CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Workaholism, burnout, and well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Volunteer work as a valuable leisure‐time activity: A day‐level study on volunteer work, non‐work experiences, and well‐being at work

Mojza, Eva J., Sonnentag, Sabine, Bornemann, Claudius·2011·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
DOI 10.1348/096317910x485737
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this 2‐week diary study, with 105 employees providing data on a total of 476 days, we examined relationships between the amount of time spent on volunteer work activities during leisure time, psychological non‐work experiences in the evening (i.e. recovery experiences of psychological detachment from work and mastery as well as need satisfaction), and work outcomes during the following working day (i.e. positive and negative affect, and active listening). Results confirmed the hypothesized positive relationships between the amount of time spent on volunteer work activities and psychological detachment from work, mastery experiences, and need satisfaction in the evening. Psychological detachment from work in the evening was positively related to active listening during the following working day. Need satisfaction in the evening was negatively related to negative affect and positively related to active listening during the following working day. The amount of time spent on volunteer work activities was negatively related to negative affect during the following working day. This relationship was mediated by need satisfaction in the evening.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/096317910x485737

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bierhoff H.‐W., 2002, Prosocial behavior
  2. Bryk T., 1992, Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods
  3. Monge P. R., 1982, Communication Yearbook 5, 505
  4. Semmer N. K., 1984, Stressbezogene Tätigkeitsanalyse [Stress‐oriented task‐analysis]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–118 of 118

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mojza, E. J., Sonnentag, S., & Bornemann, C.
Affiliations
University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
Mojza, Eva J.
ORCID
Sonnentag, Sabine
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-23
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
123-152
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
DOI
10.1348/096317910x485737
OpenAlex
W1953205736
Cited by
121
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
volunteering, leisure-time activities, psychological detachment, mastery experiences, need satisfaction, recovery experiences, active listening, positive and negative affect, employee well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review