Cited by 1,347Doctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsMentoring and Academic DevelopmentHigher Education Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career

Austin, Ann E.·2002·The Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

The Journal of Higher Education - Volume 73, Number 1, January/February 2002

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jhe.2002.0001

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Austin, A. E.
Corresponding author
Austin, Ann E.
Venue
The Journal of Higher Education
Published
2002
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
94-122
ISSN
  • 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4640
OpenAlex
W2097048647
Cited by
1,347
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 90
FWCI
30.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
graduate education, academic careers, faculty development, socialization, doctoral students, academic hiring, university faculty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review