Cited by 271Bone health and osteoporosis researchPhysical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Effects of exercise involving predominantly either joint-reaction or ground-reaction forces on bone mineral density in older women

Open access
Kohrt, Wendy M., Ehsani, Ali A., Birge, Stanley J.·1997·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

This study compared the effects of two exercise training programs, 11 months in duration, on bone mineral density (BMD) in older, sedentary women. Thirty-nine women, aged 60–74 years, were assigned to the following groups: (a) a group that performed exercises that introduced stress to the skeleton through ground-reaction forces (GRF) (i.e., walking, jogging, stairs); (b) a group that performed exercises that introduced stress to the skeleton through joint-reaction forces (JRF) (i.e., weight lifting, rowing); or (c) a no-exercise control group. BMD of the whole body, lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm was assessed five times at ∼3-month intervals. The GRF and JRF exercise programs resulted in significant and similar increases in BMD of the whole body (2.0 ± 0.8% and 1.6 ± 0.4%, respectively), lumbar spine (1.8 ± 0.7% and 1.5 ± 0.5%, respectively), and Ward's triangle region of the proximal femur (6.1 ± 1.5% and 5.1 ± 2.1%, respectively). There was a significant increase in BMD of the femoral neck only in response to the GRF exercise program (GRF, 3.5 ± 0.8%; JRF, −0.2 ± 0.7%). There were no significant changes in BMD in control subjects. Among all exercisers, there was a significant inverse (r = −0.52, p < 0.01) relationship between increases in whole body BMD and reductions in fat mass, suggesting a dose response effect of exercise on bone mass. Although femoral neck BMD was responsive only to the GRF exercise program, some adaptations (i.e., increase in lean body mass and strength) that were specific to the JRF exercise program may be important in preventing osteoporotic fractures by reducing the risk for falls. It remains to be determined whether all of these benefits can be gained through a training program that combines the different types of exercises employed in this study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.8.1253

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Davy DT, Kotzar GM, Brown RH, Heiple KG, Goldberg VM, 1260 KOHRT ET AL. 15234681, 1997, 8, Downloaded from https://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.8.1253, Wiley Online Library on [01/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohrt, W. M., Ehsani, A. A., & Birge, S. J.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Kohrt, Wendy M.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
1253-1261
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2079869276
Cited by
271
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ar040705-05, RR‐00036)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG05562)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-40705)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5M01 RR-00036, M01RR000036)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
bone mineral density, exercise training, older women, ground reaction force, joint reaction forces, weightlifting, walking, lumbar spine, proximal femur, femoral neck, fat mass, osteoporotic fracture prevention, fall risk, sedentary women
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Blood Chemical Analysis, Body Composition, Calcium, Dietary, Female, Femur, Femur Neck, Forearm, Humans, Joints, Lumbar Vertebrae, Middle Aged, Urine, Exercise, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Weight-Bearing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review