Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevention of anxiety symptoms in primary school children: Preliminary results from a universal school‐based trial

Barrett, Paula, Turner, Cynthia·2001·British Journal of Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1348/014466501163887
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Preliminary data are presented on the effectiveness of a universal school‐based intervention for the prevention of anxiety symptoms in primary school children. A sample of 489 children (aged 10‐12 years) were assigned to one of three intervention conditions: a psychologist‐led preventive intervention, a teacher‐led preventive intervention, or a usual care (standard curriculum) with monitoring condition. The intervention offered was the Friends for Children programme, a 12‐session cognitive‐behavioural intervention, originally based upon Kendall's (1994) Coping Cat programme. Participants in both intervention conditions reported fewer symptoms of anxiety at post‐intervention than participants in the usual care condition. These preliminary results suggest that universal programmes for childhood anxiety are promising intervention strategies that can be successfully delivered to a school‐based population and integrated into the classroom curriculum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466501163887

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, P., & Turner, C.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-11
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
399-410
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
DOI
10.1348/014466501163887
OpenAlex
W2075430312
Cited by
363
References
3
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.