The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?
Abstract
‘Queen Bees’ are senior women in masculine organizational cultures who have fulfilled their career aspirations by dissociating themselves from their gender while simultaneously contributing to the gender stereotyping of other women. It is often assumed that this phenomenon contributes to gender discrimination in organizations, and is inherent to the personalities of successful career women. We argue for a social identity explanation and examine organizational conditions that foster the Queen Bee phenomenon. Participants were 94 women holding senior positions in diverse companies in The Netherlands who participated in an on‐line survey. In line with predictions, indicators of the Queen Bee phenomenon (increased gender stereotyping and masculine self‐descriptions) were found mostly among women who indicated they had started their career with low gender identification and who had subsequently experienced a high degree of gender discrimination on their way up. By contrast, the experience of gender discrimination was unrelated to signs of the Queen Bee phenomenon among women who indicated to be highly identified when they started their career. Results are discussed in light of social identity theory, interpreting the Queen Bee phenomenon as an individual mobility response of low gender identified women to the gender discrimination they encounter in their work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Black students' school success: Coping with the ?burden of ?acting white??
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf01112192 · Cited by 3,323
Heilman, M. E. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234 · Cited by 2,482
Motivated to penalize: women's strategic rejection of successful women
Parks-Stamm, E. J., Heilman, M. E., & Hearns, K. A. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207310027 · Cited by 217
Ellemers, N., & Van Laar, C. (2010) · The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination · doi:10.4135/9781446200919.n34 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Cited by
Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., & Peters, K. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008 · Cited by 439
A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy
Vial, A. C., Napier, J. L., & Brescoll, V. L. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.004 · Cited by 309
Hekman, D. R., Johnson, S. K., Foo, M.-D., & Yang, W. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0538 · Cited by 257
Gender-Bias Primes Elicit Queen-Bee Responses Among Senior Policewomen
Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & de Groot, K. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417258 · Cited by 185
Self-citationThe Many Ways to Be Marginal in a Group
Ellemers, N., & Jetten, J. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312453086 · Cited by 139
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Derks, B., Ellemers, N., van Laar, C., & de Groot, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-25
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 519-535
- ISSN
- 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8309
- OpenAlex
- W2160239290
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/014466610x525280
- The paper
- Derks, B., Ellemers, N., van Laar, C., & de Groot, K. (2011). Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? British Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610x525280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.