropsychobiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing scientific interest in assessing the biological correlates of non-pharmacological interventions such as mindfulness. Examinations of the beneficial effects of mindfulness on hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical system activity (HPA SA) and sleep are sparse. The aim of the present study was to explore the impact of long- and short-term meditation experience on HPA SA and sleep. METHOD: There were 20 participants, 9 of whom had long-term experience in meditation (mean = 264 months) and 11 novices. Novices underwent an 8-week course in Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), and cortisol samples were taken in the lab at the beginning and end of the course. To assess the cortisol awakening response, 4 morning cortisol samples were collected. Sleep and mindfulness were assessed by self-rating questionnaires. RESULTS: Among participants with long-term meditation experience, morning cortisol decreased with length of experience. For novices, after an 8-week introductory MBSR course, morning cortisol levels had decreased, while both sleep and self-attribution of mindfulness significantly improved. Cortisol levels did not, however, change between the beginning and end of individual MBSR sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of results lends support to the view that MBSR/meditation has a favorable influence both on biomarkers of stress regulation, such as cortisol secretion, and on sleep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000330362

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brand, S., Holsboer-Trachsler, E., Naranjo, J. R., & Schmidt, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Humanistic Studies (NL)
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2012
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
109-118
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
OpenAlex
W2094150959
Cited by
169
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
mindfulness, meditation, cortisol, sleep, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, stress regulation, mindfulness-based stress reduction, long-term meditators, cortisol awakening response
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saliva, Sleep, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Meditation, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review