CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 182Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intersections Between the Autism Spectrum and the Internet: Perceived Benefits and Preferred Functions of Computer-Mediated Communication

Gillespie-Lynch, Kristen, Kapp, Steven K., Shane-Simpson, Christina, Smith, David Shane, Hutman, Ted·2014·Intellectual and developmental disabilities
DOI 10.1352/1934-9556-52.6.456
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An online survey compared the perceived benefits and preferred functions of computer-mediated communication of participants with (N = 291) and without ASD (N = 311). Participants with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) perceived benefits of computer-mediated communication in terms of increased comprehension and control over communication, access to similar others, and the opportunity to express their true selves. They enjoyed using the Internet to meet others more, and to maintain connections with friends and family less, than did participants without ASD. People with ASD enjoyed aspects of computer-mediated communication that may be associated with special interests or advocacy, such as blogging, more than did participants without ASD. This study suggests that people with ASD may use the Internet in qualitatively different ways from those without ASD. Suggestions for interventions are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1352/1934-9556-52.6.456

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Murray D. & Lesser M. (1999). Autism and computing. In for Autism99 online conference organised by the NAS with the Shirley Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.autismusundcomputer.de/hypothesis.en.html on
  2. Singer, J. (1999). Why can't you be normal for once in your life? From a problem with no name to the emergence of a new category of difference. Disability Discourse, 59–70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 182

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gillespie-Lynch, K., Kapp, S. K., Shane-Simpson, C., Smith, D. S., & Hutman, T.
Affiliations
  • City University of New York
  • University of California System (US)
ORCID
Venue
Intellectual and developmental disabilities
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
456-469
ISSN
  • 1934-9491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-9556
DOI
10.1352/1934-9556-52.6.456
OpenAlex
W2143442819
Cited by
182
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intellectual and developmental disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, computer-mediated communication, internet use, online communication, perceived benefits, social connectedness, blogging, interest groups, advocacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Communication, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Internet, Comprehension, Young Adult, Pleasure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review