Cited by 259Family Dynamics and RelationshipsReproductive Health and ContraceptionReproductive Health and Technologies

A Cognitive–Social Model of Fertility Intentions

Open access
Bachrach, Christine A., Morgan, S. Philip·2013·Population and Development Review

Abstract

We examine the use and value of fertility intentions against the backdrop of theory and research in the cognitive and social sciences. First, we draw on recent brain and cognition research to contextualize fertility intentions within a broader set of conscious and unconscious mechanisms that contribute to mental function. Next, we integrate this research with social theory. Our conceptualizations suggest that people do not necessarily have fertility intentions; they form them only when prompted by specific situations. Intention formation draws on the current situation and on schemas of childbearing and parenthood learned through previous experience, imbued by affect, and organized by self‐representation. Using this conceptualization, we review apparently discordant knowledge about the value of fertility intentions in predicting fertility. Our analysis extends and deepens existing explanations for the weak predictive validity of fertility intentions at the individual level and provides a social‐cognitive explanation for why intentions predict as well as they do. When focusing on the predictive power of intentions at the aggregate level, our conceptualizations lead us to focus on how social structures frustrate or facilitate intentions and how the structural environment contributes to the formation of reported intentions in the first place. Our analysis suggests that existing measures of fertility intentions are useful but to varying extents and in many cases despite their failure to capture what they seek to measure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00612.x

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bongaarts John Potter Robert G 1983 Fertility, Biology and Behavior New York Academic Press
  2. Edin Kathryn Kefalas Maria 2005 Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage Los Angeles University of California Press
  3. Harding David J 2010 Living the Drama: Community, Conflict, and Culture Among Inner-City Boys Chicago University of Chicago Press
  4. Hays Sharon 1998 The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood New Haven Yale University Press
  5. Morgan S Philip 2001 Should Fertility Intentions Inform Fertility Forecasts? Proceedings of U.S. Census Bureau Conference: The Direction of Fertility in the United States Washington D.C U.S. Census Bureau

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bachrach, C. A., & Morgan, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Maryland Population Research Center (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Population and Development Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
459-485
ISSN
  • 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1728-4457
OpenAlex
W2035730670
Cited by
259
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
27.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r24hd050924-06)
  • Social Science Research Institute, Duke University
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD-050924)
  • Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (R24HD050924, HD050924)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
fertility intentions, intention formation, cognitive mechanisms, unconscious processes, schemas, childbearing, parenthood, self-representation, affect, social structure, social cognitive theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review