Cited by 417Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

DistancePPG: Robust non-contact vital signs monitoring using a camera

Open access
Kumar, Mayank, Veeraraghavan, Ashok, Sabharwal, Ashutosh·2015·Biomedical Optics Express

Abstract

Vital signs such as pulse rate and breathing rate are currently measured using contact probes. But, non-contact methods for measuring vital signs are desirable both in hospital settings (e.g. in NICU) and for ubiquitous in-situ health tracking (e.g. on mobile phone and computers with webcams). Recently, camera-based non-contact vital sign monitoring have been shown to be feasible. However, camera-based vital sign monitoring is challenging for people with darker skin tone, under low lighting conditions, and/or during movement of an individual in front of the camera. In this paper, we propose distancePPG, a new camera-based vital sign estimation algorithm which addresses these challenges. DistancePPG proposes a new method of combining skin-color change signals from different tracked regions of the face using a weighted average, where the weights depend on the blood perfusion and incident light intensity in the region, to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of camera-based estimate. One of our key contributions is a new automatic method for determining the weights based only on the video recording of the subject. The gains in SNR of camera-based PPG estimated using distancePPG translate into reduction of the error in vital sign estimation, and thus expand the scope of camera-based vital sign monitoring to potentially challenging scenarios. Further, a dataset will be released, comprising of synchronized video recordings of face and pulse oximeter based ground truth recordings from the earlobe for people with different skin tones, under different lighting conditions and for various motion scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/boe.6.001565

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, M., Veeraraghavan, A., & Sabharwal, A.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Venue
Biomedical Optics Express
Published
2015-04-06
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
1565
ISSN
2156-7085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029745771
Cited by
417
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 7
FWCI
19.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedical Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rice Research Repository (Rice University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (1126478, 1429047)
  • Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) (THECB-NHARP 13308)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
respiratory rate estimation, photoplethysmography, skin color change, blood perfusion, incident light intensity, signal-to-noise ratio, darker skin tones, motion robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review